Cover not available
Part of
Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 75–104

Pathways of de-iconization

How borrowing, semantic evolution, and regular sound changes obscure iconicity

| St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University, Friedrich Schiller University Jena

The present chapter addresses various issues of de-iconization of iconic (mainly onomatopoeic) words, in particular, in the course of their regular phonetic and semantic development. These processes are described with an emphasis on word’s etymology, examples being drawn from modern and ancient Germanic languages. The chapter proposes a classification of various form transformations that lead to de-iconization.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods and methodology
  • 3.Iconicity and diachronic research: a? brief overview
  • 4.De-iconization of meaning
    • 4.1Mechanisms of semantic evolution
    • 4.2Semantic de-iconization of onomatopoeic and sound symbolic words
    • 4.3Classification of semantic de-iconization patterns
    • 4.4De-iconization of lexical units of higher hierarchy
  • 5.Phonological de-iconization
    • 5.1Regular sound changes
    • 5.2Classification of form transformations leading to de-iconization
      • Pathway 1: Regular sound changes taking place in one language
      • Pathway 2: Adaptation of loanwords and regular sound changes
      • Pathway 3: Root re-combinations and regular sound changes
      • Pathway 4: Root re-combinations, adaptation of loanword, and regular sound changes
  • 6.Aftermaths of de-iconization
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Dictionaries
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.05fla
References
Abelin, Å.
1999 Studies in Sound Symbolism. Göteborg: Göteborg University Press.Google Scholar
Adzimuratova, Z. N.
2010 “Sravnitelno-tipologicheskii analiz podrazhanii svistjaschim i zhuzhaschim zvukam v krymsko-tatarskom yazyke (Comparative-typological analysis of imitations to the whistling sounds in a Crimean Tatar language)”. Scientific Notes of Taurida V.I. Vernadsky National University [Series: Philology and Social Communications] 23 (62) № 3: 32–36.Google Scholar
Afanasiev, A.
1984 Voprosy Semanticheskoi Evolutsii Leksiki: Na Materiale Angliiskikh Zvukopodrazhatelnikh Suschestvitelnikh (Aspects of Vocabulary’s Semantic Evolution: a Study of English Imitative Words). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J.
2013 Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akita, K.
2013 “The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates”. In Iconic Investigations [Iconicity in Language and Literature 12]. L. Elleström, O. Fischer and Ch. Ljungberg (eds.), 331–350. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E.
1998 A Grammar of Iconism. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Bartashova, O. A.
1987 Zvukoizobrazitelnost’ v Trminologii: Na Materiale Angliiskikh Morskikh Terminov (Iconicity in Terminology: On the Material of English Navy Terms). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Bratus, I. B.
1976 Akusticheskie Onomatopi v Indoneziiiskom Jazike (Acoustic Onomatopoes in Indonesian). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Brodovich, O. I.
2008 “Zvukoizobrazitelnost i zvukovie zakony (Iconicity and sound changes)”. In Yazik-Soznanie-Kultura-Sozium, 485–489. Saratov: Nauka.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
2015 Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L.
2011 Historical Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, T.
2010 An Introduction to Historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2017 “Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu”. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2): 363–384.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Akita, K.
2017 “An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese”. Journal of Linguistics, 53(3): 501–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drozhaschikh, N. V.
2000 “Ikonichnost’ slova i teksta: na materiale drevneangliiskogo yazyka (Iconicity of word and text: on the material of Old English language).” Language and Literature (7). Tomsk. URL [URL]. Language and Literature.Google Scholar
2006 Sinergeticheskaya Model Ikonicheskogo Prostranstva Jazyka (Synergetic Model of Iconic Space of the Language). PhD Diss. (Habil.). Tyumen.Google Scholar
Durkin, Ph.
2009 The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, O.
2001 “The position of the adjective in (Old) English from an iconic perspective”. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), 249–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaksman, M. A.
2013 “Preservation of Long Vowels in Onomatopoeic Words Denoting Pure Tones: Phonosemantic Inertia”. In The Proceedings of the Joseph M. Tronsky XVII Memorial Annual International Conference Indo-European Comparative Linguistics and Classical Philology in the Institute for Linguistic Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, N. N. Kazanski (ed), 917–923. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
2015a “Old and Modern English onomatopoeia – two different systems?” In Materialy IV Mezhvuzovskoi Nauchno-Prakticheskoi Konferentsii “Aktualnie Problemy Sovremennoi Lingvistiki” 20–21 Aprelia 2015 Goda (Materials of the 4th University Conference “Current Issues in Linguistics”, April 20–21, 2015), 97–98. St. Petersburg: SPbSEU “LETI’ University Press.Google Scholar
2015b Diachronicheskoye Razvitie Zvuloizobrazitelnoi Leksiki Angliiskogo Yazika (Diachronic Development of English Iconic Vocabulary). PhD diss., St. Petersburg: University of St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
2015c Zvukoizobrazitelnaya Leksika Angliiskogo Yazyka v Sinchronii i Diachronii (English Iconic Vocabulary in Synchrony and Diachrony). St. Petersburg: SPbSEU ‘LETI’ University Press.Google Scholar
2016a “Iconic words in Proto-Germanic”. In Phonosemantics [Anglistics of the XXI century, vol. 2., a special volume in commemoration of Professor Dr. Stanislav Voronin’s 80th anniversary], M. A. Flaksman, O. I. Brodovich (eds.), 39–51. St. Petersburg: ANCO ‘University Education Districts’.Google Scholar
2016b “Predvaritelnye zamechaniya o zvuloizobrazitelnoi systeme islandskogo yazyka (Some preliminary notes on Icelandic onomatopoeia)”. In Problems of Phonosemantics, A. V. Puzyrev, E. F. Tarasov, O. I. Brodovich (eds.), 53–54. Orekhovo-Zuyevo: State University of Humanities and Technology University Press.Google Scholar
2017a “Iconic treadmill hypothesis. The reasons behind continuous onomatopoeic coinage”. In Dimensions of Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature 15], M. Bauer, A. Zirker, O. Fischer and Ch. Ljungberg (eds.), 15–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b “Onomatopoeic words in Gothic: iconic elements in Wulfila’s translation of the New Testament.” In Deutsch als Bindeglied zwischen Inlands- und Auslandsgermanistik [Beiträge zu den 23. GeSuS-Linguistik-Tagen in Sankt Petersburg, 22.-24. Juni 2015, Sprache und Sprachen in Forschung und Anwendung, Band 5], S. Nefedov, L. Grigorieva, B. Bock (Hrsg.), 183–190. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. KovačGoogle Scholar
2017c “Onomatopoeic Words in Gothic: Iconic Elements in Wulfila’s Translation of the New Testament”. In Deutsch als Bindeglied zwischen Inlands- und Auslandsgermanistik [Beiträge zu den 23. GeSuS-Linguistik-Tagen in Sankt Petersburg, 22.–24. Juni 2015, Sprache und Sprachen in Forschung und Anwendung, Band 5], S. Nefedov, L. Grigorieva, B. Bock (Hrsg.), 183–190. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Gazov-Ginsberg, А.М.
1965 Byl li Yazik Zvukoizobrazitelen v Svoich Istokah? (Was The Language Phonoiconic In Its Origin?). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Georgescu, S.
[2018 in print] “Las ‘creaciones expresivas’ del Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico en contexto románico e indoeuropeo. Un nuevo (y a la vez antiguo) enfoque”. In Revista de Filología Románica, 35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “*Mut-, *muc-, *tuc-, *čuc-: variaciones fonéticas del latín vulgar”. In Latin Vulgaire, Latin Tardif XI [Congreso internacional sobre el Latín Vulgar y Tardío], A. García Leal, C. E. Prieto Entrialgo (eds.), 207–220. Hildesheim / Zürich / New York: Olms Weidmann.Google Scholar
Greim, B. D.
1983 “The elliptical idiom: change from icon and index to symbol.” In Language Change, I. Rauch and G. F. Carr (eds.), 1–9. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols J. and Ohala J. J.
(eds). 1994 Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H.
1991 Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. О.
2001 “V poiskakh suschnosti yazyka (Quest for Essence of Language)”. In Semiotika: Anthologija, 111–126. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1933 “Symbolic value of the vowel i:”. Linguistica: 283–303.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D.
1994 “Modern Greek ts: beyond sound symbolism”. In Sound Symbolism, Hinton, L., Nichols J. and Ohala J. J. (eds), 222–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D.
1997 “On the iconic elements in etymological investigation”. Diachronica 4(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kakehi, H.
1982 “Onomatopoeic Expressions in Japanese and English”. In Proceedings of the 13th international Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo, 29 Aug.-4 Sept. Tokyo. P. 913-918Google Scholar
Kankia, N. D.
1988 Primarnaya Motivirovannost Slova: Na Materiale Angliiskogo i Grizinskogo Yazikov (The Primary Motivation of the Word: In English and Georgian). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Klimova, S. V.
1986 Glagoly ‘Nejasnogo Proiskhohdenija V Sokraschennom Oxfordskom Slovare: Elementy Etimologicheskoi Fonosemantiki (Verbs of ‘Uncertain Origin’ in The Concise Oxford English Dictionary: Elements of Etymological Phonosemantics). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Koleva-Zlateva, Zh.
2006a “K etimologii polskogo gogółka (To the etymology of Polish gogółka)”. In Rozprawy komisji językowej. T. LI., 154–165, Łódź: Łódzkie towarzystwo naukowe.Google Scholar
2006b “О proiskhozhdenii nekotorykh russkikh emotivnykh nazyvanii cheloveka (On the origin of some emotional denotations of people)”. In Sovremennii Russkii Yazyk: Funktsionirovanie i Problemy Prepodavaniya [Hungarian association of Russian Language and Literature Didactics, Vestnik 20], 69–73, Budapest.Google Scholar
2006c “Ob etimologizatsii nekotorykh slov, ukazannykh kak nejasnye v Etimologicheskom slovare ukrainskogo yazyka (On the Etymology of Some Words Specified as Vague in the Etymological Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language)”. Slavica XXXV, 31–48. Debrecen.Google Scholar
2008 Slavianskaya leksika zvukosimvolocheskogo proiskhozhdeniya (Slavonic Words of Phonoiconic Origin). Tractata Slavica Universitatis Debreceniensis. Vol. 1. Debrecen.Google Scholar
2016 “Zvukoizobrazitelnostta kato iztochnik na omonimija v blgarskija ezik (Phonoiconicity as a sourse of homonymy in Bulgarian Language)”. In Za slovoto – novi tersenija i podkhody [collection of papers from Anniversary Conference Meeting devoted to Dr. Emily Pernishk], 59–68. Sofia: BAN Press.Google Scholar
Kozlova, T.
2013 “Iconically expressible meanings in proto-Indo-European roots and their reflexes in daughter branches”. In Iconic Investigations [Iconicity in Language and Literature 12], L. Ellenstrцm, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 311–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmich, I. V.
1993 Zvukoizobrazitelnost i Amerikanskii Sleng: Fonosemanticheskii Analiz. (Iconicity in American Slang: a Phonosemantic Analysis). PhD diss., St. Petersburg: University of St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Language IConicity
webpage 2018 URL: [URL].Google Scholar
Lapkina, L. Z.
1979 Angliiskie i Bashkirskie Akusticheskie Onomatopi (English and Bashkir Acoustic Onomatopes). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Levitsky, V. V.
1973 Semantika i fonetika (Semantics and Phonetics). Chernovtsy: Chernovtsy University Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Fonosemanticheskaya motivirovannost’ slova (Phonosemantic motivation of the word)”. Voprosy Jazykoznaniya (1): 26–37.Google Scholar
Liberman, A.
2008 “The Sound Symbolic Phoneme /ʤ/ and some Entgleisungen”. In Problems of General, Germanic and Slavic Linguistics. Papers for 70th Anniversary of professor V. Levickij, 13–17. Chernovtsi: Knigi-XXIGoogle Scholar
2010 “Iconicity and Etymology”. In Signergy [Iconicity in Language and Literature 9], J. Conradie, J. Ronel, M. Beukes, O. Fischer and Ch. Ljungberg (eds), 243–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Likhomanova, L. F.
1986 Semanticheskaya Filiatsia Angliiskikh Glagolov Dvizheniya (Semantic Filiantion of English Verbs Denoting Movement). PhD diss., University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Lühr, R.
1988 Expressivität und Lautgesetz im Germanishen. Heidelberg: Karl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y.
1978 “From Phonosymbolism to Morphosymbolism”. The Fourth LACUS Forum, 511–529.Google Scholar
1990 Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “Regular Sound Development, Phonosymbolic Orchestration, Disambiguation of Homonyms”. In Sound Symbolism, Hinton, L., Nichols J. and Ohala J. J. (eds), 207–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
2007 Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazanaev, I. A.
1985 Osnovnie gruppy zvukosimvolicheskih slov: fonosemanticheskii analiz (na materiale angliiskogo i lesginskogo yazulov) (The Main Groups of English and Lesgin Iconic Words). PhD diss., Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
McGregor, W.
2001 “Ideophones as the Source of Verbs in Northern Australian Languages”. In Ideophones. Typological Studies in Language 44, F. K. Erhard Voeltz, Ch. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 205–222. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mikhalev, A. B.
2016 “Modeling a proto-conceptual space of language (a phono-semantic and cognitive study of Indo-European roots with the initial d-”. In Phonosemantics [Anglistics of the XXI Century, Vol. 2: In Commemoration of Professor Dr. Stanislav Voronin’s 80th Anniversary], M. A. Flaksman, O. I. Brodovich (eds.), 135–147. St. Petersburg: ANCO University Education Districts.Google Scholar
2018 “Fonosemanticheskii profil’ praindoevropeiskikh nazal’nykh soglasnykh (The phonosemantic profile of the Proto-Indo-European nasal consonants)”. In The Proceedings of the VII National University Conference With International Guests ‘Current Issues In Linguistics’, Saint-Petersburg, April 17th -18th, 324–329. St. Petersburg: SPbSEU “LETI’ University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, J. C.
2017 “Continuity and change: On the iconicity of Ablaut Reduplication (AR)”. In Dimensions of Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature 15], M. Bauer, A. Zirker, O. Fischer and Ch. Ljungberg (eds.), 63–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, H.
1886 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
: 1982 Writings of Charles S. Peirce, a Chronological Edition. Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Petukhova, E. V.
2002 Morphologicheskoe i konversionnoe slovoobrazovanie on zvukopodrazhatelnikh osnov v angliiskom yazike (Conversion and Morphological Derivation from English Onomatopoeic Words). PhD diss., University of St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
2015 “Zvukosmyslovye korrelatsii i diachroniya (Sound-sense correlations and diachrony)”. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina 1 (1): 125–133.Google Scholar
2016 “Indoevrpeiskii zvukosimvolicheskii koren’ *kap-/ghabh v sovremennom angliiskom i russkon jazykakh (Indo-European sound symbolic root *kap-/ghabh in the modern English and Russian languages)”. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta (2): 180–185.Google Scholar
Ponomareva S. N.
1991 Fonosemanticheskii Analiz Leksiki: Etymologicheskii Aspekt – Na Materiale Anglojazychnoi Nauchnoi Fantastiki (Phonosemantic Analysis of The Lexicon: Erymological Aspects – On The Material of English Science Fiction). PhD diss., St. Petersburg: University of St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Rozhanskiy, F. I.
2011 Reduplikatsia: Opyt Typologicheskogo Issledovaniya (Reduplication: Studies in Typology). Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar
Sadowski, P.
2009 From Interaction to Symbol: A Systems View of the Evolution of Signs and Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saji, N, K. Akita, M. Imai
et al. 2013 Cross-linguistically shared and language-specific sound symbolism for motion: An exploratory data mining approach”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35): 1253–1258.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de.
1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Shliakhova, S. S.
1991 Tipi i funktsii onomatopov v russkoi rechi (Types and Functions of Onomatopes in Russian Speech – in Russian). PhD diss., Leningrad.Google Scholar
Shvetsova, N. N.
2011 Zvukoizobrazitelnaya Leksika v Angkiiskikh Dialektakh (Iconic Words in English Dialects), PhD diss., St. Petersburg University of Economy.Google Scholar
Sundueva, E. V.
2011 Zvuki i Obrazy: Fonosemanticheskoe Issledovanie Leksem s Kornevym Soglassnym [r/m] v Mongol’skikh Yazykakh (Sounds and Meanings: A Phonosemantic Study of Words Containing Root Consonants [r/m] in Mongolian Languages). Ulan-Ude: IMBT.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L.
1996 Historical Linguistics. London / New York / Sydney / Auckland: Arnold.Google Scholar
Veldi, E. A.
1988 Anglo-Estonskie Paralleli v Onomatopee (English-Estonian Parallels in Onomatopoeia). PhD diss., Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Voeltz, E. F. K. and Kilian-Hatz, Ch.
(eds). 2001 Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voronin, S. V.
1969 Angliiskie Onomatopy: Tipy i Stroenie (English Onomatopes: Types and Structures). Leningrad: University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
1990 “O metode fonosemanticheskogo analiza (On the method of honosemantic analysis).” In Lingvometodicheskie Aspekty Semantiki i Pragmatiki Teksta, 98–100. Kursk.Google Scholar
1998 Angliiskie onomatopy: fonosemanticheskaya klassifikatsiya (English Onomatopes: a Phonosemantic Classification). St. Petersburg: IFL.Google Scholar
2003 “The iconic theory of language origin [Materials from the Round Table Language Origins Research: State of the Art as of 1997, held within the framework of the Congres International des Linguistes, Paris, France, July 22]”. In Voprosy Psiholingvistiki (1): 5–12.Google Scholar
2005 Iconicity. Glottogenesis. Semiosis: Sundry Papers. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Osnovy Phonosemantiki (The Fundamentals of Phonosemantics). Moscow: Lenand.Google Scholar
Voronin, S. V., S. V. Klimova
1998 “Nekotorye voprosy etimologicheskoi fonosemantiki (Some issues of etymological phonosemantics)”. In Anglistica: Sovremennie Distizheniya i Traditcii, 19–25. St. Petersburg: University of St. Petersburg.Google Scholar

Dictionaries

An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online
Bosworth J. Comp. Sean Christ and Ondřej TichýFaculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague. [URL].
Berkov, V. P.
1962 Icelandic-Russian Dictionary. Мoscow: State Publishing House of Foreign and National Languages.Google Scholar
Collins English Dictionary
2012 Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Flaksman, M.
2016c Slovar Angliiskoi Zvukoizobrazitelnoi Leksiki v Diachronicheskom Osveschenii (A Dictionary of English Iconic Words on Historical Principles). St. Petersburg: Institute of Foreign Languages/RHGA.Google Scholar
Iconicity Atlas Project
[URL]
Kroonen, G.
2013 Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden-Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Lehman, W. P.
1986 A Gothic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Levitskii, V. V.
2000 Etimologicheskii slovar germanskikh yazykov (An Etymological Dictionary of Germanic Languages). Chernovtsi: Ruta.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T.
2002 The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Online Etymology Dictionary
D. Harper ed. [URL]
Online Icelandic-English Dictionary
[URL].
Shliahova, S. S.
2004 Drebezgi Yazyka: Slovar’ Russkijh Fonosemanticheskikh Anomalii (Shards of Language: A Dictionary of Russian Phonosemantic Abnormalities). Perm: Perm Pedagogic University Press.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W.
2006 An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. J.
2007 KA-BOOM! A Dictionary of Comic Book Words, Symbols and Onomatopoeia. Surrey BC: Mora Publications.Google Scholar
The Arni Magnusson Institute for Icelandic Language reference page
[URL].
The Oxford English Dictionary
3d edition). [URL].
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Barnes, Kathryn & Cornelia Ebert
2023. The information status of iconic enrichments: modelling gradient at-issueness. Theoretical Linguistics 49:3-4 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2023. Gradience in iconicity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho & André Nogueira Xavier
2021. A iconicidade como uma característica universal das línguas. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.