Cover not available
Part of
Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 293–306

The cognitive function of iconicity

| Catholic University of São Paulo

Unfortunately, Peirce’s concept of the icon has been reduced to the notion of a sign that represents its object by similarity. It is true that Peirce considered a subdivision of the icons into the image, the diagram, and the metaphor, which reveal other facets of this sign type. However, even this subdivision does not exhaust the whole picture of iconicity. Although no explicit systematization can be found in Peirce’s work, the distinction between pure icon on the one hand and actual icons on the other are clearly drawn in some passages of his writings. The aim of this paper is to discuss these passages in order to stress that the notions of pure icon, actual icons, and hypoicons fit perfectly well in the logical framework of the categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. Then, the distinct perceptual and cognitive functions of these facets of iconicity will be explored.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The pure icon
  • 3.Actual icons
    • 3.1Peirce’s theory of perception
    • 3.2The cognitive role of the icon in perceptual judgment
    • 3.3Perceptual judgments of iconic qualisigns
  • 4.Hypoicons or iconic signs
    • 4.1Images
    • 4.2Diagrams
    • 4.3Metaphors
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.17san
References
Bernstein, R. J.
1964 “Peirce’s theory of perception”. In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, E. C. Moore and R. S. Robin (eds), 165–189. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.
(1960) 2008 “A yellow rose”. In J. L. Borges, Dreamtigers, transl. M. Boyer and H. Morland. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press. – Quoted from [URL] accessed 20–09–2009.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
1931–58 Collected Papers, vols. 1–6, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, vols. 7–8, ed. A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press (quoted as CP).Google Scholar
Ramos, Ricardo
2013 Circuito fechado: Contos. Rio de Janeiro: Globo Livros.Google Scholar
Ransdell, J.
1966 Charles Peirce. The Idea of Representation. Unpublished PhD thesis. New York, NY: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Santaella, L.
1993 Percepção: Uma teoria semiótica. São Paulo: Experimento.Google Scholar
(2000) A teoria geral dos signos. Semiose e autogeração. São Paulo: Ática; 2nd ed. São Paulo: Pioneira.Google Scholar
1996 “From pure icon to metaphor: Six degrees of iconicity”. In Peirce’s Doctrine of Signs: Theory, Applications, and Connections, V. M. Colapietro and T. M. Olshewsky (eds), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 252–262.Google Scholar
Savan, D.
1976 An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System of Semiotic. Toronto: Victoria College of the University (=Monograph series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle 1).Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Keränen, Jarkko
2023. Cross-modal iconicity and indexicality in the production of lexical sensory and emotional signs in Finnish Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.