Chapter published in:
Talking about Food: The social and the global in eating communities
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 47] 2020
► pp. 35–56

Chapter 3
The moral taste of food

A discourse analysis of social media discussions about vegetarianism and veganism

| University of Bayreuth
This paper analyses discussions about vegetarianism and veganism in francophone social media groups where moral statements play an important role. It sketches a communicative conception of morality as ‘doing ethics’ that zooms in on how morality emerges and is negotiated in interaction by concentrating on linguistic practices that key morality. Based on two case studies, it examines controversies about moral values of food which offer insights in the more general machinery of moral discourse. The data reveal different linguistic techniques which are frequent in, although not specific to, moral discourse. In particular, these are evaluations, pejorative or upgrading lexicon, deontic modality, generalisations, typical speech acts like advice or instruction as well as semantic and structural forms of intensification.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vegetarianism and veganism
  • 3.Doing ethics
  • 4.Data
    • 4.1Data collection
    • 4.2Contextualization of the social media discussions
  • 5.Two case studies: Honey and French fries
    • 5.1Is honey health food?
    • 5.2Are French fries junk food?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.03dre
References
Bergmann, J.
2004 Moralisierung und Moralisierungsdistanz. Über einige Gefahren der moralischen Kommunikation in der modernen Gesellschaft. In Moral als Gift oder Gabe? Zur Ambivalenz von Moral und Religion [Interpretation Interdisziplinär 1], B. Boothe & P. Stoellger (eds), 24–44. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Bergmann, J. & Luckmann, T.
1999 Moral und Kommunikation. In Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation [Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral 1], J. Bergmann & T. Luckmann (eds), 13–36. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Das, V.
2012 Ordinary ethics. In A Companion to Moral Anthropology [Blackwell Companions to Anthropology 20], D. Fassin (ed.), 133–149. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, M.
2000 La réduplication: Formes et fonctions. In Diskursanalyse. Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch. Akten der gleichnamigen Sektion des 1. Kongresses des Franko-Romanisten-Verbands, B. Wehr & H. Thomaßen (eds), 57–74. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2003 Sprachliche Affektivität: Darstellung emotionaler Beteiligung am Beispiel von Gesprächen aus dem Französischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Contextualizing local knowledge: Reformulations in HIV/AIDS prevention in Burkina Faso. In Language and HIV/AIDS [Critical Language and Literacy Studies 5], C. Higgins & B. Norton (eds), 197–213. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Farge, S.
2019 Le discours végétal des chefs: Vers une nouvelle légitimité? In La gastronomie à l’ère numérique. Regards linguistiques et économiques sur l’Allemagne, la France et l’Italie [Stauffenburg Romanistik 3], J. Cadeddu, M. Kauffer & Y. Keromnes (eds), 243–260. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Fassin, D.
2012 Introduction: Toward a critical moral anthropology. In A Companion to Moral Anthropology [Blackwell Companions to Anthropology 20], D. Fassin (ed.), 1–17. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischler, C.
1990/2001 L’Homnivore. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
1996 Alimentation morale et société. In Identités des mangeurs. Images des aliment, I. Giachetti (ed.), 31–54. Paris: Polytechnica.Google Scholar
Food Porn
n.d. Wikipedia, https://​en​.wikipedia​.org​/wiki​/Food​_porn (22 October 2019).
Günthner, S.
2000 Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keppler, A. & Luckmann, T.
1991 ‘Teaching’: Conversational transmission of knowledge. In Asymmetries in Dialogue, I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds), 143–165. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf/Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Lambek, M.
2015 The Ethical Condition. Essays on Action, Person & Value. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardellier, P.
2014 Cuisiner, manger, et en parler… Le Discours et la Langue 6(2): 7–14.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N.
2008 Soziologie der Moral. In Die Moral der Gesellschaft [Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch 1871], N. Luhmann (ed.), 56–162. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mariscal, V. & Aucuit, N.
2014 Du mangeur vertueux au ‚locavore’. Un panorama des discours prescriptifs sur les pratiques alimentaires du XIVème au XXIème siècle. Le Discours et la Langue 6(2): 49–62.Google Scholar
Ouédraogo, A.
2005 Crise sociale, crise du goût: Le végétarisme comme issue. Une étude de cas en région parisienne. INRA Sciences Sociales 3: 1–4.Google Scholar
Paveau, M.-A.
2013 Langage et morale: Une éthique des vertus discursives. Limoges: Éditions Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Riepl, W.
2013 Verbreitung des Vegetarismus in ausgewählten Ländern. Statistik Dresden 26 September 2013 <https://​statistik​-dresden​.de​/archives​/tag​/vegetarier (4 April 2018).Google Scholar
Sidnell, J.
2011 The ordinary ethics of everyday talk. In Ordinary Ethics, Anthropology, Language, and Action, M. Lambek (ed.), 123–139. New York NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Bennett, J.
2018 Moral Talk: Stance and Evaluation in Political Discourse. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traïni, C.
2012 Entre dégoût et indignation morale, sociogenèse d’une pratique militante. Revue Française de Science Politique 62: 559–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar