Article published In:
Vol. 20:2 (2018) ► pp.285308


Ahlgren, I.
(1990) Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish sign language. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Chicago/ London: University of Chicago Press, 167–174.Google Scholar
Ahlgren, I. & Bergman, B.
(2006) Det svenska teckenspråket. In SOU 2006:291, Teckenspråk och teckenspråkiga: kunskap och forskningsöversikt: delbetänkande, 11–70.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, C. & Cokely, D.
(1991) American Sign Language: A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Välkommen till [URL] (accessed 25 April 2016).
Drew, P. & Heritage, J.
(1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 97–121.Google Scholar
(2003) Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 217–242.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J.
(1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191, 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haualand, H. M.
(2012) Interpreting ideals and relaying rights. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1997) Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage, 161–182.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. & Clayman, S.
(2010) Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, E.
(1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3), 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, E., Edwards, T. & Mirus, G.
(2008) Cybersign and new proximities: Impacts of new communication technologies on space and language. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (6), 1067–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, E. & Mirus, G.
(2003) American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between Deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Language in Society 32 (5), 693–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(1967) Some functions of gaze-directions in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 261, 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1970) Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica 321, 100–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. & Klima, E. S.
(1990) Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 191–210.Google Scholar
(2010) Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations. In S. -K. Tanskanen, M. -L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Samtalskulturer kommunikativa verksamhetstyper i samhället. (Cultures of talking: Communicative activity types in society). Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.Google Scholar
Marks, A.
(2015) Investigating footing shifts in video relay service interpreted interaction. In B. Nicodemus & K. Cagle (Eds.), Signed language interpretation and translation research: Selected papers from the first international symposium. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 71–96.Google Scholar
Mason, I.
(2012) Gaze, positioning and identity in interpreted-mediated dialogues. In C. Baraldi & L. Gavioli (Eds.), Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M.
(1999) Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. -L.
(2007) The non-dominant hand in a Swedish sign language discourse. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J.
(2000) Bringing affective expression into the service of language: Acquiring perspective marking in narratives. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 355–370.Google Scholar
Roy, C. B.
(2002) The problem with definitions, descriptions, and the role metaphors of interpreters. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 344–353.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23 (3), 499–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T.
(2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Svensk författningssamling
(2003) Lag (2003:460) om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor. [URL] (accessed 22 December 2016).
Swedish Sign Language Lexicon
(2016) Svenskt Teckenspråkslexikon. [URL] (accessed 25 April 2016).
Wadensjö, C.
(1993) The double role of a dialogue interpreter. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 1 (1), 105–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1999) Telephone interpreting and the synchronization of talk. The Translator 5 (2), 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) In and off the show: Co-constructing ‘invisibility’ in an interpreter-mediated talk show interview. Meta 53 (1), 184–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warnicke, C. & Plejert, C.
(2012) Turn-organisation in mediated phone interaction using Video Relay Service (VRS). Journal of Pragmatics 44 (10), 1313–1334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Dalle-Nazebi, Sophie, Isabelle Gonzalez, François Lefebvre-Albaret & Jean-Dominique Journet
2022. Relais téléphonique, aphasie et médiation communicationnelle. Un encastrement d’innovations. Aequitas: Revue de développement humain, handicap et changement social 28:2  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Defrancq, Bart
2023. Chapter 12. Technology in interpreter education and training. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37],  pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Warnicke, Camilla
2021. Signed and spoken interaction at a distance. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 23:2  pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Warnicke, Camilla & Charlotta Plejert
2021. The use of the text-function in Video Relay Service calls. Text & Talk 41:3  pp. 391 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.