Chapter 5
Us, them and all the others
Analyzing belonging among Japanese immigrant women in The Netherlands
This study examines the linguistic practices of a group of Japanese immigrant women temporarily living in Amstelveen, and their ways of constructing belonging. Taking as an example three linguistic variables: (i) personal pronouns ‘I’ and ‘we’; (ii) specific ethnic labels (single self-referring label Nihonjin ‘The Japanese’ versus multiple labels Orandajin, Oranda no hito/hitotachi, Orandajin no hito/hitotachi, Oranda ‘The Dutch’); and (iii) the use of non-standard Osaka Japanese negation I discuss how speakers in this group (re)create various boundaries, and how they draw on ‘us’ versus ‘them’ dichotomy as a way of achieving group cohesion.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Constructing belonging
- Ethnographic background
- ‘Japan on the Amstel’
- The Club
- Participants
- Data and methods
- Language resources as means for indexing belonging
- Personal pronouns: From ‘I’ to ‘we’
-
Ethnic labels
- The use of standard and non-standard negation
- Discussion and conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References
Anderson, B.
1983 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Antonsisch, M.
2010 Searching for belonging – An analytical framework.
Geography Compass 4: 644–659.
Barth, F.
1969 Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Blommaert, J.
2007 On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 682–688.
De Fina, A.
2000 Orientation in immigrant narratives: The role of ethnicity in the identification of characters.
Discourse Studies 2:131–157.
Duranti, A.
1997 Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: CUP.
Geschiere, P.
2009 The Perils of Belonging: Autochtony, Citizenship and Exclusion in Africa & Europe. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Giles, H., Bourhis R. Y. & Taylor D. M.
1977 Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In
Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations,
H. Giles (ed.), 307–348. London: Academic Press.
Matsumoto, K. & Britain, D.
(
2003)
Contact and obsolescence in a diaspora variety of Japanese: The case of Palau in Micronesia.
Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 44: 38–75.
Meinhoff, U. & Galasinski D.
2000 The Language of Belonging. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ochs, E.
1992 Indexing gender. In
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon,
A. Duranti &
C. Goodwin (eds), 335–358. Cambridge: CUP.
Onoe, K.
1999 Osaka kotoba gaku. Tokyo: Sogensha.
Shibatani, M.
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.
Strycharz-Banaś, A.
2016 In-group marker going out: Meaning making in a community of practice.
Language in Society 45(5): 665–684.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.
1979 An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In
The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,
W. G. Austin &
S. Worchel (eds), 33–47. Monterey CA: Brooks & Cole.
Wodak, R.
1999 Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 185–193.
Yuval-Davis, N.
2006 Belonging and the politics of belonging.
Patterns of Prejudice 40(3): 197–214.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Ilbury, Christian
2022.
A tale of two cities: The discursive construction of ‘place’ in gentrifying East London.
Language in Society 51:3
► pp. 511 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.