Article published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 21:2 (2019) ► pp. 165195
References

References

Babcock, L. & Vallesi, A.
(2017) Are simultaneous interpreters expert bilinguals, unique bilinguals, or both? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20 (2), 403–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bajo, M. T., Padilla, F. & Padilla, P.
(2000) Comprehension processing in simultaneous interpreting. In Y. Gambier, N. G. San Salvador & A. Chesterman (Eds.), Translation in context: Selected contributions from the EST congress, Granada, 1998. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V. & Rothstein, H. R.
(2017) Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods 8 (1), 5–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chincotta, D. & Underwood, G.
(1998) Simultaneous interpreters and the effect of concurrent articulation on immediate memory: A bilingual digit span study. Interpreting 3 (1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, I. K.
(2006) Listening while talking: The retention of prose under articulatory suppression in relation to simultaneous interpreting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (2), 206–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 186 ]
Christoffels, I. K. & de Groot, A. M. B.
(2009) Simultaneous interpreting: A cognitive perspective. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 454–479.Google Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F.
(2006) Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (3), 324–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., de Groot, A. M. B. & Waldorp, L. J.
(2003) Basic skills in a complex task: A graphical model relating lexical retrieval, working memory, and simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6 (3), 201–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G.
(1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10 (1), 101–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, S. E.
(2010) Dual role interpreters: Spanish teachers in new Latino communities. Hispania 93 (3), 490–503.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W.
(2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (5), 769–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4), 450–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M.
(1996) Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 (4), 422–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darò, V.
(1989) The role of memory and attention in simultaneous interpretation: A neurolinguistics approach. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 2, 50–56.Google Scholar
Diriker, E.
(2015) Simultaneous interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. New York: Routledge, 382–385.Google Scholar
Dong, Y. & Cai, R.
(2015) Working memory and interpreting: A commentary on theoretical models. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 63–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duis, S. S., Dean, R. S. & Derks, P.
(1994) The modality effect: A result of methodology? International Journal of Neuroscience 78 (1–2), 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duval, S. J. & Tweedie, R. L.
(2000a) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56 (2), 455–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (449), 89–98.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E. & Conway, A. R.
(1999) Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (3), 309–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, A.
(2014) The interpreter advantage hypothesis: Preliminary data patterns and empirically motivated questions. Translation and Interpreting Studies 9 (2), 219–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 187 ]
Gile, D.
(2015) The contributions of cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics to conference interpreting: A critical analysis. In A. Ferreira & J. W. Schwieter (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 41–64.Google Scholar
(2016) Experimental research. In C. Angelelli & B. J. Baer (Eds.), Researching translation and interpreting. New York: Routledge, 220–228.Google Scholar
Glass, G.
(1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5 (10), 3–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. & Lumley, T.
(2017)  forestplot: Advanced forest plot using ‘grid’ graphics. R package version 1.7.Google Scholar
Gregoire, J. & van der Linden, M.
(1997) Effect of age on forward and backward digit spans. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 4 (2), 140–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, R. J., & Thompson, S. G.
(1998) Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 17 (8), 841–856. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V.
(1981) Distribution theory for Glass’ estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics 6 (2), 107–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I.
(1980) Vote counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 88 (2), 359–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V. & Pigott, T. D.
(2001) The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 6 (3), 203–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J. P. & Thompson, S. G.
(2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 21, 1539–1558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, S., Pääkkönen, R., Vik, G.-V. & Krause, C. M.
(2016) On interpreters’ working memory and executive control. International Journal of Bilingualism 20 (3), 297–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L.
(1990) Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Formoso, J. & Jaichenco, V.
(2015) Expertise, working memory and articulatory suppression effect: Their relation with simultaneous interpreting performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 11 (2), 56–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, R.
(2010) Are all professionals experts? Definitions of expertise and reinterpretation of research evidence in process studies. In E. Angelone & G. Shreve (Eds.), Translation and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 213–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. & Nespoulous, J.-L.
(2006) Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters. Interpreting 8 (1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. & Signorelli, T. M.
(2012) Methodological aspects of working memory assessment in simultaneous interpreters. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (2), 183–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D.
(2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 188 ]
Lee, M.
(2011) Working memory performance of expert and novice interpreters. Journal of Universal Language 12 (1), 95–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J. & Moher, D.
(2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339: b2700. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Schallert, D. L. & Carroll, P. J.
(2004) Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting 6 (1), 19–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, B. N. & Conway, A. R. A.
(2014) Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21 (2), 520–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Working memory capacity as a predictor of simultaneous language interpreting performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5 (4), 434–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Moore, A. B., Kegl, J. A. & Conway, A. R. A.
(2011) Domain-general cognitive abilities and simultaneous interpreting skill. Interpreting 13 (1), 121–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melan, C., Galy, E. & Cariou, M.
(2007) Mnemonic processing in air traffic controllers (ATCs): Effects of task parameters and work organization. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 17 (4), 391–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M. & Hulme, C.
(2013) Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology 49 (2), 270–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S. & Hulme, C.
(2016) Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (4), 512–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, C. D. & Hanson, T. A.
(2017) Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & The PRISMA Group
(2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6 (7), 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morales, J., Padilla, F., Gómez-Ariza, C. J. & Bajo, M. T.
(2015) Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica 155, 82–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moser-Mercer, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., Casado, B. & Künzli, A.
(2000) Searching to define expertise in interpreting. In K. Hyltenstam & B. Englund Dimitrova (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 107–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, P., Bajo, M. T., Cañas, J. J. & Padilla, F.
(1995) Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation. In J. Tommola (Ed.), Topics in interpreting research. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, 61–71.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. S.
(2005) The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59 (2), 464–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 189 ]
Rosenthal, R.
(1979) The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86 (3), 638–641. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothe-Neves, R.
(2003) The influence of working memory features on some formal aspects of translation performance. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process-oriented research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setton, R. & Dawrant, A.
(2016) Conference interpreting – A complete course and trainer’s guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seeber, K. G.
(2011) Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories – new models. Interpreting 13 (2), 176–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Measures and methods. Target 25 (1), 18–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seleskovitch, D.
(1968/1978) Interpreting for international conferences. Problems of language and communication. Washington: Pen and Booth.Google Scholar
Signorelli, T. M., Haarmann, H. J. & Obler, L. K.
(2012) Working memory in simultaneous interpreters: Effects of task and age. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (2), 198–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Megari, K., Kosmidis, M. H., Apostolidou, M. & Takou, E.
(2012) Working memory and verbal fluency in simultaneous interpreters. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 34 (6), 624–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, J. A. C. & Harbord, R. M.
(2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal 4, 127–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. G. & Pocock, S. J.
(1991) Can meta-analysis be trusted? The Lancet 338 (8775), 1127–1130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timarová, Š.
(2008) Working memory and simultaneous interpreting. In P. Boulogne (Ed.), Translation and its others: Selected papers of the CETRA research seminar in translation studies 2007. http://​www​.arts​.kuleuven​.be​/cetra​/papers
(2015) Working memory. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. New York: Routledge, 443–446.Google Scholar
Timarová, Š. & Salaets, H.
(2011) Learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility in interpreter training: Self-selection and aptitude. Interpreting 13 (1), 31–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timarová, Š. et al.
(2014) Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control. Interpreting 16 (2), 139–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timarová, Š., Čeňková, I., Meylaerts, R., Hertog, E., Szmalec, A. & Duyck, W.
(2015) Simultaneous interpreting and working memory capacity. In A. Ferreira & J. W. Schwieter (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101–126.Google Scholar
Tzou, Y.-Z., Eslami, Z. R., Chen, H.-C. & Vaid, J.
(2012) Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance: Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (2), 213–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Noort, M. W. M. L., Bosch, P. & Hugdahl, K.
(2006) Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist 11 (4), 289–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 190 ]
Van Dijk, R., Christoffels, I. K., Postma, A. & Hermans, D.
(2012) The relation between the working memory skills of sign language interpreters and the quality of their interpretations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (2), 340–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vevea, J. L. & Woods, C. M.
(2005) Publication bias in research synthesis: Sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Psychological Methods 10 (4), 428–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viechtbauer, W.
(2005) Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 30 (3), 261–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36 (3), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viechtbauer, W. & Cheung, M. W.-L.
(2010) Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods 1 (2), 112–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Hippel, P. T.
(2015) The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology 15, 35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. & Napier, J.
(2013) Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 18 (2), 271–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Measuring bilingual working memory capacity of professional Auslan/English interpreters: A comparison of two scoring methods. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 19, 45–62.Google Scholar
Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J. & Aberdeen, J. S.
(1988) Does the capacity of working memory change with age? Experimental Aging Research 14 (2–3), 103–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woumans, E., Ceuleers, E., Van der Linden, L., Szmalec, A. & Duyck, W.
(2015) Verbal and nonverbal cognitive control in bilinguals and interpreters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41 (5), 1579–1586.Google Scholar
Wright, H. H.
(2016) Cognition, language, and aging. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Yang, S., Ceci, S. J. & Wang, Q.
(2005) Effects of bilinguals’ controlled-attention on working memory and recognition. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstand, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISB4 proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 2401–2404.Google Scholar
Yudes, C., Macizo, P. & Bajo, T.
(2012) Coordinating comprehension and production in simultaneous interpreters: Evidence from the articulatory suppression effect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (2), 329–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yudes, C., Macizo, P., Morales, L. & Bajo, M. T.
(2013) Comprehension and error monitoring in simultaneous interpreters. Applied Psycholinguistics 34 (5), 1039–1057. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020.  In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Díaz-Galaz, Stephanie
2020. Listening and comprehension in interpreting. Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:2  pp. 304 ff. Crossref logo
Goodman-Delahunty, Jane, Natalie Martschuk, Sandra B. Hale & Susan E. Brandon
2020.  In Advances in Psychology and Law [Advances in Psychology and Law, 5],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Ho, Chen-En
2021. What does professional experience have to offer?. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 4:1  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2020. Meta-analysis and replication in interpreting studies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:1  pp. 140 ff. Crossref logo
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys & Helene Stengers
2020. Adaptive control in interpreters: Assessing the impact of training and experience on working memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:4  pp. 772 ff. Crossref logo
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys, Evy Woumans, Ily Hollebeke & Hélène Stengers
2020. An interpreter advantage in executive functions?. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:2  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Parshutina, G. A.
2020. Teaching consecutive interpretation as a way to develop professional competences of future specialists in international affairs. Professional Discourse & Communication 2:2  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Valdeón, Roberto A.
2021. Perspectives on interpreting. Perspectives 29:4  pp. 441 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Hongming & Yanping Dong
2020. The early presence and developmental trend of interpreter advantages incognitive flexibility. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3:2  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Zhong, Fei, Yanping Dong & Yaqiong Liu
2021. Neural correlates of contributions of interpreting training to second language semantic integration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology  pp. 174702182110418 ff. Crossref logo
胡, 敏霞
2020. The Impact of Cognitive Control on the Interpreting Proficiency of Trainee Interpreters. Modern Linguistics 08:05  pp. 647 ff. Crossref logo
胡, 敏霞
2021. The Two-Way Relationship between Interpreting Experience and Working Memory—A Review of Empirical Evidence. Modern Linguistics 09:01  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.