Cover not available
Article published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 24:2 (2022) ► pp.279–308

Exploring the predictive validity of an interpreting aptitude test battery

An approximate replication

| Beijing Foreign Studies University
| Beijing Foreign Studies University

This study explores the validity of a battery of interpreting aptitude tests comprising the SynCloze test, the Negative Affectivity Scale and the Inventory of Learning Styles in predicting the interpreting performance of Chinese interpreting trainees. The aptitude test battery was conducted at the beginning of the first semester for 68 post-graduate interpreting students in four Chinese interpreter training programs. English-Chinese (E-C) and Chinese-English (C-E) consecutive interpreting (CI) tests that measure the interpreting proficiency of the participants were conducted at the end of the semester. The results of the correlation and regression analysis indicated that the SynCloze test enjoyed statistically significant predictive power for both directions of CI and that its predictive power was stronger for C-E CI (β = 0.70) than for E-C CI (β = 0.48); negative affectivity was found to be a statistically significant predictor for E-C CI (β = −0.21) but not for C-E CI. Neither the meaning-directed nor the reproduction-directed learning style could predict interpreting performance. The implications of the findings are discussed in relation to interpreter selection and training.

Keywords: aptitude testing, SynCloze, negative affectivity, learning styles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
      • 3.2.1Aptitude test battery
      • 3.2.2CI tests
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Scoring aptitude tests
    • 3.5Assessment of interpreting performance
      • 3.5.1Rater selection
      • 3.5.2Rating criteria
      • 3.5.3Rater training
      • 3.5.4Inter-rater reliability
        • 3.5.4.1Inter-rater reliability of pilot scoring
        • 3.5.4.2Inter-rater reliability of actual scoring
    • 3.6Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Correlation analysis
    • 4.2Regression analysis
      • 4.2.1Regression for E-C CI
      • 4.2.2Regression for C-E CI
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Predictive power of the aptitude tests
      • 5.1.1The SynCloze test
      • 5.1.2Negative affectivity
      • 5.1.3Learning styles
    • 5.2Implications for candidate screening
    • 5.3Implications for interpreter training
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00078.liu
References
Bontempo, K. & Napier, J.
(2011) Evaluating emotional stability as a predictor of interpreter competence and aptitude for interpreting. Interpreting 13 (1), 85–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chabasse, C. & Kader, S.
(2014) Putting interpreting admissions exams to the test: The MA KD Germersheim Project. Interpreting 16 (1), 19–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Union
(2020) Marking criteria for consecutive (indicative only). [URL] (accessed 10 May 2021).
Field, A.
(2018) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Gerver, D., Longley, P., Long, J. & Lambert, S.
(1984) Selecting trainee conference interpreters: A preliminary study. Journal of Occupational Psychology 57 (1), 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, H.
(2015) Consultation on People-to-People Exchange – U.S.–China Consultation on CPE Women’s Leadership Exchange and Dialogue event. [URL] (accessed 13 October 2021).
Huang, L., Yang, T. & Ji, Z.
(2003) Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese (in Chinese). Chinese Mental Health Journal 17 (1), 54–56.Google Scholar
ILR
n.d.). ILR skill level descriptions for interpretation performance. [URL] (accessed 10 May 2021).
Longley, P.
(1989) The use of aptitude testing in the selection of students for conference interpretation training. In L. Gran & J. Dodds (Eds.), The theoretical and practical aspects of teaching conference interpretation. Udine: Campanotto, 105–108.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Moore, A. B., Kegl, J. A. & Conway, A. R.
(2011) Domain-general cognitive abilities and simultaneous interpreting skill. Interpreting 13 (1), 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. & Bridgmon, K.
(2012) Quantitative and statistical research methods: From hypothesis to results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. O. & Wong, P.
(1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1 (1), 30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NAATI
(2020) Certified conference interpreter test assessment rubrics. [URL] (accessed 10 May 2021).
Nichols, D. P.
(1998) Choosing an intraclass correlation coefficient. SPSS Keywords 67 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
Porte, G. & Richards, K.
(2012) Focus article: Replication in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing 21 1, 284–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portney, L. G. & Watkins, M. P.
(2000) Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, F.
(2011) Assessing aptitude for interpreting: The SynCloze test. Interpreting 13 (1), 106–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosiers, A., Eyckmans, J. & Bauwens, D.
(2011) A story of attitudes and aptitudes?: Investigating individual difference variables within the context of interpreting. Interpreting 13 (1), 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, D. B.
(2004) Fundamental aspects of interpreter education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setton, R. & Dawrant, A.
(2016) Conference interpreting: A trainer’s guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shang, X. & Xie, G.
(2020) Aptitude for interpreting revisited: Predictive validity of recall across languages. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 14 (3), 344–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timarová, Š. & Ungoed-Thomas, H.
(2008) Admission testing for interpreting courses. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (1), 29–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. D.
(1994) Inventory of learning styles in higher education. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. & Donche, V.
(2017) A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review 29 (2), 269–299.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, A. & Tellegen, A.
(1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6), 1063–1070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xing, X.
(2015) Research on interpreting aptitude and its testing: A case study of admission tests for MTI in China (in Chinese). Foreign Language Testing and Teaching 3 1, 9–29.Google Scholar
(2017) The effects of personality hardiness on interpreting performance: Implications for aptitude testing for interpreting. PhD dissertation, Xiamen University.
Xu, H.
(2013) Learning statistics from examples of second language research (in Chinese). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Xu, X.
(2012) Transcript of Xiaonian Xu’s Speech at the 12th Annual Conference of BOAO 21st Century Real Estate Forum (in Chinese). [URL] (accessed 13 October 2021).
Yu, H., Luo, Y., Sa, J. & Ai, Y.
(2011) Intraclass correlation coefficient and software procedures (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Health Statistics 28 (5), 497–500.Google Scholar