Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 265288
References
Brennan, M.
1990Word Formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
1992The visual world of BSL. An introduction. In Dictionary of British Sign Language/English, D. Brien (ed.), 2–133. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Brien, D.
(ed.) 1992Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Sevcikova, Z. and Schembri, A.
2012Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication 32, 329–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S. and Sevcikova-Sehyr, Z.
2015Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2), 167–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, C.
2000La Langue des Signes Française (LSF). Les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2004 “Phonétique” de la LSF: Une formalisation problématique. In Silexicales. [Linguistique de la LSF: recherches actuelles. Actes du colloque de Villeneuve d’Ascq 23–24 sept. 2003], 93–113.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. and Sallandre, M.-A.
2007Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In Verbal and Signed Languages. Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies, E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea and R. Simone (eds.), 13–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dudis, P.
2004Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15, 223–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. and Heßmann, J.
2000Leben im Kommunikationskonflikt. Zur Ungleichsprachigkeit Hörender und Gehörloser. In Botschaften verstehen: Kommunikationstheorie und Zeichenpraxis. Festschrift für Helmut Richter, E. W. B. Hess-Lüttich and H. W. Schmitz (eds.), 47–66. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.Google Scholar
Ferrara, L. and Hodge, G.
2018Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. and Kollien, S.
2006Constructed action in DGS: Roses Aktions = Fragment (Teil II). In Das Zeichen 74, 448–463. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
2014Constructed Dialogue und „die Hörenden“ in DGS-Erzählungen (Teil I). In Das Zeichen 98, 416–422. [Online resource: URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Fischer, R. and Müller, A.
2014eLCA – An e-learning unit for acquiring constructed action. In Teaching and Learning Signed Languages: International Perspectives and Practices, D. McKee, R. S. Rosen and R. McKee (eds.), 111–128. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanke, T. and Storz, J.
2008iLex – A database tool for integrating sign language corpus linguistics and sign language lexicography. In LREC 2008 Workshop Proceedings. W 25: 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, O. Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, T. Hanke, E. Thoutenhoofd and I. Zwitserlood (eds.), 64–67. Paris: ELRA. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Himmelmann, N.
1998Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36, 161–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T.
2010From archive to corpus: Transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15 (1), 104–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. and Schembri, A.
1999On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2), 115–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. In: Langage et société n° 131, mars 2010, 19–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, S., Konrad, R. and Langer, G.
2008What’s in a sign? Theoretical lessons from practical sign language lexicography. In Signs of the Time. Selected Papers from TISLR 2004, J. Quer (ed.), 379–404. Hamburg: Signum. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Konrad, R., Hanke, T., König, S., Langer, G., Matthes, S., Nishio, R. and Regen, A.
2012From form to function. A database approach to handle lexicon building and spotting token forms in sign languages. In Interaction between Corpus and Lexicon. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages [8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, Istanbul, Turkey], O. Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, S.-E. Fotinea, Hanke, T., Kristoffersen, J. and Mesch, J. (eds.), 87–94. Paris: ELRA. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Konrad, R., Hanke, T., Langer, G., Blanck, D., Bleicken, J., Hofmann, I., Jeziorski, O., König, L., König, S., Nishio, R., Regen, A., Salden, U., Wagner, S., Worseck, S. and Schulder, M.
2020MY DGS – annotated. Public Corpus of German Sign Language, 3rd release. [Dataset. Universität Hamburg. ]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konrad, R., Hanke, T., Langer, G., König, S., König, L., Nishio, R., & Regen, A.
2022Public DGS Corpus: Annotation Conventions 4.1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langer, G.
2005Bilderzeugungstechniken in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Das Zeichen 70, 254–270. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Lepic, R. and Occhino, C.
2018A construction morphology approach to sign language analysis. In The Construction of Words, G. Booij (ed.), 141–172. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
2003Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. and Metzger, M.
1998Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30 (6), 657–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandel, M.
1977Iconic Devices in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand. New Perspectives on American Sign Language, L. A. Friedman (ed.), 57–107. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.
1995Constructed Dialogue and Constructed Action in American Sign Language. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, C. Lucas (ed.), 255–271. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. [Online resource; URL: [URL]; last access: 2022-05-18].
Müller, C.
2014Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Body – Language – Communication [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikations-wissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 38(2)], C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, and J. Bressem (eds.), 1687–1701. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter/Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sallandre, M.-A.
2001Va et vient de l’iconicité en Langue des Signes Française. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (A.I.L.E.) 15, 37–59. DOI logo
Schembri, A.
2003Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed.), 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schick, B.
1990Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1, 15–40.Google Scholar
Supalla, T.
1978Morphology of verbs of motion and location. In Proceedings of the Second National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, F. Caccamise, Frank and D. Hicks (eds.), 27–45. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
1986The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, C. Craig (ed.), 181–214. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
2010Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (repr. with corrections, 2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S. F.
2001Language from the Body. Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S.
2004Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2), 119–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Signed Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts, and H. Cuyckens (eds.), 1113–1136. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar