Chapter published in:
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 103134
References
Aarnio, J.
2008Rhetoric and representation : Exploring the cultural meaning of the natural sciences in contemporary popular science writing and literature. PhD Dissertation, Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Anderson, D.
1984Peirce on metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 20(4): 453–468.Google Scholar
Austin, J.
1957A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
1988The iconicity of rhetorical figures: ‘Schemes’ as devices for textual cohesion. Language and Style 21(2):162–90.Google Scholar
Burke, K.
(1941 [1938]) Literature as equipment for living. Philosophy of Literary Form. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, pp. 293–304.Google Scholar
Bush, G. W. and [Gerson, M.
] 2001Address before a joint session of the Congress on the United States response to the terrorist attacks of September 11 (20 September). GovInfo. govinfo​.gov​/content​/pkg​/WCPD​-2001​-09​-24​/pdf​/WCPD​-2001​-09​-24​-Pg1347​.pdf
Chomsky, A. N.
1986Knowledge of Language. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
2013Beyond fascism: Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Holder and Doug Morris. ZNet 24 May. chomsky​.info​/20130524/
[Pseudo-]Cicero, Marcus Tullius
1954 [c95 BCE]. Ad C. Herennium de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium). Harry Caplan (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
CP
. See Peirce (1931 [1877–1904]).Google Scholar
Dickens, C.
1884Great Expectations. London: R. Worthington.Google Scholar
Douglas, M.
2007Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dubremetz, M., and Nivre, J.
2018Rhetorical figure detection: Chiasmus, epanaphora, epiphora. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 17 May. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumas, A.
1849Les trois mousquetaires. Paris: Dufour & Mulat.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J.
1999Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, W.
2010Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. Boston: David R. Godine.Google Scholar
Filkuková, P., and Klempe, S. H.
2013Rhyme as reason in commercial and social advertising. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 54(5); 423–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1984Syntax – A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greer, Germaine
1988, June 3. The proper study of womankind. Times Literary Supplement.Google Scholar
Harris, R. A., and Di Marco, C.
2017Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation. Argument & Computation 8(3): 211–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
2003Iconicity. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics Volume 1. Second edition. W. Frawley (ed.), 57–61. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hiraga, M. K.
2005Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analysing Texts. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kara-Yakoubian, M., Walker, A. C. , Sharpinskyi, K. , Assadourian, G. , Fugelsang, J. A. , and Harris, R. A.
2022Chiasmus and the Keats heuristic. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., and Juneja, J. K.
2006Comprehensive Objective Physics. New Delhi: Laxmi Publications.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Lanham, R.
1991A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Second edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H.
1998Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. D. F. Orton and R. D. Anderson (trans.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., and Short, M.
2007 [1981]Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Second edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Guin, U. K.
2019 [1969]The Left Hand of Darkness. New York: Ace.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.
2013Monsanto sows seeds of protest. Denver Post (28 May).Google Scholar
Ljungberg, C.
(2020) Crisscrossing James Joyce’s Ulysses: Chiasmus and cognition. In Operationalizing Iconicity. P. Perniss, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 17, 199–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N.
1997Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
2012Theory of Society 1. Rhodes Barrett (trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, C.
2017‘Strong and stable’ – A lesson in the use of consonance, rhyme-as-reason, and the Keats heuristic. Medium.com (3 May). medium​.com​/@chrislynch​_mwm​/strong​-and​-stable​-a​-lesson​-in​-the​-use​-of​-consonance​-rhyme​-as​-reason​-and​-the​-keats​-heuristic​-ba7d2340d863
Mandela, Nelson
1994The Long Walk to Freedom. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D.
1993Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S., and Tofighbakhsh, J.
1999The Keats heuristic: Rhyme as reason in aphorism interpretation. Poetics. 26 (4): 235–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S. and Tofighbakhsh, J.
2000Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science. 11 (5): 424–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, W. G.
2001Iconicity and rhetoric. In The Motivated Sign. O. Fischer and M. Nänny (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, 305–322. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nänny, M.
1986Iconicity in Literature. Word & Image 2(3): 199–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nänny, M.
1987Chiastic structures in literature: Some forms and functions. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 3: 75–96.Google Scholar
Netanjahu, Binyamin
2014Full text of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s UN speech. The Jerusalem Post (29 September).Google Scholar
Newton, I.
1687Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Jussu Societatis Regiae. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1803 [1687]The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Three volumes. Andrew Motte (trans.). London. H.D. Symonds.Google Scholar
Nöth, W.
2001Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature. In The Motivated Sign. O. Fischer and M. Nänny (eds.) Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, 17–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrman, R.
1986Samuel Butler and the Meaning of Chiasmus. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Creating the world in our image. A new theory of love of symmetry and iconicist desire. In Form Miming Meaning. M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 1 , 59–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, S. writer and Moore, S. D.
(director) 1998The joy of sect. The Simpsons, episode 191. J. L. Brooks (producer). Los Angeles, CA: Twentieth Century Fox Television.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C., and Harris, R. A.
2017Antimetabole and image schemata: Ontological and vector space models. JOWO (Joint Ontology Workshops) 2017. Free University of Bozen. Bolzano, Italy. 21 September. http://​ceur​-ws​.org​/Vol​-2050​/ISD​_paper​_3​.pdf
Pasteur, L.
1886 [1883]La dissymétrie moléculaire. Conférences de Société chimique de France. Paris: Bureaux de la Revue scientifique.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
1931 [1877–1904]Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pelkey, J.
2017The Semiotics of X: Chiasmus, Cognition, and Extreme Body Memory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Penrose, R.
1989The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plett, H. F.
2010Literary Rhetoric: Concepts – Structures – Analyses. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puttenham, G.
1869 [1589]The Arte of English Poesie. E. Arber (ed.) London: Alex Murray.Google Scholar
Quinn, A., and Rathburn, L.
1996Antimetabole. In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition. Theresa Enos (ed.). New York: Garland, 12.Google Scholar
Sunday edition
2014 (24 August). CBC Radio.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E.
1999Linguistic expression of perceptual relationships. Iconicity as a principle of text organization (a case study). In Form Miming Meaning. M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 1 , 409–420. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems, vol I. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R.
Tubaj, E.
2019Rhyming for a reason: Why Rhyming slogans are more effective in communicating big ideas. CogBlog (26 November). web​.colby​.edu​/cogblog​/2019​/11​/26​/rhyming​-for​-a​-reason​-why​-rhyming​-slogans​-are​-more​-effective​-in​-communicating​-big​-ideas/
Turner, M.
1998Figure. In Figurative Language and Thought, A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. W. Gibbs, Jr., and M. Turner (eds.), 44–87. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
1991Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vickers, B.
1988In Defence of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, John
1981Chiasmus in Antiquity. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Wescott, R.
1971Linguistic iconism. Language, 47(2): 416–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weyl, H.
1952Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar