Court interpreting and classical rhetoric
Ethos in interpreter-mediated monological discourse
This case study is based on a transcript of an authentic criminal proceeding in a Belgian Assize Court, where Dutch is the official language and the French-speaking defendant receives simultaneous whispered interpretation of the prosecutor’s closing speech. Examining six excerpts from the speech, which is addressed to the judges and the lay jury, the analysis compares the Dutch original with the French interpretation. The specific focus of the study is the Aristotelian concept of ethos, i.e. the image the speaker seeks to convey of himself by foregrounding his professional expertise, integrity and goodwill towards the audience. Since the rhetorical devices he uses for this purpose are often absent from the interpretation in the extracts analysed, the strategic persuasiveness of his speech is weakened. This means that the defendant is likely to gain an incomplete, misleading perception of his own case. In the light of the examples presented here, the authors argue that the theory of classical rhetoric affords a useful framework for exploring interpreter-mediated legal monologues in a dialogical perspective.
Published online: 30 March 2015
Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C
Felton Rosulek, L
(2014) Ethos et interprétation judiciaire. Une analyse ethnographique de l’interprétation dans une cour d’assises belge: une étude de cas. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
Gallez, E. & Maryns, K
(2002) Pragmatic meaning in court interpreting: An empirical study of additions in consecutively interpreted question-answer dialogues. PhD dissertation, The Aarhus School of Business.
Mason, I. & Stewart, M
(2006) The cultural turn in community interpreting: A brief analysis of epistemological developments in community interpreting literature in the light of paradigm changes in the humanities. In E. Hertog & B. van der Veer (Eds.), Taking stock: Research and methodology in community interpreting. Linguistica Antverpiensia 51, 21–41.
Rudvin, M. & Tomassini, E
Tulkens, F. & van de Kerchove, M
(2005–2006) Online course in relevance theory and pragmatics. University College London. Department of Phonetics and Linguistics.
Cited by 2 other publications
Defrancq, Bart & Sofie Verliefde
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.