Article published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 22:2 (2020) ► pp. 288308
References

References

Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M. & Yuhnke, B.
(2016) NMC/CoSN Horizon report: 2016 K-12 edition. http://​cdn​.nmc​.org​/media​/2016​-nmc​-cosn​-horizon​-report​-k12​-EN​.pdf (accessed 18 June 2019).
Alvarez, V., Bower, M., de Freitas, S., Gregory, S. & de Wit, B.
(2016) The use of wearable technologies in Australian universities: Examples from environmental science, cognitive and brain sciences and teacher training. In L. E. Dyson, W. Ng & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Mobile learning futures – sustaining quality research and practice in mobile learning. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (Sydney, Australia, October 24–26, 2016). Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney, 25–32.Google Scholar
Berber-Irabien, D.
(2010) Information and communications technologies in conference interpreting. PhD dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili. http://​www​.tesisenred​.net​/bitstream​/handle​/10803​/8775​/tesi​.pdf​?sequence​=1 (accessed 20 April 2018).
Borthwick, A. C., Anderson, C. L., Finsness, E. S. & Foulger, T. S.
(2015) Personal wearable technologies in education: value or villain? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 31 (3), 85–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bower, M.
(2008) Affordance analysis matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International 45 (1), 3–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bower, M. & Sturman, D.
(2015) What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers and Education 88, 343–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branch, R. M.
(2009) Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, S. & Slater, C.
(2014) Populating a 3D virtual learning environment for interpreting students with bilingual dialogues to support situated learning in an institutional context. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (3), 469–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, S., Slater, C., Gittins, R., Ritsos, P. D. & Roberts, J. C.
(2013) Interpreting in virtual reality: Designing and developing a 3D virtual world to prepare interpreters and their clients for professional practice. In D. Kiraly, S. Hansen-Schirra & K. Maksymski (Eds.), New prospects and perspectives for educating language mediators. Tübingen: Narr, 93–120.Google Scholar
Bulut, A. & Kurultay, T.
(2001) Interpreters-in-aid at disasters: Community interpreting in the process of disaster management. The Translator 7 (2), 249–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W.
(2005) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
(2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
D’Hayer, D.
(2012) Public service interpreting and translation: Moving towards a (virtual) community of practice. Meta 57 (1), 235–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engen, B. K., Giæver, T. H. & Mifsud, L.
(2017) Teaching and learning with wearable technologies. In J. Dron & S. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vancouver, Canada, October 17, 2017). Vancouver, BC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1057–1067. https://​www​.learntechlib​.org​/p​/181429 (accessed 18 June 2019)
Eser, O., Saltan, F., Solak, E. & Erdem, G.
(2017) Developing a 3D virtual reality learning environment by using wearable technologies to train public service interpreters. In Proceedings of IAC_TLE1 2017. International Academic Conference on Teaching, Learning and E-learning (Budapest, Hungary, April 14–15, 2017). Prague: Czech Institute of Academic Education, 39.Google Scholar
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W.
(2001) Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15 (1), 7–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, S. & Tynan, B.
(2009) Introducing Jass Easterman: My ‘Second Life’ learning space. In R. J. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds.), Same places, different spaces: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ASCILITE Conference (Auckland, New Zealand, December 6–9, 2009). Auckland: University of Auckland, 377–386. http://​www​.ascilite​.org​.au​/conferences​/auckland09​/procs​/gregory​.pdf (accessed 20 April 2018).
Hanna, M. G., Ahmed, I., Nine, J., Prajapati, S. & Pantanowitz, L.
(2018) Augmented reality technology using Microsoft HoloLens in anatomic pathology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 142 (5), 638–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, I. G. & Shlesinger, M.
(2007) The silver lining: Technology and self-study in the interpreting classroom. Interpreting 9 (1), 95–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
IVY
n.d.). IVY: Interpreting in Virtual Reality. http://​virtual​-interpreting​.net​/ivy (accessed 02 July 2018).
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. & Ludgate, H.
(2013) NMC Horizon report: 2013 higher education edition. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K. & Beers, P. J.
(2004) Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 (3), 47–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mladenović, S., Kuvač, H. & Štula, M.
(2012) Virtual learning environment. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Virtual learning environments: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moser-Mercer, B., Kherbiche, L. & Class, B.
(2014) Interpreting conflict: Training challenges in humanitarian field interpreting. Journal of Human Rights Practice 6 (1), 140–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moustakas, C.
(1994) Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulayim, S. & Lai, M.
(2015) The community-of-inquiry framework in online interpreter training. In S. Ehrlich and J. Napier (Eds.), Interpreter education in the digital age: Innovation, access, and change. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 95–124.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A.
(1988) The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q.
(2015) Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sandrelli, A. & de Manuel Jerez, J.
(2007) The impact of information and communication technology on interpreter training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1 (2), 269–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandrelli, A.
(2015) Becoming an interpreter: The role of computer technology. MonTI Special Issue 2, 111–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, M.
(2013) Virtual worlds in interpreter training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 7 (1), 91–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savin-Baden, M.
(2011) A practical guide to using Second Life in higher education. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Statista
(2019) Projected size of the augmented and virtual reality market 2016–2023. https://​www​.statista​.com​/statistics​/591181​/global​-augmented​-virtual​-reality​-market​-size (accessed 28 April 2019).
Thackray, L., Good, J. & Howland, K.
(2010) Learning and teaching in virtual worlds: Boundaries, challenges and opportunities. In A. Peachey, J. Gillen, D. Livingstone & S. Smith-Robbins (Eds.), Researching learning in virtual worlds. London: Springer, 139–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trahan, M. P., Adams, N. B. & Dupre, S.
(2011) Virtual learning environments: Second Life MUVEs to leverage student ownership. In G. Vincenti & J. Braman (Eds.), Multi-user virtual environments for the classroom: Practical approaches to teaching in virtual worlds. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 62–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tymczyńska, M.
(2009) Integrating in-class and online learning activities in a healthcare interpreting course using Moodle. JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 12, 148–164.Google Scholar
van Manen, M.
(1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Viseu, A.
(2003) Simulation and augmentation: Issues of wearable computers. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (1), 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(1979) Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, T., Dameff, C. & Tully, J.
(2014) Integrating Google Glass into simulation-based training: Experiences and future directions. Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing 4 (2), 49–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H.
(2008) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7. bs). Ankara: Seçkin.Google Scholar