Cover not available
Part of
Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 42] 2016
► pp. 361–386

Redefining priorities, methods and standards in endangered-language lexicography

From lexical erosion in Palikur to areal lexicography

| University of Orléans
| University of Orléans
Based on our ten-year fieldwork on Palikur (Arawakan) in French Guyana, this paper discusses the need for researchers (assisted by native speakers) to devote more time and energy to documenting the lexicons of endangered languages (EL) and the urgency to focus on the parts of the lexicon that are subject to strong lexical erosion, in order to allow the transmission of saved knowledge to younger generations. It also describes the main difficulties in documenting these sections of the lexicon and advocates the need for new principles, methods and standards in EL lexicography so as to obtain more complete and satisfactory information for interdisciplinary work, for tool, knowledge and content sharing, and finally for dismissing an all-or-nothing approach according to which incomplete lexicographical descriptions and knowledge should not be published.
Keywords: Amazonia, biolexicon, dictionary, documentation, endangered language/s, lexical erosion, lexicography, lexicon, Palikur, transmission
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.42.16nem
References (11)
References
Cristinoi, A. & Nemo, F. 2013. Challenges in endangered language lexicography. Lexicography and Dictionaries in the Information Age, 126–132. Denpassar: Airlangga University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. & Green, H. 2010. Yuwit Kawihka Dicionário Palikúr – Português. Belem : SIL.Google Scholar
Grenand, F. 1989. Dictionnaire Wayãpi-Français, Lexique Français-Wayãpi. Paris: Peeters/Selaf.Google Scholar
. (ed.). 2009. Encyclopédies Palikur, Wayana, Wayãpi: Langue, milieu et histoire, fascicule encyclopédie des Amérindiens de Guyane. Paris: PUO-CTHS.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R.R.K. 2003. Lexicography: Critical Concepts. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klimpp, D.A. 1995. Vocabulario Piapoco-Español. Bogotá: Asociación Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Launey, M. 2003. Awna Parikwaki. Introduction à la Langue Palikur de Guyane et de l’Amapa. Paris: IRD Éditions.Google Scholar
Mosel, U. 2011. Lexicography in endangered language communities. In The Handbook of Endangered Languages, P.K. Austin & J. Sallabank (eds), 337–353. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schauer, J.G., Schauer, S., Yukuna, E. & Yukuna, W. 2005. Meke Kemakánaka Purákaʔaloji: wapuraʔakó chu, eyá Karíwana chu (Diccionario Bilingüe: Yukuna – Español; Español – Yukuna). Bogota: Editorial Fundación para el Desarollo de los Pueblos Marginados.Google Scholar
Urquía Sebastián, R. & Urquía Sebastián, W. 2008. Diccionario yine–castellano (parcial). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cance, Caroline
2021. Chapter 3. Experiencing and talking about colors. In Sensory Experiences [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 24], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.