Review published In:
InterpretingVol. 25:2 (2023) ► pp.313–319
Book review
. Mediated discourse at the European Parliament: Empirical investigations. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2022. 276 pp. ISBN 978-3-96110-393-5
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (14)
Bartłomiejczyk, M. (2016). Face
threats in interpreting: A pragmatic study of plenary discourse in the European
Parliament. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
(2020). How
much noise can you make through an interpreter? A case study on racist discourse in the European
Parliament. Interpreting
22
(2), 238–261. 
Beaton, M. (2007). Interpreter
ideologies in institutional discourse: The case of the European Parliament. The
Translator
13
(2), 271–296.
Beaton-Thome, M. (2020). Flagging
the homeland: Interpreting Brexit à la Nigel Farage in the European
Union. In: K. Strani (Ed.), Multilingualism
and politics: Revisiting multilingual
citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 105–127.
Chmiel, A. (2016). Directionality
and context effects in word translation tasks performed by conference interpreters. Poznań
Studies in Contemporary
Linguistics
52
(2), 269–295.
Duflou, V. (2016). Be(com)ing
a conference interpreter: An ethnography of EU interpreters as a professional
community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferraresi, A., Bernardini, S., Petrović, M. M. & Lefer, M.-A. (2018). Simplified
or not simplified? The different guises of mediated English at the European
Parliament. Meta
63
(3), 717–738.
Graves, A., Pascual Olaguíbel, M. & Peason, C. (2022). Conference
interpreting in the European Union institutions. In: M. Albl-Mikasa & E. Tiselius (Eds), The
Routledge handbook of conference interpreting. London/New York: Routledge, 104–114.
Kajzer-Wietrzny, M. (2013). Idiosyncratic
features of interpreting style. New Voices in Translation
Studies
9
1, 38–52.
Kent, S. J. (2009). A
discourse of danger and loss. Interpreters on interpreting for the European
Parliament. In: L. Stern, U. Ozolins & S. B. Hale (Eds), The
Critical Link 5: Quality in interpreting: A shared
responsibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–70.
Magnifico, C. & Defrancq, B. (2016). Impoliteness
in interpreting: A question of gender? Translation &
Interpreting
8
(2), 26–45.
Monti, C., Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli, A. & Russo, M. (2005). Studying
directionality in simultaneous interpreting through an electronic corpus: EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting
Corpus). Meta
50
(4), 1079–1147.
Okoniewska, A. (2019). Simultaneous
interpretation of political discourse: Coping strategies vs discourse strategies. A case
study. In: M. C. Jullion, L. M. Clouet & I. Cennamo (Eds), Les
institutions et les médias. De l’analyse du discours á la
traduction. Milano: LED, 113–152.
Vuorikoski, A.-R. (2004). A
voice of its citizens or a modern Tower of Babel? The quality of interpreting as a function of political rhetoric in the
European Parliament. Tampere: Tampere University Press.