Article published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 20:1 (2018) ► pp. 102131
References

References

Antia, S. D. & Kreimeyer, K. H.
(2001) The role of interpreters in inclusive classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf 146 (4), 355–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bagga-Gupta, S.
(2004) Visually oriented language use: Discursive and technological resources in Swedish deaf pedagogical arenas. In M. V. Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf communities. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press, 171–207.Google Scholar
Berge, S. S.
(2012) Deaf pupils’ access in interpreted, peer group dialogues. Paper presented at Marginalization processes: International multidisciplinaryworkshop, Ørebro, 26–28 April 2012.
[ p. 123 ]
Berge, S. S. & Kermit, P. S.
(2017) Deaf students’ access to informal group-work avtivities seen in light of the educational interpreter’s role. In S. Bagga-Gupta (Ed.), Marginalization processes: Studies of participation across sites. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Berge, S. S.
(2014) To negotiate for the other’s turn to talk. Paper presented at ALAPP 4: Applied linguistics and professional practice, Geneva, 10–12 Sept 2014.
Berge, S. S. & Raanes, E.
(2013) Coordinating the chain of utterances: An analysis of communicative flow and turn-taking in an interpreted group dialogue for deaf-blind persons. Sign Language Studies, 13 (3), 350–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berge, S. S. & Thomassen, G.
(2015) Visual access in interpreter-mediated learning situations for deaf and hard-of-hearing high school students where an artifact is in use. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21 (2), 187–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berge, S. S. & Ytterhus, B.
(2015) Deaf and hearing high-school students’ expectations for the role of educational sign-language interpreter. Society, Health and Vulnerability 6, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, S. & Kvale, S.
(2015) Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C.
(1981) Who’s got the floor? Language in Society 10 (3), 383–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
(1991) Lærebok i tegnsprogs gramatik (Textbook in sign-language grammar). Copenhagen: Døves Center for Total Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1980) Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Inquiry 50 (3–4), 272–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62 (1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3), 606–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18 (1), 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H.
(2004) Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 222–243.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. L.
(2005) Kommunikative praksiser i visuelt orienterte klasserom (Communicative practises in visually oriented classrooms). PhD Dissertation, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Harrington, F. J.
(2000) Sign language interpreters and access for deaf students to university curricula: The ideal and the reality. In R. P. Roberts, S. E. Carr, D. Abraham & A. Dufour (Eds.), The Critical Link 2: Interpreters in the community. Selected papers from the Second International Conference on Interpreting in Legal,, Health and Social Service Settings, Vancouver, Canada, 19–23 May 1998. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 124 ]
(2005) A study of the complex nature of interpreting with deaf students in higher education. In M. Metzger & E. Fleetwood (Eds.), Attitudes, innuendo and regulators: Challenges of interpretation. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 162–187.Google Scholar
Heath, C. & Hindmarsh, J.
(2002) Analysing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In M. Tim (Ed.), Qualitative research in action. London: Sage Publications, 99–121.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. & Luff, P.
(2010) Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herreweghe, M. V.
(2002) Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling and contact in signed languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 73–103.Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2009) Language’s matrix. Gesture 9 (3), 355–372.Google Scholar
Linell, P.
(1997) Interpreting as communication. In Y. Gambier, D. Gile & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference interpreting: Current trends in research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, P. & Lee, R. G.
(2013) Getting to the core of role: Defining interpreters’ role-space. International Journal of Interpreter Education 5 (2), 54–72.Google Scholar
Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C. & Seewagen, R.
(2005) Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10 (1), 38–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, P.
(1995) Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. In P. T. Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington DC: University Press of America, 129–150.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.
(1999) Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Interpreted discourse: Learning and recognizing what interpreters do in interaction. In C. B. Roy (Ed.), Advances in teaching sign language interpreters. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, M. & Fleetwood, E.
(2004) Educational interpreting: Developing standards of practice. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 171–177.Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2009) Emergent focused interaction in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10), 1977–1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthaler, L.
(1988) A study of group process: Who’s got what floor? Journal of Pragmatics 14 (4), 537–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napier, J.
(2002) Sign language interpreting: Linguistic coping strategies. Coleford: McLean.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. -L.
(2016) Embodying metaphors: Signed language interpreters at work. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (1), 35–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roy, C. B.
(2000) Interpreting as a discourse process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In P. Cobey (Ed.), Communication theories. London: Routledge, 262–308.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S.
(2007) The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk 27 (5/6), 567–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 125 ]
(2010) Reconfiguring self/identity/status/role: The case of professional role performance in healthcare encounters. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7 (1), 75–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Role hybridity in professional practice. In S. Sarangi, V. Polese & G. Caliendo (Eds.), Genre(s) on the move: Hybridisation and discourse change in specialised communication. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 271–296.Google Scholar
Schick, B.
(2004) How might learning through an educational interpreter influence cognitive development? In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press, 73–88.Google Scholar
Solow, S. N.
(1981) Sign language interpreting: A basic resource book. Silver Spring, MD: The National Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C. & LeBaron, C.
(2011) Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (Ed.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, G. & Turner, G. H.
(1997/2002) The code and the culture: Sign language interpreting - in search of the new breed’s ethics. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 373–383.Google Scholar
Thoutenhoofd, E.
(2005) The sign language interpreter in inclusive education: Power of authority and limits of objectivism. The Translator 11 (2), 237–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wadensjö, C.
(1993) The double role of a dialogue interpreter. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 1 (1), 105–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Interpreting as interaction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Warnicke, C. & Plejert, C.
(2012) Turn-organisation in mediated phone interaction using Video Relay Service (VRS). Journal of Pragmatics 44 (10), 1313–1334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V.
(1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, E. A.
(2004) Interpretability and accessibility of mainstream classrooms. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 132–167.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Adami, Elisabetta & Ruth Swanwick
2019. Signs of understanding and turns-as-actions: a multimodal analysis of deaf–hearing interaction. Visual Communication  pp. 147035721985477 ff. Crossref logo
Pöchhacker, Franz
2020.  In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149],  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Stone, Christopher & Jeremy L. Brunson
2019.  In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Education,  pp. 367 ff. Crossref logo
Young, Alys, Jemina Napier & Rosemary Oram
2019. The translated deaf self, ontological (in)security and deaf culture. The Translator 25:4  pp. 349 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.