References
Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2007. Linguistic fieldwork: Setting the scene. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(1): 3–11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amery, R. 2009. Phoenix or relic? Documentation of languages with revitalization in mind. Language Documentation and Conservation 3(2): 138–148.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristar, A.R. 2003. The school of best practice. London: SOAS Workshop on Archives for Endangered Languages, November 21–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristar-Dry, H. 2004. E-MELD School of best practices in digital language documentation. Detroit: Presentation at
E-MELD Conference 2004: Workshop on linguistic databases and best practice
, July 15–18.
Austin, P.K. 2006a. Data and language documentation. In Essentials of Language Documentation [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 178], J. Gippert, N. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (eds), 87–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2006b. Defining language documentation. Washington DC: Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics, March.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2007. Survival of languages. In Survival: Darwin College Lectures, E.F. Shuckburgh (ed.), 80–98. Cambridge: CUP. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2008. Training for language documentation: Experiences at the School of Oriental and African Studies. In Documenting and Revitalising Austronesian Languages [Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 1], M. Florey & V. Rau (eds), 25–41. Hawaii HI: University of Hawaii Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2009. Meta-documentary linguistics. Kioloa: Paper given at the Aboriginal languages workshop, March 2009.
Austin, P.K. 2010. Current issues in language documentation. Language Documentation and Description 7, 12–33. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2013. Language documentation and meta-documentation. In Keeping Languages Alive: Documentation, Pedagogy and Revitalization, S. Ogilvie & M. Jones (eds), 3–15. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. 2014. Language documentation in the 21st century. JournaLIPP 3: 57–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. & Grenoble, L. 2007. Current trends in language documentation. Language Documentation and Description 4, 12–25. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. & Sallabank, J. 2014. Endangered Languages: Ideologies and Beliefs in Language Documentation and Revitalization. London: British Academy. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, P.K. & Sallabank, J. 2015. Language documentation and language revitalization: Partners or just good friends? Ms, SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, J. & Bird, S. 2000. Preliminary study of the structure of lexicon entries. Philadelphia: Proceedings of the
Workshop on Web-Based Language Documentation and Description
.
Bentahila, A. & Davies, E.E. 1993. Language revival: Restoration or transformation? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 14(5): 355–374. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bird, S. & Liberman, M. 2001. A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication 33(1–2): 23–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bird, S. & Simons, G. 2003. Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language 79(3): 557–582. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blench, R. 2008. Endangered languages in West Africa. In Language Diversity Endangered, M. Brenzinger (ed.), 140–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowe, C., Hughes, B. & Bird, S. 2003. Towards a general model for interlinear text. Proceedings of EMELD-03, 12 August, 2013. <[URL]>
Bowern, C. 2011. Planning a language documentation project. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, P.K. Austin & J. Sallabank (eds), 459–482. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calvet, J.-L. 2006. Towards an Ecology of World Languages. Cambridge: Polity.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
CELP. 2007. Adequacy of documentation. Document circulated at the
January 2007 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Committee on Endangered Languages and Their Preservation
.
Childs, T., Good, J. & Mitchell, A. 2014. Beyond the ancestral code: Towards a model for sociolinguistic language documentation. Language Documentation and Conservation 8: 168–191.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The Structure of Language, J.A. Fodor & J.J. Katz (eds), 50–118. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coelho, G. 2005. Language documentation and ecology: Areas of interaction. In Language Documentation and Description 3, P.K. Austin (ed.), 63–74. London: SOAS. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cope, L. (ed.). 2014. Applied Linguists Needed: Cross-disciplinary Networking in Endangered Language Contexts. Abingdon: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crowley, T. 2007. Field Linguistics: A Beginners Guide. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dimmendaal, G. 2004. Capacity building in an African context. In Language Documentation and Description 2, P.K. Austin (ed.), 71–89. London: SOAS. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrin, L., Austin, P.K. & Nathan, D. 2007. Dying to be counted: Commodification of endangered languages in documentary linguistics. Language Documentation and Description 6, 37–52. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenbeiss, S. 2005. Psycholinguistic contributions to language documentation. Language Documentation and Description 3, 106–140. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farrar, S. & Langendoen, D.T. 2003a. A linguistic ontology for the semantic web. GLOT International 7(3): 97–100.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farrar, S. & Langendoen, D.T. 2003b. Markup and the GOLD ontology.
Proceedings of EMELD-03
, 12 August 2013. <[URL]>
Farrar, S., Lewis, W.D. & Langendoen, D.T. 2002. A common ontology for linguistic concepts. Seattle WA: Proceedings of the
Knowledge Technologies Conference
, 12 August 2013. <[URL]>
Fillmore, C. 1992. ‘Corpus linguistics’ or ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics, J. Svartik (ed.), 35–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J.A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theory and Practice of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J.A. (ed.). 2001. Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift, Revisited: A 21st Century Perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, E. 2014. Participant driven language archiving. In Language Documentation and Description 12, D. Nathan & P.K. Austin (eds), 68–84. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gawne, L., Kelly, B.F., Berez, A. & Heston, T. 2015. Putting practice into words: Fieldwork methodology in grammatical descriptions. Hawaii: Paper presented at
ICLDC 4 Conference
.
Grant, C. 2014. Music Endangerment: How Language Maintenance Can Help. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grenoble, L.A. 2011. Language ecology and endangerment. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, P.K. Austin & J. Sallabank (eds), 27–45. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grenoble, L.A. & Whaley, L.J. 2006. Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grinevald, C. 2003. Speakers and documentation of endangered languages. Language Documentation and Description 1: 52–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gullberg, M. 2012. Bilingual multimodality and language documentation. In Potentials of Language Documentation: Methods, Analyses, and Utilization [Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 3], F. Seifart, G. Haig, N.P. Himmelmann, D. Jung, A. Margetts & P. Trilsbeek (eds), 46–53. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K., Krauss, M., Watahomigie, L.J., Yamamoto, A.Y., Craig, C., Jeanne, L.M. & England, N.C. 1992. Endangered languages. Language 68(1): 1–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harrison, K.D. 2005. Ethnographically informed language documentation. Documentation and Description 3, 22–41. London: SOAS,![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugen, E. 1972. The Ecology of Language. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36: 161–195. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P. 2002. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. In Lectures on Endangered Languages, Vol. V, O. Sakiyama & F. Endo (eds), 37–83. Kyoto: Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim,![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P. 2006. Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In Essentials of Language Documentation [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 178], J. Gippert, N.P. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P. 2008. Reproduction and preservation of linguistic knowledge: Linguistics’ response to language endangerment. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 337–350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P. 2012. Linguistic data types and the interface between language documentation and description. Language Documentation and Conservation 6: 187–207.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinton, L. 1993. Flutes of Fire. Berkeley CA: Heyday Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinton, L. 2002. How to Keep your Language Alive. Berkeley CA: Heyday Books![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinton, L. 2011. Revitalization of endangered languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, P.K. Austin & J. Sallabank (eds), 291–311. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinton, L. 2013. Bringing Our Languages Home: Language Revitalization for Families. Berkeley CA: Heyday Books![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinton, L. & Hale, K. (eds). 2001. The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. San Diego CA: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holton, G. 2014. Mediating language documentation. In Language Documentation and Description 12, B. Nathan & P.K. Austin (eds), 37–52. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornberger, N.H. 2010. Language shift and language revitalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, R.B. Kaplan (ed.), 365–373. Oxford: OUP. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hymes, D. 1964. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66(6): 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kapono, E. 1995. Hawaiian language revitalization and immersion education. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 112: 121. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroskrity, P.V. 2015. Designing a dictionary for an endangered language community: Lexicographical deliberations, language ideological clarifications. Language Documentation and Conservation 9: 140–157.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C. 2001. Language documentation: A program. In Aspects of Typology and Universals, W. Bisang (ed.), 83–97. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linn, M.-A. 2014. Living archives: A community-based language archive model. In Language Documentation and Description 12, D. Nathan & P.K. Austin (eds), 53–67. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lüpke, F. 2009. Data collection methods for field-based language documentation. In Language Documentation and Description 6, P.K. Austin (ed.), 53–100. London: SOAS. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lüpke, F. & Storch, A. 2013. Repertoires and Choices in African Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mühlhäusler, P. 1992. Preserving languages or language ecologies? A top-down approach to language survival. Oceanic Linguistics 31(2): 163–180. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mühlhäusler, P. 2000. Language planning and language ecology. Current Issues in Language Planning 1(3): 306–367. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. 2004. Documentary linguistics: Alarm bells and whistles? Seminar presentation,
SOAS
. 23 November 2004.
Nathan, D. 2006. Sound and unsound documentation: Questions about the roles of audio in language documentation. Washington DC: Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. 2009. The soundness of documentation: Towards an epistemology for audio in documentary linguistics. Journal of the International Association of Sound Archives 33. <[URL]> (22 March 2012).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. 2010a. Sound and unsound practices in documentary linguistics: Towards an epistemology for audio. Language Documentation and Description 7, 1–17. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. 2010b. Archives 2.0 for endangered languages: From disk space to MySpace. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 4(1–2): 111–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. 2014. Access and accessibility at ELAR, an archive for endangered languages documentation. In Language Documentation and Description 12, D. Nathan & P.K. Austin (eds), 187–208. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nathan, D. & Austin, P.K. 2004. Reconceiving metadata: Language documentation through thick and thin. In Language Documentation and Description 2, P.K. Austin (ed.), 179–187. London: SOAS. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, P. 2009. Fieldwork and fieldmethods in linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation 3(1): 113–125.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, P. 2013. The law of unintended consequences: How the endangered languages movement undermines field linguistics as a scientific enterprise. Seminar presented at
SOAS
, 15th October.
Penton, D., Bow, C., Bird, S. & Hughes, B. 2004. Towards a general model for linguistic paradigms. In
Proceedings of EMELD-04
, 12 August 2013. <[URL]>
Robins, R.H. & Uhlenbeck, E.M. 1991. Endangered Languages. New York NY: Berg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romaine, S. 2007. Preserving endangered languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(1–2): 115–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sallabank, J. 2012. From language documentation to language planning: Not necessarily a direct route. In Potentials of Language Documentation: Methods, Analyses, and Utilization [Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 3], F. Seifart, G. Haig, N.P. Himmelmann, D. Jung, A. Margetts & P. Trilsbeek (eds), 118–125. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sallabank, J. 2013. Endangered Languages: Attitudes, Identities and Policies. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2006. Linguistic annotation. In Essentials of Language Documentation, J. Gippert, N.P. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (eds), 213–251. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seifart, F. 2008. The representativeness of language documentations. Language Documentation and Description 5, 60–76. London: SOAS,![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sherzer, J. 1987. A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist 89(2): 295–309. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spolsky, B. 1989. Maori bilingual education and language revitalization. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 10(2): 89–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spolsky, B. 2003. Reassessing Maori regeneration. Language in Society 32: 553–578. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sugita, Y. 2007. Language revitalization or language fossilization? Some suggestions for language documentation from the viewpoint of interactional linguistics. In Proceedings of First Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, P.K. Austin, O. Bond & D. Nathan (eds), 243–250. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thieberger, N. 2012. Counting collections. Paradisec Blog, 29 November 2012. <[URL]> (6 June 2015).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thieberger, N., Margetts, A., Morey, S., Musgrave, S. & Schembri, A. 2012. Assessing curated corpora as research output. Paper presented to the
Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society
, University of Western Australia.
Whalen, D. 2013. Response to Paul Newman. Blog post dated 3 December 2013. <[URL]> (27 March 2015).
Woodbury, T. 2003. Defining documentary linguistics. Language Documentation and Description 1, 35–51. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodbury, T. 2011. Language documentation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, P.K. Austin & J. Sallabank (eds), 159–186. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodbury, A.C. 2014. Archives and audiences: Toward making endangered language documentations people can read, use, understand, and admire. In Language Documentation and Description, 12: Special Issue on Language Documentation and Archiving, D. Nathan & P.K. Austin (eds), 19–36. London: SOAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamada, R.-M. 2007. Collaborative linguistic fieldwork: Practical application of the empowerment model. Language Documentation and Conservation 1(2): 257–282.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)