Part of
InterpretingVol. 5:1 (2000) ► pp.49–56
Miscellaneous
Interpreter ethics
A review of the traditional and electronic literature
The following review on ethics in interpreting is published as an invitation to our readers for short contributions on a highly explosive subject in the field of interpreting. Please address all contributions to the Editors ([email protected], [email protected]) with a copy to the author ([email protected]). The results of this open discussion will be published in an upcoming issue of Interpreting.
Cited by (8)
Cited by 8 other publications
Boéri, Julie
Crezee, Ineke H.M. & Shirley Jülich
2020. Chapter 9. Exploring role expectations of healthcare interpreters in New Zealand. In Interpreting in Legal and Healthcare Settings [Benjamins Translation Library, 151], ► pp. 211 ff. 
Ko, Leong
2020. Translation and Interpreting Assessment Schemes: NAATI Versus CATTI. In Key Issues in Translation Studies in China [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 161 ff.
Pokorn, Nike K. & Tamara Mikolič Južnič
2020. Community interpreters versus intercultural mediators. Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:1 ► pp. 80 ff.
Ozolins, Uldis
2014. Rewriting the AUSIT Code of Ethics – principles, practice, dispute. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 60:3 ► pp. 347 ff.
Donovan, Clare
2011. Ethics in the Teaching of Conference Interpreting. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
G. Seeber, Kilian & Christian Zelger
2007. Betrayal – Vice or Virtue? An Ethical Perspective on Accuracy in Simultaneous Interpreting. Meta 52:2 ► pp. 290 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.