Discussion published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 24:1 (2022) ► pp.140146
References (9)
References
Basu, R. (2021). Top 15 best plagiarism detection and remover tools in 2021. [URL] (accessed 7 October 2021).
Cui, Y. & Zhao, W. (Eds.) (2015). Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kriegeskorte, N. (2014). What lesson do rising retraction rates hold for peer review? The Conversation (9 July 2014). [URL] (accessed 18 October 2021).
Mahamud, A. A. (2021). Plagiarism checker best free tools. [URL] (accessed 7 October 2021).
Penet, J.-C. (2015). Review of Y. Cui and W. Zhao (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation (IGI Global, 2015). JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 24 1, 262–264.Google Scholar
Plagiarism.org (2017). What is plagiarism? [URL] (accessed 23 June 2021).
Pöchhacker, F. & Liu, M. (2021). Interpreting research in print: A quarter-century update. Interpreting 23 (1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Noorden, R. (2011). Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature 4781, 26–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cui, Ying & Xiao Liu
2023. A Questionnaire Survey on Chinese Translation and Interpreting Scholars’ Publication Pressure and Its Impact on Research Quality and Publishing Ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 18:3  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Bei
2022. Trust to thrive. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:2  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.