Article published In:
Aptitude for InterpretingEdited by Miriam Shlesinger † and Franz Pöchhacker
[Interpreting 13:1] 2011
► pp. 121–142
Edited by Miriam Shlesinger † and Franz Pöchhacker
[Interpreting 13:1] 2011
► pp. 121–142
Domain-general cognitive abilities and simultaneous interpreting skill
This exploratory study examined domain-general cognitive abilities that may serve as aptitudes for interpreting skill by comparing highly skilled sign language interpreters (those considered competent in most interpreting situations) and less skilled sign language interpreters (those considered less than competent in most interpreting situations) on various measures. Specifically, the current study examined the feasibility of predicting interpreter skill level based only on a variety of cognitive abilities and personality traits. We collected data on several cognitive measures, including processing speed, psychomotor speed, cognitive control and task switching ability, fluid intelligence, working memory capacity, and mental flexibility, as well as several personality measures, including risk-taking orientation and emotion-cognition integration style, and intrinsic motivation to engage in complex cognitive tasks. Significant differences emerged between the two groups on both cognitive and personality measures suggesting that a combination of stable domain-general cognitive abilities and personality traits may be responsible for differentiating highly skilled from less skilled interpreters and may therefore be predictive of individuals’ future interpreting effectiveness and skill level.
Keywords: interpreter, aptitudes, cognitive abilities, prediction, measurement
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Macnamara, Brooke N., Ibrahim Berber, M. Cenk Çavuşoğlu, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Naren Nallapareddy, Noelle E. Nelson, Philip J. Smith, Amy L. Wilson-Delfosse & Soumya Ray
2024. Does using artificial intelligence assistance accelerate skill decay and hinder skill development without performers’ awareness?. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 9:1 
Lu, Xinchao & Xiuling Xu
2023. Testing aptitude for simultaneous interpreting: the predictive validity of recall and lexical-syntactic flexibility test. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Melicherčíková, Miroslava & Soňa Hodáková
2023. Prieniky a odlišnosti v kognitívno-osobnostnom profile a tlmočníckom výkone profesionálov a študentov,
Song, Qichao, Ting Song & Xiaodong Fei
2023. Effects of executive functions on consecutive interpreting for Chinese-Japanese unbalanced bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Song, Shuxian & Dechao Li
2023. Aptitude for interpreting: the predictive value of cognitive fluency. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Su, Wei
2023. Investigating student interpreters’ emotional component of aptitude: a mixed method approach. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Xu, Yi
2023. Exploring individual differences in the prediction of awareness and improvement in trainee interpreters: an aptitude-treatment interaction approach. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Liu, Yubo & Wei Zhang
2022. Exploring the predictive validity of an interpreting aptitude test battery. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Liu, Yubo & Wei Zhang
2023. Discourse-based recall, language anxiety and achievement motive: revisiting interpreting aptitude testing in the Chinese context. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Melicherčíková, Miroslava
2022. Motivácia profesionálnych tlmočníkov a študentov/absolventov: podobnosti a rozdiely. Nová filologická revue 14:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Watkins, Freya, Stacey Webb, Christopher Stone & Robin L. Thompson
2022. Language aptitude in the visuospatial modality: L2 British Sign Language acquisition and cognitive skills in British Sign Language-English interpreting students. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Archana, J. V. & P. S. Sreedevi
2021. A Review on Pedagogical Methods Supporting Development of Cognitive Abilities in Preschoolers. In Neuro-Systemic Applications in Learning, ► pp. 261 ff.
Ferreira, Aline, John W. Schwieter & Julia Festman
2020. Cognitive and Neurocognitive Effects From the Unique Bilingual Experiences of Interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys, Evy Woumans, Ily Hollebeke & Hélène Stengers
2020. An interpreter advantage in executive functions?. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Herring, Rachel E.
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2019. Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 21:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys & Hélène Stengers
2019. Attention Network in Interpreters: The Role of Training and Experience. Behavioral Sciences 9:4 ► pp. 43 ff.
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff.
Adams, Krista
2017. Domain-specific activities in ASL-English interpreting and their relevance to expertise development. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Hiltunen, Sinikka & Gun-Viol Vik
2017. Interpreters – experts in careful listening and efficient encoding? Findings of a prose recall test. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Macnamara, Brooke N. & Andrew R. A. Conway
2016. Working memory capacity as a predictor of simultaneous language interpreting performance.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5:4 ► pp. 434 ff.
Wang, Jihong
2016. The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Morales, Julia, Francisca Padilla, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza & M. Teresa Bajo
2015. Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica 155 ► pp. 82 ff.
Timarová, Šárka, Ivana Čeňková & Reine Meylaerts
2015. Simultaneous interpreting and working memory capacity. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 115], ► pp. 101 ff.
Russo, Mariachiara
2014. Testing aptitude for interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, J. & J. Napier
2013. Signed Language Working Memory Capacity of Signed Language Interpreters and Deaf Signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 18:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Angelelli, Claudia V.
2012. Testing and assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 3], ► pp. 172 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.