Cover not available
Article published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 23:2 (2021) ► pp.296–320

Signed and spoken interaction at a distance

Interpreter practices to strive for progressivity at the beginning of calls via the Swedish video relay service

 | Örebro University
In video relay service (VRS), the interpreter is the only person who is directly linked to both users of the service, seeing the signing user of a videophone and hearing the speaking user of a telephone. The interaction is especially challenging at the beginning of the call. In this study, 25 authentic recorded calls from the Swedish VRS were analysed using conversation analysis. The aim of the study was to explore and describe in detail how the interpreters facilitate and strive for progression at the beginning of a VRS call. The study findings show how the interpreters provide information to the signing callers about their progress prior to the call being accepted, how the interpreters manage the spoken interaction with the called party on the telephone and how the interpreters connect the parties to each other. It is also shown how the interpreters work to make the deaf callers master a call. The results of the study enrich our current understanding of calls made via VRS.
Keywords: interpreting, signed language, telephone, videophone, video relay service, VRS
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.The VRS process – A typology
  • 4.Materials and methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Information about the call progress prior to the called party answering
    • 5.2Information about the service and the interaction to the called party
    • 5.3The process of connecting the participants to each other
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00054.war
References (31)
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by MM Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, B. & Nilsson, A.-L. (1999). Teckenspråket. In K. Hyltenstam (Ed.), Sveriges sju inhemska språk: Ett minoritetsspråksperspektiv [Sweden’s seven native languages: A minority language perspective]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 329–339.Google Scholar
Brunson, J. L. (2011). Video relay service interpreters: Intricacies of sign language access. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haualand, H. & Nilsson, A. L. (2019). Working with active interpreters: A commentary about interpreting terminology and concepts. International Journal of Interpreter Education 11 (2), 40–45.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: SAGE, 161–182.Google Scholar
(2013). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marks, A. (2018). Hold the phone! Translation and Interpreting Studies 13 (1), 87–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, J. L., Reynolds, W. & Minor, R. (2012). “You want what on your PIZZA!?”: Videophone and video-relay service as potential influences on the lexical standardization of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 12 (3), 371–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. (2011). Profession in pentimento. In B. Nicodemus & L. Swabey (Eds.), Advances in interpreting research: Inquiry and action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 199–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PTS (Post-och telestyrelsen) (2015). Upphandling Bildtelefoni 150215 [Procurement Video Relay Service 150215].Google Scholar
Roy, C. B. (1989). A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter’s role in the turn exchanges of an interpreted event. Doctoral dissertation, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language in Society 501, 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Texttelefoni.se. (2019). Short information in English. <[URL]> (accessed 21 August 2020).
Wadensjö, C. (1993). The double role of a dialogue interpreter. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 1 (1), 105–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2017). Dialogue interpreting and the distribution of responsibility. Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication in Business 8 (14), 111–129.Google Scholar
Warnicke, C. (2017). Tolkning vid förmedlade samtal via Bildtelefoni.net – Interaktion och gemensamt meningsskapande [The interpreting of relayed calls through the service Bildtelefoni.net – Interaction and the joint construction of meaning]. Doctoral dissertation, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Warnicke, C. (2018a). The co-creation of communicative projects within the Swedish Video Relay Service (VRS). In J. Napier, R. Skinner & S. Braun (Eds.), Here or there: Research on interpreting via video link. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 210–229.Google Scholar
(2018b). Tolkning vid förmedlade samtal via Bildtelefoni. In H. Haualand, A.-L. Nilsson & E. Raanes (Eds.), Tolking – språkarbeid og profesjonsutøvelse [Interpreting – language work and professional practice]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk, 143–157.Google Scholar
Warnicke, C. & Plejert, C. (2012). Turn-organisation in mediated phone interaction using video relay service (VRS). Journal of Pragmatics 44 (10), 1313–1334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The headset as an interactional resource in video relay interpreting (VRI). Interpreting 20 (2), 285–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in press). The use of the text function in video relay service calls. Text and Talk.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Warnicke, Camilla & Mathias Broth
2023. Embodying dual actions as interpreting practice. Translation and Interpreting Studies 18:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.