Cover not available
Article published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 22:2 (2020) ► pp.163–186

An interpreter advantage in executive functions?

A systematic review

 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel | Leiden University
 | Ghent University
 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
The aim of this systematic literature review was to answer the question of which executive function is most affected by interpreter training and experience. We used the ‘unity and diversity’ framework of executive functions to distinguish between three executive components: Response and Distractor Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating. Among the seventeen studies included in the review, we only found evidence for an interpreter advantage on Shifting and Updating, but with a different pattern for each of these. With regard to Updating, groups of interpreters scored better than comparison groups, but general trend in longitudinal studies did not show an improvement for interpreter trainees. In contrast, for Shifting, scores improved as a result of interpreting training. Our systematic review stresses the importance of understanding the diversity of executive processes when investigating the relationship between interpreting and cognitive performance.
Keywords: cognitive control, executive functions, bilingual advantage, working memory
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • The present study
  • Methods
    • Literature search and selection criteria
    • Classification of articles
      • Classification according to task of executive functioning
      • Selection based on statistical results
  • Results
    • Selected articles
    • Research question 1
    • Research question 2
    • Research question 3
  • Discussion
    • On which executive process do interpreters score better than a comparison group?
    • Which executive process is related to interpreting experience?
    • Which executive process shows most progress during interpreter training?
    • Integration into theory of executive functions
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00045.nou
References (66)
References
Arnett, P. A., Rao, S. M., Grafman, J., Bernardin, L., Luchetta, T., Binder, J. R. & Lobeck, L. (1997). Executive functions in multiple sclerosis: An analysis of temporal ordering, semantic encoding, and planning abilities. Neuropsychology 11 (4), 535–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. & Vallesi, A. (2015). Language control is not a one-size-fits-all languages process: Evidence from simultaneous interpretation students and the n-2 repetition cost. Frontiers in Psychology 61:1622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Are simultaneous interpreters expert bilinguals, unique bilinguals, or both? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20 (2), 403–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science 255 (5044), 556–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Gunn, D. M. & Baddeley, A. D. (2003). The complexities of complex span: Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 132 (1), 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology 391, 15–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2010). Global-local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond Inhibition. Developmental Psychology 46 (1), 93–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K. & Marian, V. (2014). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in stimulus-stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (3), 610–629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, R. D., Dong, Y. P., Zhao, N. & Lin, J. X. (2015). Factors contributing to individual differences in the development of consecutive interpreting competence for beginner student interpreters. Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9 (1), 104–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (3), 324–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Abad, F. J. & Shih, P. C. (2006). Complex span tasks, simple span tasks, and cognitive abilities: A reanalysis of key studies. Memory & Cognition 34 (1), 158–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 641, 135–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. P. & Liu, Y. H. (2016). Classes in translating and interpreting produce differential gains in switching and updating. Frontiers in Psychology 71:1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. P. & Xie, Z. L. (2014). Contributions of second language proficiency and interpreting experience to cognitive control differences among young adult bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26 (5), 506–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, B. A. & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16 (1), 143–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A. & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (3), 340–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P. & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 133 (1), 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Altamirano, L. J., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Rhea, S. A. & Hewitt, J. K. (2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology 52 (2), 326–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A. M. (2014). The interpreter advantage hypothesis: Preliminary data patterns and empirically motivated questions. Translation and Interpreting Studies 9 (2), 219–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research 18 (10), 1279–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., Greene, M. R., Vaughn, K. A., Francis, D. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015). Beyond the bilingual advantage: The potential role of genes and environment on the development of cognitive control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 351, 109–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, A., Moser-Mercer, B. & Golestani, N. (2015). Brain functional plasticity associated with the emergence of expertise in extreme language control. Neuroimage 1141, 264–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, A., Moser-Mercer, B., Michel, C. M. & Golestani, N. (2015). fMRI of simultaneous interpretation reveals the neural basis of extreme language control. Cerebral Cortex 25 (12), 4727–4739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hitch, G. J. & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 281, 603–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Formoso, J. & Jaichenco, V. I. (2015). Expertise, working memory and articulatory suppression effect: Their relation with simultaneous interpreting performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 11 (2), 56–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology 891, 1–80.Google Scholar
Jonides, J. & Smith, E. E. (1997). The architecture of working memory. In M. D. Rugg (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 243–276.Google Scholar
Kazemeini, T. & Fadardi, J. S. (2016). Executive function: Comparing bilingual and monolingual Iranian university students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45 (6), 1315–1326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, I., Gade, M. & Philipp, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology 51 (1), 52–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S. & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17 (1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2006). Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters. Interpreting 8 (1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R. & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information-processing and intelligence: Some implications of task complexity. Intelligence 12 (2), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Schallert, D. L. & Carroll, P. J. (2004). Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting 6 (1), 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 189–239.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B. N. & Conway, A. R. A. (2014). Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21 (2), 520–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Working memory capacity as a predictor of simultaneous language interpreting performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5 (4), 434–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Moore, A. B., Kegl, J. A. & Conway, A. R. A. (2011). Domain-general cognitive abilities and simultaneous interpreting skill. Interpreting 13 (1), 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, C. D. & Hanson, T. A. (2019). Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory. Interpreting 21 (2), 165–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Meta-analysis and replication in interpreting studies. Interpreting 22 (1), 140–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41 (1), 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition. Hove: Erlbaum, 93–148.Google Scholar
Morales, J., Padilla, F., Gomez-Ariza, C. J. & Bajo, M. T. (2015). Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica 1551, 82–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, N. & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology 811, 111–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. B. & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science 10 (6), 719–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9 (3), 353–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipp, A. M. & Koch, I. (2009). Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (5), 1187–1195.Google Scholar
Philipp, A. M., Gade, M. & Koch, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (3), 395–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13 (2), 253–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, R. D. & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 124 (2), 207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Lalwani, L. N. & Velez-Uribe, I. (2016). The effect of language proficiency on executive functions in balanced and unbalanced Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (3), 489–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheil, J. & Kleinsorge, T. (2014). N-2 repetition costs depend on preparation in trials n-1 and n-2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (3), 865–872.Google Scholar
Signorelli, T., Haarmann, H. & Obler, L. (2011). Working memory in simultaneous interpreters: Effects of task and age. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (2), 198–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. R. & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: Effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51 (3), 300–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Megari, K., Kosmidis, M. H., Apostolidou, M. & Takou, E. (2012). Working memory and verbal fluency in simultaneous interpreters. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 34 (6), 624–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobach, T., Becker, M., Schubert, T. & Kuhn, S. (2015). Better dual-task processing in simultaneous interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 181, 643–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timarová, S., Čeňková, I., Meylaerts, R., Hertog, E., Szmalec, A. & Duyck, W. (2014). Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control. Interpreting 16 (2), 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tzou, Y. Z., Eslami, Z. R., Chen, H. C. & Vaid, J. (2012). Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance: Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (2), 213–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N. & Engle, R. W. (2006). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (1), 68–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin 133 (6), 1038–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, R., Christoffels, I., Postma, A. & Hermans, D. (2012). The relation between the working memory skills of sign language interpreters and the quality of their interpretations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (2), 340–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, H. & Dong, Y. P. (2019). How does interpreting experience enhance working memory and short-term memory? A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31 (8), 769–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woumans, E., Ceuleers, E., Van der Linden, L., Szmalec, A. & Duyck, W. (2015). Verbal and nonverbal cognitive control in bilinguals and interpreters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41 (5), 1579–1586.Google Scholar
Yntema, D. B. (1963). Keeping track of several things at once. Human Factors 5 (1), 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yudes, C., Macizo, P. & Bajo, T. (2011). The influence of expertise in simultaneous interpreting on non-verbal executive processes. Frontiers in Psychology 21:309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Elmer, Stefan & Nathalie Giroud
2023. Simultaneous interpreting, brain aging, and cognition. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 6:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Melicherčíková, Miroslava & Soňa Hodáková
2023. Prieniky a odlišnosti v kognitívno-osobnostnom profile a tlmočníckom výkone profesionálov a študentov, DOI logo
Song, Qichao, Ting Song & Xiaodong Fei
2023. Effects of executive functions on consecutive interpreting for Chinese-Japanese unbalanced bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Ghiselli, Serena
2022. Working memory tasks in interpreting studies. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 5:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Chen-En
2021. What does professional experience have to offer?. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 4:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
胡, 敏霞
2020. The Impact of Cognitive Control on the Interpreting Proficiency of Trainee Interpreters. Modern Linguistics 08:05 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
胡, 敏霞
2021. Review and Commentary on the Interactive Effects of Interpreting Experience and Executive Control. Modern Linguistics 09:02 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.