Mysteries of the substrate

William Labov | University of Pennsylvania

There can be little doubt about the existence of substrate effects in many cases when a whole population abandons their original language and adopts another. But there are situations in which the direction of linguistic influence remains unexplained, the causal connections are obscure, or the expected effect does not occur. We still do not know just how young children in American society manage not to acquire the foreign accent of their parents. If anything, the effect of parents’ language may be in the opposite direction from that predicted by contrastive analysis. Several cases of unmistakeable but inexplicable substrate effects are discussed: the initiation of the merger of /o/ and /oh/ by Slavic-speaking coal miners in Eastern Pennsylvania; the use of later for earlier in the English of Puerto Rican Spanish speakers, and the confusion of make and let among several generations of Italian-American speakers of English.

Keywords: /o/ and /oh/ merger, foreign accent, Italian-American English, Pennsylvania English, Puerto Rican Spanish, substrate effects

Published online: 26 September 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.24.19lab

Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Blondeau, Hélène & Michael Friesner

2014. Manifestations phonétiques de la dynamique des attributions ethnolinguistiques à Montreal. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 59:1 ► pp. 83 ff.

Carter, Phillip M., Lydda López Valdez & Nandi Sims

2020. New Dialect Formation Through Language Contact. American Speech 95:2 ► pp. 119 ff.

Grama, James, Catherine E. Travis & Simon Gonzalez

2020. Ethnolectal and community change ov(er) time: Word-final (er) in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 346 ff.

Grama, James, Catherine E. Travis & Simon Gonzalez

2021. In Language Variation – European Perspectives VIII [Studies in Language Variation, 25], ► pp. 292 ff.

Habib, Rania

2014. Vowel variation and reverse acquisition in rural Syrian child and adolescent language. Language Variation and Change 26:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Hoffman, Michol F. & James A. Walker

2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Kern, Friederike

2015. Turkish German. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:5 ► pp. 219 ff.

Litty, Samantha, Jennifer Mercer & Joseph C. Salmons

2019. In Processes of Change [Studies in Language Variation, 21], ► pp. 115 ff.

Newman, Michael

2010. Focusing, implicational scaling, and the dialect status of New York Latino English1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:2 ► pp. 207 ff.

Niedt, Greg

2020. Tempo and affect in the Linguistic Landscape. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 6:1 ► pp. 80 ff.

Rankinen, Wil

2018. Lingering Substrate and Encroaching Exogenous Influences on Finnish and Italian Americans’ Vowels in Michigan’s Marquette County. American Speech 93:2 ► pp. 223 ff.

Sharma, Devyani & Lavanya Sankaran

2011. Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23:3 ► pp. 399 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.