References (41)
References
Brink, Lars & Lund, Jörn. 1975. Dansk rigsmål. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2013. Connecting attitudes and language behaviour via implicit sociolinguistic cognition. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 307-329.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nik. 2009. Dialects, standards and social change. In Language Attitudes, Standardization and Language Change, Marie Maegaard, Frans Gregersen, Pia Quist & J. Normann Jørgensen (eds),27-49. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Coupland. Nik. 2014. Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization and broadcast British media. In Mediatisation and Sociolinguistic Change, Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), 67–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review 22:211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan & Kristiansen, Tore. 2013. On the need to access deep evaluations when searching for the motor of standard language change. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 9–52.Google Scholar
Jarvad, Pia & Sandøy, Helge(eds). 2007. Stuntman og andre importord i Norden.Om udtale og bøjning [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 7]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Jul Nielsen, Bent & Nyberg, Magda. 1993. Talesprogsvariationen i Odder kommune. II. Yngre og ældre rigsmålsformer i sociolingvistisk belysning. Danske folkemål 35: 249–348.Google Scholar
Kammacher, Louise, Stæhr, Andreas & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2011. Attitudinal and sociostructural factors and their role in dialect change: Testing a model of subjective factors. Language Variation and Change 23:87–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, Keld. 2003. Standard Danish. Copenhagen sociolects, and regional varieties in the 1900s. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:29–43.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Kjeld. 1977. Variationen i vestjysk stationsby-mål. En kvantitativ sociolingvistisk dialektundersøgelse i Vinderup, Ringkøbing Amt. Dialektstudier 4(2): 29–109.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 1990. Udtalenormering i skolen. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
. 1996. Det gode sprogsamfund: det norske eksempel. NyS 21:9–22.Google Scholar
. 2001. Two standards: One for the media and one for the school. Language Awareness 10(1):9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Language attititudes and language politics in Denmark. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159: 57–71.Google Scholar
. 2005. The power of tradition, a study of attitudes towards English in seven Nordic communities.Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37:155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2006. Nordiske sprogholdninger. En masketest. [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 5]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2009. The macro-level social meaning of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41: 167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Conscious and subconscious attitudes towards English Imports in the Nordic countries: evidence for two levels of language ideology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204:59–95.Google Scholar
. 2014. Does mediated language influence immediate language? In Mediatisation and Sociolinguistic Change, Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), 99-126.Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Jens Normann Jørgensen. 2005. Subjective factors in dialect convergence and divergence. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens and Paul Kerswill (eds.), 287–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 1998. Sociolinguistics in Denmark. Sociolinguistica 12:230–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Grondelaers, Stefan (eds). 2013. Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Sandøy, Helge. 2010a. Introduction. The linguistic consequences of globalisation: the Nordic laboratory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204:1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). 2010b. The Linguistic Consequences of Globalization: The Nordic Countries. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Vikør, Lars S. (eds). 2006. Nordiske språkhaldningar. Ei meiningsmåling [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 4]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kvaran, Guðrún (ed.). 2007. Udenlandske eller hjemlige ord? En undersøgelse af sprogene i Norden [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 6]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Lund, Jørn. 1986. Det sprogpolitiske klima i de nordiske lande. Kommentarer og påstande. Sprog i Norden 1986:34–45.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie, Jensen, Torben Juel, Kristiansen, Tore & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2013. Diffusion of language change: Accommodation to a moving target. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(1):3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omdal, Helge & Sandøy, Helge (eds). 2008. Nasjonal eller internasjonal skrivemåte? Om importord i seks nordiske språksamfunn. [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 8]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise. 2003. Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:9–28.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. & Niedzielski, Nancy. 2013. Approaches to the study of language regard. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 287–306.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, Giles, Howard & Hewstone, Miles. 1988. The measurement of language attitudes. In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds), 1068-1081. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge & Kristiansen, Tore. 2010. Conclusion. Globalization and language in the Nordic countries: conditions and consequences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 151–159.Google Scholar
Selback, B. & Sandøy, Helge (eds). 2007.Fire dagar i nordiske aviser. Ei jamføring av påverknaden i ordforrådet i sju språksamfunn. [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 3]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, Paatola, Ulla & Sandøy, Helge. 2010. English influence on the spoken language – with a special focus on its social, semantic and functional conditioning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204:43–58.Google Scholar
Thomas, George. 1991. Linguistic Purism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Vikør, Lars S. 1995. The Nordic Languages. Their Status and Interrelations, 2nd edn. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2010. Language purism in the Nordic countries. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204:9–30.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Wenner, Lena
2024. Chapter 2. A Swedish merger. In The Continuity of Linguistic Change [Studies in Language Variation, 31],  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2020. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2022. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1702 ff. DOI logo
Meer, Philipp, Michael Westphal, Eva Canan Hänsel & Dagmar Deuber
2019. Trinidadian secondary school students’ attitudes toward accents of Standard English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Pharao, Nicolai & Tore Kristiansen
2019. Reflections on the relation between direct/indirect methods and explicit/implicit attitudes. Linguistics Vanguard 5:s1 DOI logo
Prikhodkine, Alexei
2019. Faire « local » avec un accent étranger : entre inclusion et minorisation. Minorités linguistiques et société :12  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Robert M. & Erin Carrie
2018. Implicit–explicit attitudinal discrepancy and the investigation of language attitude change in progress. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39:9  pp. 830 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.