Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union
Edited by Diana Forker and Lenore A. Grenoble
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 50] 2021
► pp. 119–142

Izhma Komi in Western Siberia

At the crossroads of language contact

| V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the RAS | Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS
| National Research University Higher School of Economics
This paper considers contact-induced change in Izhma Komi subdialects spoken in Western Siberia. We focus on the interaction of Izhma Komi, first, with Russian and, second, with the indigenous Siberian languages (Nenets and to a lesser extent Khanty). The main emphasis is on the phenomena of pattern borrowing at various language levels, which mostly remained beyond previous studies. For instance, these include the borrowing of some phonotactic patterns, the copying of polysemy patterns, and changes in the properties of some grammatical constructions. We discuss how in each case the degree of contact-induced change depends on the sociolinguistic situation.
Keywords: Uralic languages, Izhma Komi, Nenets, Khanty, Russian, contact-induced change, loan translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sociolinguistic situation
  • 3.Influence of Russian
    • 3.1Phonetics
    • 3.2Loan translations
    • 3.3Grammar
  • 4.Influence of Nenets and Khanty
    • 4.1Phonetics
    • 4.2Loan translations
    • 4.3Grammar
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations (different from the Leipzig Glossing Rules)
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.50.05kas
References (50)
References
Beznosikova, L. (Ed.). (2012). Slovarʹ dialektov komi jazyka [Dictionary of Komi dialects] (Vol. 1). Syktyvkar: Kola.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2014). Slovar’ dialektov komi jazyka [Dictionary of Komi dialects] (Vol. 2). Syktyvkar: Kola.Google Scholar
Blokland, R., & Rießler, M. (2011). Komi-Saami-Russian contacts on the Kola Peninsula. In C. Hasselblatt, P. Houtzagers, & R. van Pareren (Eds.), Language contact in times of globalization (pp. 5–26). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2003). On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 27(3), 529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igushev, E. (1976). K voprosu o kul’turnyx svjazjax komi i nencev [Towards the issue of cultural connections between Komi and Nenets]. In L. N. Žerebcov (Ed.), Еtnografija i fol’klor Komi [Ethnography and folklore of Komi] (pp. 116–118). Syktyvkar: Institute of Language, Literature and History of the Komi Scientific Centre UrB RAS.Google Scholar
Kalanova, N. (2018). Mestoimenija s semantikoj svobodnogo vybora v gornomarijskom jazyke [Free choice indefinite pronouns in Hill Mari]. In D. Mischenko (Ed.), XV Conference on typology and grammar for young scholars. Book of abstracts (St. Petersburg, 22–24 November 2018) (pp. 58–61). St. Petersburg: ILS RAS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaškin, E. (2016). Glagoly pozicii i ix perexodnye sootvetstvija v ižemskom dialekte komi-zyrjanskogo jazyka [Posture verbs and their transitive counterparts in Izhma Komi]. Rodnoj Jazyk, 4(1), 54–76.Google Scholar
Kolegova, N. (1959). Materialy dialektologičeskoj èkspedicii v Jamalo-Neneckij nacionalʹnyj okrug (ss. Muži i Šuryškary) [Materials of a dialectological field trip to the Yamal-Nenets national district] (Part 1). Archive of Komi Scientific Centre UrB RAS. Fund 1. List 11. Vol. 193.Google Scholar
Koškareva, N. (2013). Otraženie kak vid podčinitel’noj svjazi v jazykax s veršinnym markirovaniem (na materiale xantyjskogo i neneckogo jazykov) [“Reflection” as a type of subordination in head-marking languages (evidence from Khanty and Nenets)]. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series “Linguistics and Cross-cultural Communication”, 11(2), 27–41.Google Scholar
Koškareva, N., Kaškin, E., Korjakov, J., Kazakevič, O., Burkova, S., Muravʹёv, N., & Budjanskaja, E. (2017). Dialektologičeskij atlas uralʹskix jazykov, rasprostranennyx na territorii Jamalo-Neneckogo avtonomnogo okruga [Dialectological atlas of the Uralic languages spoken in the Yamal-Nenets autonomous district]. Kaliningrad: ROST-DOAFK.Google Scholar
Kosterkina, A., Momde, A., & Ždanova, T. (2001). Slovar’ nganasansko-russkij i russko-nganasanskij [Nganasan-Russian and Russian-Nganasan dictionary]. St. Petersburg: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, A. (2010). Karnaval životnyx i problemy retrognostiki (na materiale ural’skix jazykov) [Carnival of animals and problems of retrognostics (evidence from Uralic)]. In A. Kretov (Ed.), Problemy komp’juternoj lingvistiki [Issues in computational linguistics] (pp. 126–133). Voronezh: Voronezh State University.Google Scholar
Leinonen, M. (2006). The Russification of Komi. In J. Nuorluoto (Ed.), The slavicization of the Russian North. Mechanisms and chronology (pp. 204–235). Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Russian influence on the Ižma Komi dialect. International journal of bilingualism, 3(13), 309–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lytkin, V. (Ed.). (1961). Komi-russkij slovarʹ [Komi-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: State Publishing house of foreign and national dictionaries.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2013). Syllable structure. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved on 16 February, 2018 from [URL]
Matras, Y. (2007). The borrowability of structural categories. In Y. Matras, & J. Sakel (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 31–73). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., & Sakel, J. (2007). Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language, 31(4), 829–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mixalʹčenko, V. (ed.). (2016). Jazyk i obščestvo. Ènciklopedija [Language and society. Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Nekrasova, G. (2003). Sistema L-ovyx padežej v permskix jazykax: proisxoždenie i semantika [System of l-cases in the Permic languages: Origin and semantics]. Syktyvkar: Komi Scientific Centre of the Uralic Branch of RAS.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. (1999). Ostyak. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Palmer, B. (2015). Topography in language: Absolute frame of reference and the topographic correspondence hypothesis. In R. de Busser & J. R. LaPolla (Eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors (pp. 177–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleshak, P. (2018). Adnominal possessive constructions in Mordvin, Mari and Permic. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 1, 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Povod, N. (2006). Komi Severnogo Zauralʹja (XIX – pervaja četvertʹ XX v.) [Komi of the Northern trans-Ural region (19th – 1st quarter of 20th centuries)]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Privoznov, D. (2010). Posessivnye imennye gruppy v teginskom govore xantyjskogo jazyka [Possessive noun phrases in Tegi Khanty]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 6(3), 137–141.Google Scholar
Punegova, G. (2008). Fonetičeskie osobennosti funkcionirovanija russkogo jazyka v uslovijax komi-russkogo dvujazyčija v Respublike Komi (na materiale eksperimental’no-fonetičeskogo issledovanija soglasnyx) [Phonetic peculiarities in the use of Russian under conditions of Komi-Russian bilingualism in Komi Republic (evidence from the experimental study of consonants)]. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkar State University.Google Scholar
Raxilina, E. (2008). Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyx imen: Semantika i sočetaemost’ [Cognitive analysis of object names: Semantics and combinability]. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Raxilina, E., Reznikova, T., & Orexov, B. (2015). I xrjukotali zeljuki: Predvaritelʹnye zamečanija o glagolax zvukov životnyx i ix semantike [ I xrjukotali zeljuki: Preliminary remarks on verbs referring to animal sounds and their semantics]. In T. Reznikova, A. Vyrenkova, B. Orexov, & D. Ryžova (Eds.), Glagoly zvukov životnyx: Tipologija metafor [Verbs of animal sounds: Typology of metaphors] (pp. 9–33). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kulʹtury.Google Scholar
Saxarova, M., & Selʹkov, N. (1976). Ižemskij dialekt komi jazyka [The Izhma dialect of Komi]. Syktyvkar: Komi publishing house.Google Scholar
Salminen, T. (1998). Nenets. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The Uralic languages (pp. 516–547). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smetanin, A. (Ed.). (2004). Istorija Komi s drevnejšix vremen do konca XX veka [History of Komi Republic from ancient times till the end of the 20th century]. Syktyvkar: Komi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sorokina, I., & Bolina, D. (2009). Еnecko-russkij slovarʹ [Enets-Russian dictionary]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sorvačeva, V. (1959). Materialy dialektologičeskoj èkspedicii v Jamalo-Neneckij avtonomnyj okrug (g. Salexard, st. Labytnangi i pos. Aksarka) [Materials of a dialectological field trip to the Yamal-Nenets national district (Salekhard, Labytnangi, Aksarka)]. Archive of Komi Scientific Centre UrB RAS. Fund 1. List 11. Vol. 101.Google Scholar
(1960). Neneckie i xantyjskie zaimstvovanija v govore zauralʹskix komi [Nenets and Khanty borrowings in the subdialect of the trans-Ural Komi]. In Istoriko-filologičeskij sbornik [Historical and philological article collection] (pp. 171–177). Syktyvkar: Komi Publishing House.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1961). Sravnitelʹnyj slovarʹ komi-zyrjanskix dialektov [Comparative dictionary of Komi-Zyrian dialects]. Syktyvkar: Komi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sorvačeva, V., Saxarova, M., & Guljaev, E. (1966). Verxnevyčegodskij dialekt komi jazyka [The Upper Vychegda dialect of Komi]. Syktyvkar: Komi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Tereščenko, N. (1965). Nenecko-russkij slovarʹ [Nenets-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. (2001). Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Turkin, A. (1985). Komi-neneckie jazykovye kontakty [Komi-Nenets language contacts]. Soveckoe finno-ugrovedenie, 21(3), 190–203.Google Scholar
Van Alsenoy, L., & van der Auwera, J. (2015). Indefinite pronouns in Uralic languages. In M. Miestamo, A. Tamm, & B. Wagner-Nagy (Eds.), Negation in Uralic languages (p. 519–546). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vserossijskaja perepisʹ naselenija 2010 [2010 all-Russian population census]. Retrieved on 4 November, 2019 from [URL]
Xauzenberg, A. R. (1972). Nazvanija životnyx v komi jazyke (sravnitelʹno-istoričeskij analiz) [Terms for animals in Komi (comparative-historical analysis)]. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Zalizniak, A., Bulakh, M., Ganenkov, D., Gruntov, I., Maisak, T., & Russo, M. (2012). The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. Linguistics, 50(3), 633–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žerebcov, L. (1982). Istoriko-kulʹturnye vzaimootnošenija komi s sosednimi narodami [Historical and cultural relations of Komi with neighbouring peoples]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Žilina, T. (1959). Materialy dialektologičeskoj èkspedicii v Jamalo-Neneckij nacionalʹnyj okrug [Materials of a dialectological field trip to the Yamal-Nenets national district]. Part 2. Archive of Komi Scientific Centre UrB RAS. Fund 1. List 11. Vol. 192.Google Scholar
(1975). Verxnesysolʹskij dialekt komi jazyka [The Upper Sysola dialect of Komi]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
(1985). Luzsko-letskij dialekt komi jazyka [The Luza-Letka dialect of Komi]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Žilina, T., & Kolegova, N. (1960). Nekotorye osobennosti govora obskix komi (ss. Muži i Šuryškary) [Some features of the Ob Komi subdialect (villages of Muzhi and Shuryshkary)]. In Istoriko-filologičeskij sbornik [Historical and philological collection of articles] (Vol. 6, pp. 152–170). Syktyvkar: Komi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forker, Diana & Lenore A. Grenoble
2021. Some structural similarities in the outcomes of language contact with Russian. In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.