Article published in:
Gender Across Languages: Volume 4
Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Heiko Motschenbacher
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 36] 2015
► pp. 203225
References

References

Abondolo, Daniel
1998 “Hungarian.” In: The Uralic languages, ed. Daniel Abondolo. London: Routledge, 428–456.Google Scholar
Benkö, Loránd
1967A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára [The historical Hungarian etymological dictionary], Vol. 1. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar
Borgos, Anna & Judit Szilágyi
2011Női írók és írónők: Irodalmi szerepek a Nyugatban [Female writers and writer women: Literary roles in ‘Nyugat’ (The West)]. Budapest: Norán.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1997 “Making men out of people. The MAN principle in translating genderless forms.” In Communicating gender in context, eds. Helga Kotthoff & Ruth Wodak. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Turkish: The communication of gender in Turkish.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 1, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1995Verbal hygiene. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dede, Éva
2008 “Wie verwandelt sich die Frau in Dame? Selbstbezeichnung der Frauen in ungarischen Partnerschaftsanzeigen.” In Genderbilder aus Ungarn. Ergebnisse der ungarischen Genderforschung, eds. Erika Kegyes & Ágnes Huszar. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač, 91–106.Google Scholar
Domonkosi, Ágnes
2002Megszólitasok és beszédpartnerre utaló elemek nyelvhasználatunkban [Address forms and other elements in our linguistic usage]. Debrecen: Debreceni Nyelvtudományi Intézet.Google Scholar
Dömötör, Adrienne
2006 “A nyelvújitás [Language reform].” In Magyar nyelv, ed. Ferenc Kiefer. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 385–400.Google Scholar
Engelberg, Mila
2002 “The communication of gender in Finnish.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 2, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Caleb
2011 “Gendered pronouns and thought: The ligature between epicene pronouns and a more neutral gender perception.” Gender and Language 5(1): 133–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fazekas, Tiborc
1989 “Sexusbezogenheit in einer Sprache, die kein Genus kennt (Ungarisch).” In Semiotik der Geschlechter. Akten des 6. Symposiums der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Semiotik, eds. Jeff Bernard & Theresia Klugsberger. Stuttgart: Dieter Heinz, 243–248.Google Scholar
Fercsik, Erzsébet
2010 “Traditional and modern forms of naming of Hungarian women.” Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Scienze Onomastiche, Pisa, 28 agosto-4 settembre 2005. Vol. 4, eds. Maria Giovanna Arcamone & Donatella Bremer & Davide de Camilli & Bruno Porcelli. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 131–140.Google Scholar
European Parliament
2009A nemek szempontjából semleges nyelvhasználat az Európai Parlamentben [The gender-neutral language use in the European Parliament]. http://​www​.europarl​.europa​.eu​/RegData​/publications​/2009​/0001​/P6​_PUB%282009%290001​_HU​.pdf [13 August 2014].
Gervais-le-Gaff, Marie Marthe
2002 “ Liberté, égalité, sororité: A new linguistic order in France.” Women and Language 25(2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Hampares, Katherine J.
1976 “Sexism in Spanish lexicography?Hispania59: 100–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heise, Elke
2000 “Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen.” Sprache und Kognition 19(1/2): 3–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis
1990Kontrastive feministische Linguistik. Mechanismen sprachlicher Diskriminierung im Deutschen und Englischen. Ismaning: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis & Christine Bierbach
1993Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter: Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch. Bonn: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis & Hadumod Bussmann
2001 “Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 1, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, Péter Iván
2011 “Szónemesités [Word amelioration].” Nyelvi kérdések 54. www​.e​-nyelvmagazin​.hu [13 May 2014].Google Scholar
Huszár, Ágnes
2011A nő terei [Women’s spaces]. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiadó.Google Scholar
Irmen, Lisa, & Jochen Knoll
1999 “On the use of the grammatical gender in anaphoric pronouns in German. A comparison between Finns and Germans.” Sprache und Kognition 18: 123–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irmen, Lisa & Julia Kurovskaja
2010 “On the semantic content of grammatical gender and its impact on the representation of human referents.” Experimental Psycholinguistics 57(5): 367–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kálmán, László
2013 “Az olvasónők és nyelvésznők dilemmája [The dilemma of reading women and women linguists].” Nyelv és tudomány. http://​www​.nyest​.hu​/hirek​/az​-olvasonok​-es​-a​-nyelvesznok​-dilemmaja [10 May 2014].Google Scholar
Kegyes, Erika
2004 “Wahrheitsgehalt der Geschlechterstereotype am Beispiel ungarischer Sprichwörter.” In Publicationes universitatis miskolciensis. Sectio philosophica. Tomus IX, fasciculus 2, ed. Ferenc Lendvai. Miskolc: Typographia Universitatis, 137–164.Google Scholar
2008 “Sexusgrammatik und Gendersemantik. Ausdrucksformen des Geschlechts im Ungarischen.” In Genderbilder aus Ungarn. Ergebnisse der ungarischen Genderforschung, eds. Erika Kegyes & Ágnes Hussar. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač, 73–90.Google Scholar
Kegyesné Szekeres, Erika
2005“Sprachlicher Sexismus und sprachliches Gender Mainstreaming im Fokus der europäischen Sprachpolitik. European Integration Studies 4(2): 24–44.Google Scholar
2007 “Nyelvi szekizmus és szexista nyelvhasználat a magyar nyelvben [Institutional language activism and sexist language in Hungarian].” In Sokszinü nyelvészet. Alkalmazott nyelvészeti gender-kutatás [Varied linguistics. Applied linguistics and gender research], eds. Erika Kegyesné Szekeres & Simigné Sarolta Fenyő. Miskolc: Miskolci Egyetem Alkalmazott Nyelvśzeti Tanszék, 91–100.Google Scholar
Kenyesei, István & Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi
1998Hungarian. London: Psychology Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerékjártó, Ágnes & Katalin Szili
2005 “Graceful women and stalwart men. The concept of masculinity and femininity in the Hungarian language.” In Bouquet hongrois, ed. Maria Czibere. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 91–99.Google Scholar
Kiss, Jenő & Gábor Tolcsvai-Nagy
1999 “Hungarian as a Finno-Ugric language.” In A companion to Hungarian studies, ed. Lászlo Kosa. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 35–105.Google Scholar
Koniuszaniec, Gabriela & Hanka Błaszkowska
2003 “Language and gender in Polish.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 259–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Johanna
2005Our otherness. Finno-Ugrian approaches to women’s studies, or vice versa. Vienna: LIT.Google Scholar
Misad, Katalin
2012 “The characteristics of women’s names in Slovakia.” AHEA: E-Journal of the American Hungarian Educators Association 5. http://​ahea​.net​/e​-journal​/volume​-5​-2012. [14 May 2014]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2010Language, gender and sexual identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré
1990 “ He, she, or it: The enigma of grammar and gender.” In Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity, eds. Peter Mühlhäusler & Rom Harré. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 228–247.Google Scholar
Nagy, Marcell & Viviana Patti
2006 “Lexical gender in Hungarian: Reflections of social structures in an electronic corpus.” In Gender, language and new literacy: A multilingual analysis, eds. Eva Maria Thüne & Simona Leonardi & Carla Bazzanella. London: Continuum, 182–195.Google Scholar
Pete, István
2000 “Ferfinyelv-e a magyar? [Is Hungarian a men’s language?]” Magyar nyelvőr 124: 198–115.Google Scholar
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L. & T. Andrew Caswell & Emmi K. Laakso
2012 “The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages.” Sex Roles 66: 268–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puskás-Juhász, Maria-Csilla
1998 “En hongrois.” In La feminization des noms de métiers. En français et dans d’autres langues, ed. Anne-Marie Houdebine-Gravaud. Paris: L’Harmattan, 103–112.Google Scholar
Raátz, Judit
2008 “Geschlechtsstereotype im ungarischen Vornamenschatz.” In Genderbilder aus Ungarn. Ergebnisse der ungarischen Genderforschung, eds. Erika Kegyes & Ágnes Hussar. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač, 117–130.Google Scholar
2011 “Nick as self-attributed name.” Nouvelle Revue d’Onomastique 53: 181–207.Google Scholar
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
2003 “Gendered structures in Japanese.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 201–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sólyom, Erika
2011 “Linguistic address systems in post-1989 Hungarian urban discourse.” Comparative Hungarian cultural studies, eds. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek & Louise O. Vasvári. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 284–295.Google Scholar
Soukup, Ilona
2009 “Die europäische Sprachpolitik und ihre Wirkung auf Ungarn. Grundlagen – Anforderungen – Umsetzung.” WEBFU: Wiener Elektronische Beiträge des Instituts für Finno-Ugristik 8: 1–22.Google Scholar
Tainio, Liisa
2006 “Gender in Finnish language use: Equal, unequal and/or queer.” WEBFU: Wiener elektronische Beiträge des Instituts für Finno-Ugristik 5: 1–19.Google Scholar
Tóth, Edina
2007 “A társadalmi nem megjelenési formái a magyar nyelvben [The appearance of gender in Hungarian].” Conference paper, University of Szeged.
Vasvári, Louise O.
2006 “Queer theory and discourses of desire.” CLCWeb 8(1).Google Scholar
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1290&context=clcweb
13 May 2014].
Vasvári, Louise O.
2011 “Grammatical gender trouble and Hungarian gender[lessness]: Part I. Comparative linguistic gender.” AHEA E-Journal 4. http://​ahea​.net​/sitefiles​/file​/journals​/201111​/Vasvari​.L​.O​.pdf [13 May 2014].Google Scholar
Zhang, Hong Z.
2002 “Reality and representation: Social control and gender relations in Mandarin Chinese proverbs.” In Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 2, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bussmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hasselblatt, Cornelius
2015.  In Gender Across Languages [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 36],  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.