Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union
Edited by Diana Forker and Lenore A. Grenoble
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 50] 2021
► pp. 85–118

Enets-Russian language contact

 | Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
This paper explores the topic of Enets-Russian language contact from two perspectives: via a thorough description of sociolinguistic details of the contact (based on sociolinguistic interviews performed by the author in 2017, complemented by ethnographic data from the 1920s–1940s) and via an overview of its linguistic consequences for the lexicon, phonology, syntax, and discourse structures of Enets (based on an extensive corpus of Enets speech). All consecutive stages of Enets-Russian interaction are described: very limited contacts with Russian (before the end of the 1930s), start of the russification campaign (1940s–1950s), a transitional period (1960s), and the victory of Russian (from the 1970s onwards). Then all known instances of linguistic traces of this interaction for Enets are summarized. They represent both instances of negative borrowing (loss of phonotactic restrictions in phonology, reduced frequency of complex structures in subordination) and positive borrowing (loanwords, new phonemes, reduction as added phonetic realizations of some vowel phonemes, clause-combining strategies involving Russian conjunctions). Overall, the linguistic changes that Enets has undergone under the influence of Russian are not numerous, in particular if the lexicon is set aside, and this is explained by the very limited duration of the transition period, when both languages were in active use by the same individuals.
Keywords: language contact, Enets, Russian, historical sociolinguistics, borrowing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Language and its speakers
    • 1.2Data and methods
  • 2.Sociolinguistic details of the Enets-Russian language contact
    • 2.1Before the end of the 1930s: Very limited contacts with Russian
    • 2.2The 1940s–1950s: Start of the russification campaign
    • 2.3The 1960s: The transition period
    • 2.4The 1970s: The victory of Russian
    • 2.5Summarizing the history of the Enets-Russian language contact
  • 3.Linguistic traces of Enets-Russian contact in Enets
    • 3.1Lexicon
      • 3.1.1Old vs. recent loanwords
      • 3.1.2Content vs. functional loanwords
    • 3.2Phonetics and phonology
    • 3.3Syntax
    • 3.4Discourse
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.50.04kha
References (34)
References
Andersen, R. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In R. D. Lambert & B. F. Freed (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 83–118). Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Anikin, A. E. (1997). Ètimologičeskij slovarʹ russkix zaimstvovanij v jazykax Sibiri [Etymological dictionary of Russian loanwords in the languages of Siberia]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, N. (2013). How to study multilingualism of the past: Investigating traditional contact situations in Daghestan. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(3), 376–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolgix, B. O. (1949). Kolxoz imeni Kirova Tajmyrskogo nacionalʹnogo okruga [Kirov collective farm named of the Taimyr National District]. Sovetskaja ètnografija, 4, 87–93.Google Scholar
(1961). Mifologičeskie skazki i istoričeskie predanija èncev [Enets myths and historical legends]. Moscow: Izdatelʹstvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
(1962). Bytovye rasskazy èncev [Everyday Enets stories]. Moscow: Izdatelʹstvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Gruzdeva, E. (2007). Jazykovaja attricija v sisteme jazykovyx izmenenij [Language attrition in the system of language change]. In N. B. Vakhtin (Ed.), Jazykovye izmenenija v uslovijax jazykovogo sdviga [Language change caused by language shift] (pp. 16–58). St. Petersburg: Nestor.Google Scholar
Gusev, V. (2013). Istorija govorki (russkogo tajmyrskogo pidžina) po lingvističeskim dannym [The history of Govorka (Russian Taimyr pidgin) based on linguistic evidence]. Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii, 1, 135–157.Google Scholar
Helimski, E. (2007). Fonetika i morfologija èneckogo jazyka v uslovijax jazykovogo sdviga [Enets phonetics and morphology in the condition of a language shift]. In N. B. Vakhtin (Ed.), Jazykovye izmenenija v uslovijax jazykovogo sdviga [Language change caused by language shift] (pp. 213–224). St. Petersburg: Nestor.Google Scholar
n.d. Materialy k slovarju èneckogo jazyka [Materials for an Enets dictionary] (Unpublished manuscript).
Janhunen, J. (2009). Proto-Uralic – What, where, and when? The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, 258, 57–78.Google Scholar
Jones, M. C., & Singh, I. (2005). Exploring language change. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khanina, O. (2016). Sočinitelʹnye strategii èneckogo jazyka [Coordination strategies in Enets]. Uralo-Altaic Studies, 21, 131–148.Google Scholar
(2018). Documenting a language with phonemic and phonetic variation: The case of Enets. Language Documentation and Conservation, 12, 430–460.Google Scholar
Khanina, O., Koryakov, Y., & Shluinsky, A. 2018. Enets in space and time: A case-study in linguistic geography. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen, 42, 109-135.Google Scholar
Khanina, O., & Shluinsky, A. (In press). Forest and Tundra Enets. In D. Abondolo & R. L. Valijärvi (Eds.), The Uralic languages (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Matras, Y. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ovsjannikova, M., & Khanina, O. (2018). Čto proisxodit s jazykom, kogda na nem perestajut govoritʹ? (dannye nefinitnyx form lesnogo dialekta èneckogo jazyka) [What happens to a language when it stops being used? (Evidence from Forest Enets non-finite forms)]. In K. P. Semenova (Ed.), Malye jazyki v bolʹšoj lingvistike [Minor languages in major linguistics] (pp. 151–158). Moscow: MGU.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sasse, H. J. (1992). Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa (pp. 59–80). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salminen, T. (1997). A key to Enets morphology (Morphologisches Wörterbuch des Enzischen von Tibor Mikola.). Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 54, 213–219.Google Scholar
(2007). Europe and North Asia. In C. Moseley (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the world’s endangered languages (pp. 211–282). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siegl, F. (2008). Izmenenija v jazyke lesnyx Èncev [Changes in the language of the Forest Enets]. Naučnyj vestnik Jamalo-Neneckogo avtonomnogo okruga, 6(58), 3–12.Google Scholar
(2013a). Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
(2013b). The Sociolinguistic status quo on the Taimyr Peninsula. Études Finno-ougriennes, 45, 239–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. (2005). Taimyr Pidgin Russian (Govorka). Russian Linguistics, 29, 289–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Taimyr-Pidgin-Russisch: Kolonialer Sprachkontakt in Nordsibirien [Taimyr Pidgin Russian: Colonial language contact in Northern Siberia]. München: Verlag Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoynova, N., & Shluinsky, A. (2010). Russkaja rečʹ lesnyx èncev: zarisovki issledovatelej vymirajuščego jazyka [Russian speech of the Forest Enets: Sketches of linguists documenting a moribund language]. Slavica Helsingiensia, 20, 153–165.Google Scholar
Tereščenko, N. M. (1953). O russkix vlijanijax na neneckij jazyk (na material leksiki) [On Russian influence onto Nenets (evidence from lexicon)]. In Učenye zapiski LGU 157, Fakulʹtet narodov severa, vyp. 2 (Jazyki i istorija narodnostej krajnego severa SSSR) [Research notes of Leningrad State University 157, Faculty of peoples of the North, Vol. 2 (Languages and history of circumpolar peoples of USSR)] (pp. 60–83). Leningrad: Izdatelʹstvo LGU.Google Scholar
Urmanchieva, A. (2010). Govorka: primer strukturno smešannogo jazyka [Govorka: An example of a structurally mixed language]. Slavica Helsingiensia, 40, 179–198.Google Scholar
Vasilʹev, V. I. (1963). Lesnye èncy (očerk istorii, xozjajstva i kulʹtury) [Forest Enets (an essay of history, economy, and culture)]. In N. N. Mikluxo-Maklaj (Ed.), Sibirskij Ètnografičeskij Sbornik V [Siberian Ethnographic Collection] (pp. 33–70). Moscow: Izdatelʹstvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
(1970). Nency i èncy Tajmyrskogo nacionalʹnogo okruga [The Nenets and the Enets of the Taimyr national district]. In I. S. Gurvič & B. O. Dolgix (Eds.), Preobrazovanija v xozjajstve i kulʹture i ètničeskie processy u narodov Severa [Changes in economy and culture, and ethnic processes by the peoples of the North] (pp. 108–163). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vasilʹev, V. I., & Simčenko, J. B. (1963). Sovremennoe samodijskoe naselenie Tajmyra [Modern Samoyedic inhabitants of Taimyr], Sovetskaja Ètnografija, 3, 9–20.Google Scholar
Vasilʹev, V. I., & Tugolukov, V. A. (1960). Ètnografičeskie issledovanija na Tajmyre v 1959 godu [Ethnographic studies on Taimyr in 1959]. Sovetskaja Ètnografija, 5, 128–141.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Forker, Diana & Lenore A. Grenoble
2021. Some structural similarities in the outcomes of language contact with Russian. In Language contact in the territory of the former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Khanina, Olesya
2021. Languages and ideologies at the Lower Yenisei (Siberia): Reconstructing past multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:4 ► pp. 1059 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.