Chapter published in:
The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging: Perspectives from the margins
Edited by Leonie Cornips and Vincent A. de Rooij
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 45] 2018
► pp. 89–112

Chapter 5. Us, them and all the others

Analyzing belonging among Japanese immigrant women in The Netherlands

| Victoria University of Wellington

This study examines the linguistic practices of a group of Japanese immigrant women temporarily living in Amstelveen, and their ways of constructing belonging. Taking as an example three linguistic variables: (i) personal pronouns ‘I’ and ‘we’; (ii) specific ethnic labels (single self-referring label Nihonjin ‘The Japanese’ versus multiple labels Orandajin, Oranda no hito/hitotachi, Orandajin no hito/hitotachi, Oranda ‘The Dutch’); and (iii) the use of non-standard Osaka Japanese negation I discuss how speakers in this group (re)create various boundaries, and how they draw on ‘us’ versus ‘them’ dichotomy as a way of achieving group cohesion.

Published online: 07 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.45.05ban
References

References

Anderson, B.
1983 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Antonsisch, M.
2010 Searching for belonging – An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4: 644–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F.
1969 Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2007 On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 682–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A.
2000 Orientation in immigrant narratives: The role of ethnicity in the identification of characters. Discourse Studies 2:131–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A.
1997 Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geschiere, P.
2009 The Perils of Belonging: Autochtony, Citizenship and Exclusion in Africa & Europe. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis R. Y. & Taylor D. M.
1977 Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, H. Giles (ed.), 307–348. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. & Britain, D.
(2003) Contact and obsolescence in a diaspora variety of Japanese: The case of Palau in Micronesia. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 44: 38–75.Google Scholar
Meinhoff, U. & Galasinski D.
2000 The Language of Belonging. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
1992 Indexing gender. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds), 335–358. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Onoe, K.
1999 Osaka kotoba gaku. Tokyo: Sogensha.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Strycharz-Banaś, A.
2016 In-group marker going out: Meaning making in a community of practice. Language in Society 45(5): 665–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.
1979 An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds), 33–47. Monterey CA: Brooks & Cole.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
1999 Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 185–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N.
2006 Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40(3): 197–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Jaspers, Jürgen
2018.  In The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 45], ► pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.