Article published in:
Language Development: The lifespan perspective
Edited by Annette Gerstenberg and Anja Voeste
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 37] 2015
► pp. 938
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ruch, Hanna, Yvonne Zürcher & Judith M. Burkart
2018. The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews 93:2  pp. 996 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baayen, R.H.
2009Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., Wikle, T., Tillery, J. & Sand, L.
1991The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3(3): 241–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K.D. & Clyne, M.
1989Language Reversion Revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(2): 167–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H.
1987The spread of language change: Verifying inferences of linguistic diffusion. In Language Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications and Case Studies, P.H. Lowenberg (ed.), 45–60. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chistovich, L.A. & Lublinskaya, V.V.
1979The “center of gravity” effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Journal of Hearing Research 1(3): 185–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, N.
2000Alistair Cooke: The Biography. London: Orion.Google Scholar
Clyne, M.
2011Bilingualism, code-switching and aging. A myth of attrition and a tale of collaboration. In Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos – In Honor of Kees de Bot [Studies in Bilingualism 43], M. Schmid & W. Lowie (eds), 201–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, A.
2007Letter from America, 1946–2004. St. Ives: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, M.G.
1987On vowel height: Acoustic and perceptual representation by the fundamental and the first formant frequency. In Proceedings of the XIth International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 5, 198–201. Tallinn: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
1994Acoustic and perceptual evidence of a complex relation between F1 and F2 in determining vowel height. Journal of Phonetics 22: 205–224.Google Scholar
2003Vowels: A Revisit. In Studi in Onore di Franco Ferrero, P. Cosi, E.M. Caldognetto & A. Zamboni (eds), 143–148. Rome: Unipress.Google Scholar
Evans, B.G. & Iverson, P.
2007Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6): 3814–3826. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, R.P., Diehl, R.L. & Traunmüller, H.
1996Perception of back vowels: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(4): 2350–2357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, S.H. & Kewley-Port, D.
2007Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50: 1241–1255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M.
2009Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 292–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & Coupland, N.
1991Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J.
1991Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In Contexts of Accommodation, H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (eds), 1–68. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J.
2006An acoustic analysis of ‘happY-tensing’ in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34: 439–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Evidence for a relationship between synchronic variability and diachronic change in the Queen’s annual Christmas broadcasts. In Laboratory Phonology 9, J. Cole & J.I. Hualde (eds), 125–143. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Kleber, F. & Reubold, U.
2008Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5): 2825–2835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C.
2000aDoes the Queen speak the Queen’s English? Nature 408: 927–928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000bMonophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30: 63–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Deepening or lessening the divide between diphthongs? An analysis of the Queen’s annual Christmas broadcasts. In A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver, W.J. Hardcastle & J. Beck (eds), 227–261. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson. C.
2007Age-related changes in fundamental frequency and formants: A longitudinal study of four speakers. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2007), 2753–2756. Antwerp: International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Jannedy, S. & Mendoza-Denton, N.
1999Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design, and style. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1389–1392. San Francisco CA: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
2010Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. In The Sociolinguistics Reader, M. Meyerhoff & E. Schleef (eds), 53–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoemeke, K.A. & Diehl, R.L.
1994Perception of vowel height: The role of F1-F0 distance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(2): 661–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howell, P., Barry, W. & Vinson, D.
2006Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions. Perception and Psychophysics 68(1): 139–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, M.
2011Language reversion versus general cognitive decline: Towards a new taxonomy of language change in elderly bilingual immigrants. In Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos – In Honor of Kees de Bot [Studies in Bilingualism 43], M. Schmid & W. Lowie (eds), 221–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
1994Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B.
2001Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, W.J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. & Sundberg, J.
1971Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50(4): 1166–1179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linville, S.E. & Fisher, H.
1985Acoustic characteristics of women’s voices with advancing age. Journal of Gerontology 40(3): 324–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linville, S.E. & Rens, J.
2001Vocal tract resonance analysis of aging voice using long-term average spectra. Journal of Voice 15(3): 323–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liss, J.M., Weismer, G. & Rosenbek, J.C.
1990Selected acoustic characteristics of speech production in very old males. Journal of Gerontology 45(2): 35–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mariën, P., Verslegers, L., Moens, M., Dua, G., Herregods, P. & Verhoeven, J.
2013Posterior fossa syndrome after cerebellar stroke. The Cerebellum 12(5): 686–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mioche, L., Bourdiol, P., Monier, S., Martin, J.-F. & Cormier, D.
2004Changes in jaw muscles activity with age: Effects on food bolus properties. Physiology & Behavior 82(4): 621–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monemi, M., Thornell, L.-E. & Eriksson, P.-O.
1999Diverse changes in fibre type composition of the human lateral pterygoid and digastric muscles during aging. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 171(1): 38–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S.
2006On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2382–2393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 559.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A. & Krauss, R.M.
2012Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40(1): 190–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.E. & Barney, H.L.
1952Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2): 175–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J. & Garrod, S.
2004Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 169–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prescher, P.
2007Identity, immigration and first language attrition. In Language Attrition: Theoretical Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 33], B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (eds), 189–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastatter, M.P. & Jacques, R.D.
1990Formant frequency structure of the aging male and female vocal tract. Folia phoniatrica 42: 312–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reubold, U., Harrington, J. & Kleber, F.
2010Vocal aging effects on F0 and the first formant: A longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication 52(7–8): 638–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roth, E.J., Fink, K., Cherney, L.R. & Hall, K.D.
1997Reversion to a previously learned foreign accent after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(5): 550–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G.
2004Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: Two case studies from “Seven Up”. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical reflections, C. Ford (ed.), 121–139. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Blondeau, H.
2007Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3): 560–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiel, F., Draxler, C. & Harrington, J.
2011Phonemic segmentation and labelling using the MAUS technique. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘New Tools and Methods for Very-Large-Scale Phonetics Research’ , University of Pennsylvania, January 28–31, 2011. http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn​/resolver​.pl​?urn​=nbn:de:bvb:19​-epub​-13684​-8 (21 August 2014).
Scukanec, G., Petrosino, L. & Squibb, K.
1991Formant frequency characteristics of children, young adult, and aged female speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills 73(1): 203–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Syrdal, A.K. & Gopal, H.S.
1986A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79(4): 1086–1100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, H.
1981Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69(5): 1465–1475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991The context sensitivity of the perceptual interaction between f0 and F1. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 5, 62–65. Aix-en-Provence: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
1992Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, M. Pütz (ed.), 361–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M.
1968Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J.C.
1982Accents of English. Cambridge: CUP. Standard lexical sets online: http://​www​.phon​.ucl​.ac​.uk​/home​/wells​/stanlexsets​.htm (21 August 2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.
1905The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Xue, S.A. & Hao, G.J.
2003Changes in the human vocal tract due to aging and the acoustic correlates of speech production: A pilot study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46(3): 689–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xue, S.A., Jiang, J., Lin, E., Glassenberg, R. & Mueller, P.B.
1999Age-related changes in human vocal tract configurations and the effects on speakers’ vowel formant frequencies: A pilot study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 24(3): 132–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar