Article published In:
InterpretingVol. 18:2 (2016) ► pp.273–284
The myth of the myth of invisibility?
References
AIIC [MK1] [International Association of Conference Interpreters]
Code of Professional Ethics. [URL] (accessed 14 November 2015).
Anderson R.B.W
(1976) Perspectives on the role of interpreter. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research. NewYork: Gardner Press, 208–228.
Angelelli, C.V
(2004a) Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
(2004b) Revisiting the interpreter’s role: A study of conference, court, and medical interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2006) Validating professional standards and codes: Challenges and opportunities. Interpreting 8 (2), 175–193.
(2012) Challenges in interpreters’ coordination of the construct of pain. In C. Baraldi & L. Gavioli (Eds.), Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251–268.
Angelelli, C.V. & Jacobson, H.E
(Eds.) (2009) Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies: A call for dialogue between research and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bancroft, M.A
(2011) The community interpreter: Professional interpreter training for bilingual staff and community interpreters (5th ed.). Columbia, MD: Culture & Language Press.
Bancroft, M.A., Garcia Beyaert, S., Allen, K., Carriero-Contreras, G. & Socarras-Estrada, D
(2015) The community interpreter: An international textbook. Columbia, MD: Culture & Language Press.
Bischoff, A., Kurth, E. & Henley, A
(2012) Staying in the middle: A qualitative study of health care interpreters’ perceptions of their work. Interpreting 14 (1), 1–22.
Bot, H
Crezee, I
CHIA [California Healthcare Interpreting Association]
Dean, R.K. & Pollard, R.Q
(2011) Context-based ethical reasoning in interpreting: A demand control schema perspective. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1), 155–182.
Duflou, V
(2012) The ‘first person norm’ in conference interpreting (CI) – some reflections on findings from the field. In M.A. Jiménez Ivars & M.J. Blasco Mayor (Eds.), Interpreting Brian Harris: Recent developments in translatology. Bern: Peter Lang, 145–160.
Frishberg, N
(1990) Introduction to interpreting (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
Gentile. A., Vasilakakos, M. & Ozolins, U
(1996) Liaison Iinterpreting: A handbook. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
NAJIT [National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators]
[n.d.] Code of ethics and professional responsibilities. [URL] (accessed 7 March 2015).
National Standard Guide for Community Interpreting Services
Shackman, J
(1984) The right to be understood: A handbook on working with, employing and training community interpreters. Cambridge: National Extension College.
Tebble, H
(2012) Interpreting or interfering? In C. Baraldi & L. Gavioli (Eds.), Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–44.
Venuti, L
(1995, 2006) The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. London: Routledge.
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Amuzu, Evershed K., Akua Campbell & Seth Ofori
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2017. The interpreter’s visibility in the European Parliament. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 159 ff. 
Boéri, Julie
Chernyshova, Elizaveta & Anna Claudia Ticca
2020. L’interprète comme « machine à traduire » et la négociation de la signification en interaction : deux pratiques en tension ?. Rhizome N° 75-76:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Downie, Jonathan
2017. Finding and critiquing the invisible interpreter – a response to Uldis Ozolins. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Downie, Jonathan
Gavioli, Laura & Cecilia Wadensjö
2021. Reflections on Doctor Question – Patient Answer Sequences and on Lay Perceptions of Close Translation. Health Communication 36:9 ► pp. 1080 ff.
Hu, Juan
2022. Qualitative Analysis on Role Deviation in Hedges Shifting. In Hedges in Chinese-English Conference Interpreting [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 89 ff.
Hu, Juan
2022. Literature Review. In Hedges in Chinese-English Conference Interpreting [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 19 ff.
Li, Ruitian, Andrew K. F. Cheung & Kanglong Liu
2022. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Extra-Textual, Connective, and Emphasizing Additions in English-Chinese Conference Interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Martínez-Gómez, Aída
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2018. Interpreter traits and the relationship with technology and visibility. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:3 ► pp. 366 ff.
Ng, Eva N.S. & Ineke H.M. Crezee
2020. Introduction. Interpreting in legal and healthcare settings. In Interpreting in Legal and Healthcare Settings [Benjamins Translation Library, 151], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pokorn, Nike K. & Tamara Mikolič Južnič
2020. Community interpreters versus intercultural mediators. Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:1 ► pp. 80 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2020. Chapter 1. “Going video”. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149], ► pp. 13 ff.
René de Cotret, François, Eva Ošlejšková, Soumya Tamouro & Yvan Leanza
2018. Donner la parole aux interprètes : le mythe de la neutralité et autres facteurs contextuels pouvant nuire à la performance. L'Autre Volume 18:3 ► pp. 282 ff.
Salaets, Heidi & Katalin Balogh
2023. Are interpreters and interpreting technology ready for the post-Covid era?. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 254 ff.
T. de V. Souza, Izabel E.
2020. The Medical Interpreter Mediation Role. In Handbook of Research on Medical Interpreting [Advances in Medical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Care, ], ► pp. 99 ff.
T. de V. Souza, Izabel E.
2022. The Medical Interpreter Mediation Role. In Research Anthology on Applied Linguistics and Language Practices, ► pp. 614 ff.
Vargas-Urpi, Mireia
2019. When non-renditions are not the exception. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:4 ► pp. 478 ff.
Xu, Han
2021. Interprofessional relations in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. An Australian case study. Perspectives 29:4 ► pp. 608 ff.
Xu, Han
2021. Roles, ethics and lawyers’ reactions: An ethnographic study of interpreters’ role performance in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. Multilingua 40:5 ► pp. 617 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.