Cover not available
Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 351–368

The correlation between meaning and verb formation in Japanese sound-symbolic words

ORCID logo | Kanazawa Seiryo University

This study uses quantitative analysis to explore the correlation between meaning and the verb formation of Japanese sound-symbolic words. The study shows that the verb formation of Japanese sound-symbolic words may not fit into traditional categories, such as phonomimes, phenomimes, and psychomimes, but is better categorized based on differences in the sensory modalities of the words. Furthermore, it suggests that iconicity is not a crucial factor for the verb formation of sound-symbolic words; the sharing of information between the speaker and the hearer is a more comprehensive motivation for verb formation, supported by psychological, cognitive linguistic, and typological concepts.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies and aim of this study
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Findings
  • 5.Psychological motivation and information sharing
  • 6.Linguistic motivation
  • 7.Typological possibilities
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.16sug
References
Akita, K.
2009a A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.
2009b The acquisition of the constraints on mimetic verbs in Japanese and Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 16: 163–177.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
2015 Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., and Monaghan, P.
2015 Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, K.
1999 Yoji no gengo ni mirareru giongo / gitaigo [phonomines and phenomimes seen in baby talk]. In Kansei no kotoba wo kenkyu suru [Surveying language expressions related to sensitivity], N. Osaka (eds), pp. 155–174. Tokyo: Shin-yosha.Google Scholar
Hamano, S.
1998 The Sound-Symbolic System in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2014 Nihongo no Onomatope: Onshocho to Kozo [Japanese Onomatopoeia: Sound-Symbolism and Structure]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kakehi, H.
1982 Onomatopoeic expressions in Japanese and English. Proceedings of XXIIIth International Congress of Linguists: 913–919.Google Scholar
1993 Ippan goi to natta onomatope [Onomatopoeia which became ordinary words]. Gekkan Gengo 22 (6): 38–45.Google Scholar
2001 Henshin suru onomatopoeia [Onomatopoeia which transforms]. Gekkan Gengo 30 (9): 28–36.Google Scholar
Kakehi, H. et al.
(eds.) 1996 Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saji, N., and Imai, M.
2013 Goi shutoku ni okeru ruizosei no koka no kento: oya no hatsuwa to kodomo no rikai no kanten kara [Survey on effect of iconicity in acquisition of word meaning: in the view of parents’ utterance and children’s understanding]. In Onomatope Kenkyu no Shatei [Range of Research of Onomatopoeia], K. Shinohara and R. Uno (eds), 151–166. Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar
Sugahara, T.
2011 Onomatopoeia in spoken and written English: corpus- and usage-based analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hokkaido University
2014 Gitaigo gijogo no doshika ni kansuru bunseki: hanpukukei onomatope suru doshi no hindo wo moto ni [Analysis of the verb formation of phenomimes and psychomimes: based on the frequency of reduplicative onomatopoeia + suru verbs]. JCLA 14: 106–116.Google Scholar
2018 Nihongo onomatope no imi to doshika no sokan kankei: hanpukukei wo moto ni [The interrelation between meanings and the verb formation in Japanese onomatopoeia: based on reduplicative forms]. JCLA 18: 110–122.Google Scholar
2019 Nihongo onomatope no imi to doshika no sokan kankei: hihanpukukei wo moto ni [The interrelation between meanings and the verb formation in Japanese onomatopoeia: based on non-reduplicative forms]. JCLA 19: 174–184.Google Scholar
Sugahara, T., and Hamano, S.
2015 A corpus-based semantic analysis of Japanese mimetic verbs. In Iconicity: East Meets West, M. K. Hiraga et al. (eds), 143–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tamori, I.
1991 Nihongo Onomatope no Kenkyu [Research on Japanese Onomatopoetic Words]. Kobe: Kobe Shoka Daigaku Keizai Kenkyujo.Google Scholar
Tamori, I., and Schourup, L.
1999 Onomatope: Keitai to Imi [Onomatopoeia: Morphology and Semantics]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Toratani, K.
2015 Iconicity in the syntax and lexical semantics of sound-symbolic words in Japanese. In Iconicity: East Meets West, M. K. Hiraga et al. (eds), 125–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uno, R. et al.
2013 Webu kopasu no hirogari kara arawareru onomatope no futatsu no kyokai [Two borderlines seen in the range of web corpuses]. In Onomatope Kenkyu no Shatei [Range of Research on Onomatopoeia], K. Shinohara and R. Uno (eds), 117–132. Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar