Chapter in:
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021

Case-marking in Semitic in the light of the evidence in the Ethiopian language area

Linguistic convergence and divergence

| University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
Languages in the Ethiopian language area typically exhibit a two-case system from a morphological point of view. This paper discusses the question as to how this observation can be aligned with the circumstance that, for Semitic in general, a three-case system is usually reconstructed. It will be argued that case endings can also emerge in a secondary process, as is widely recognised in typological linguistics, and that the cyclicity observed in this context can well be framed in terms of processes of linguistic convergence and divergence. Thereby, both the morphological aspects of case as well as the thematic roles of case will be discussed.
Keywords: Amharic, Afroasiatic, Arabic, Berber, case, convergence, Cushitic, Gəʿəz, Hebrew, Omotic, re-analysis, thematic roles
References

References

Al-Jallad, Ahmad & van Putten, Marijn
2017 The case for Proto-Semitic and Proto-Arabic case: A reply to Jonathan Owens. Romano-Arabica 17: 87–117.Google Scholar
Appleyard, David
2011 Semitic-Cushitic/Omotic relations. In Weninger et al. (eds), 38–53.Google Scholar
2012 Cushitic. In Semitic and Afroasiatic: Challenges and Opportunities, Lutz Edzard (ed.), 199–206. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Azeb, Amha
2012 Omotic. In The Afroasiatic Languages, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 423–504. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Birkeland, Hans
1952 Growth and structure of the Egyptian Arabic dialect. Avhandlinger utgitt av det norske Videnskaps-Akademi 1: 1–57.Google Scholar
Blau, Joshua
1969 Some problems of the formation of the Old Semitic languages in the light of Arabic dialects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies, 38–44. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Butts, Aaron Michael
2019 Gəʿəz (Classical Ethiopic). In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 117–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cassuto, Philippe
2018 De quelques traces de désinences casuelles et modales en hébreu biblique. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 24–44. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Chaker, Salem
2018 Les marques obligatoire du nom et l’état d’annexion en berbere: Diachronie et reconstruction en contexte de langue de tradition orale. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 162–183. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Crass, Joachim
2005 Das K’abeena. Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandkuschitischen Sprache. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Corriente, Federico
1971 On the functional yield of some synthetic devices in Arabic and Semitic morphology. Jewish Quarterly Review 62: 20–50.Google Scholar
Diem, Werner
1981 Untersuchungen zur frühen Geschichte der arabischen Orthographie, III: Endungen und Endschreibungen. Orientalia 50: 332–383.Google Scholar
1991 Vom Altarabischen zum Neuarabischen. Ein neuer Ansatz. Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, Alan Kaye (ed.), 297–308. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2014 Marked Nominative Systems in Eastern Sudanic and Their Historical Origin. Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Edzard, Lutz
1998 Polygenesis, Convergence and Entropy: An Alternative Model of Linguistic Evolution as Applied to Semitic Linguistics. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2016 Experiencer constructions and the resultative function of impersonal verbs in Ethio-Semitic. In Time in Languages of the Horn of Africa, Ronny Meyer & Lutz Edzard (eds), 138–156. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2018a The opposition ‘nominative’ vs. ‘absolutive’ case in a Semitic perspective. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 184–203. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2018b The marked nominative in Arabic, Semitic, and Afroasiatic. In Re-engaging Comparative Semitic and Arabic Studies, Daniel Birnstiel & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 105–126. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2019 Amharic. In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 202–226. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elmedlaoui, Mohamed
2012 Berber. In Semitic and Afroasiatic: Challenges and Opportunities, Lutz Edzard (ed.), 13–198. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
al-Farrāʾ, Yaḥyā ibn Ziyād
1983 Maʿānī al-Qurʾān, ed. by Muḥammad ʿAlī an-Najjār & ʾAḥmad Yūsuf Najātī. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
1960 The Arabic koine. Language 35: 616–630.Google Scholar
Fück, Johann
1950 Arabiya. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace
1965 The origin of the West-Semitic qatala morpheme. In Symbolae Linguisticae in Honorem Georgii Kuryłowicz, Witold Taszycki (ed.), 72–80. Krakow: Polska Akademia.Google Scholar
Handschuh, Corinna
2014 A Typology of Marked-S Languages. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2009 Terminology of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasselbach, Rebecca
2013 Case in Semitic: Roles, Relations and Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hayward, Dick
1984 The Arbore Language. A First Investigation. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John
2019 Proto-Semitic. In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 117–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Idasiak, Amandine
2018 Évolution du système casuel et de la mimation dans la langue akkadienne. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 11–23. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kahr, Joan
1976 The renewal of case morphology: Sources and constraints. Stanford Working Papers on Language Universals 20: 107–151.Google Scholar
König, Christa
2009 Marked nominatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 535–548. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2009 Evolution of case systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 439–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lamberti, Marcello & Sottile, Roberto
1997 The Wolaytta Language. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985a Latin case relations in typological perspective. Syntaxe et Latin (Actes du IIème congrès international de linguistique latine), Aix-en-Provence 1985, Christian Touratier (ed.), 81–104. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
1985b Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf
1995 Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher
2007 Jespersen’s cycle in Arabic and Berber. Transactions of the Philological Society 105(3): 398–431.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten
2012 Cushitic. In The Afroasiatic Languages, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 342–422. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor
1862 Hebräische Sprache. Book review of Lehrbuch der hebräischen Sprache by J. Olshausen (1861). Orient und Occident 1: 755–764.Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan
1985 A Grammar of Harar Oromo (Northeastern Ethiopia). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
1998 Case and Proto-Arabic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 61: 51–73; 217–227.Google Scholar
2018 Where multiple pathways lead: A reply to Ahmad Al-Jallad and Marijn van Putten. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 96–161. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Pisani, Vittorio
1952 Parenté linguistique. Lingua 3: 3–16.Google Scholar
Rabin, Chaim
1969 The structure of the Semitic system of case endings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies Held in Jerusalem, 19–23 July 1965, 190–204. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities.Google Scholar
Retsö, Jan
1997 State and plural marking in Semitic. In Built on Solid Rock: Studies in honour of Professor Ebbe Egede Knudsen on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday April 11th 1997, Elie Wardini (ed.), 268–282. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
2006 Thoughts about the diversity of Arabic. In Current Issues in the Analysis of Semitic Grammar and Lexicon II, Lutz Edzard & Jan Retsö (eds), 23–33. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1984 Case in Cushitic, Semitic, and Berber. In Current Progress in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics, Papers of the Third International Hamito-Semitic Congress, London, 1978 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 28], John Bynon (ed.), 111–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Streck, Michael P.
2000 Das amurritische Onomastikon der altbabylonischen Zeit, Band 1. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
2011 Amorite. In Weninger et al. (eds), 452–459.Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro
1994 On case marking in the Ethiopian language area. In Sem, Cam, Iafet: Atti della 7a Giornata di Studi Camito-Semitici e Indoeuropei, Vermondo Brugnatelli (ed.), 225–244. Milan: Centro studi camito-semitici.Google Scholar
Tropper, Josef
2000 Der altäthiopische Status constructus auf -a aus sprachvergleichender Sicht. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 90: 201–218.Google Scholar
2002 Altäthiopisch. Grammatik des Ge‘ez mit Übungstexten und Glossar. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Cornelis H. M.
1981 A dissenting grammarian: Quṭrub on declension. Historiographia Linguistica 8: 403–429.Google Scholar
Waltisberg, Michael
2002 Zur Ergativitätshypothese im Semitischen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 152: 11–62.Google Scholar
2011 The case functions in Amorite: A re-evaluation. Journal of Semitic Studies 56: 19–36.Google Scholar
Weninger, Stefan
2011 Old Ethiopic. In Weninger et al. (eds), 1124–1142.Google Scholar
Weninger, Stefan, Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. & Watson, Janet
(eds) 2011 The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook [Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft 36]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Zaborski, Andrzej
1990 Preliminary remarks on case morphemes in Omotic. In Omotic Language Studies, Richard J. Hayward (ed.), 617–629. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar