Article published In:
InterpretingVol. 8:1 (2006) ► pp.25–43
Probing quality criteria in simultaneous interpreting
The role of silent pauses in fluency
This article describes an empirical study designed to contribute to research into interpreting quality by moving towards a definition of the criterion of ‘fluency’ in the evaluation of simultaneous interpreting. Based on an interdisciplinary review of the literature and preliminary tests of the production and perception of pauses and their effect on speech comprehension, ‘silent pauses’ are investigated as a subparameter of fluency. Following the line of research initiated by Collados (1998), the study analyses the quality expectations of 43 expert users as well as their evaluation of German-Spanish interpretations manipulated by additional silent pauses. Although the differences found in the evaluation study cannot be shown to be statistically significant, there are trends indicating that the principal hypothesis, whereby silent pauses as a subparameter of fluency have a negative effect on fluency evaluation, has received some empirical support. Subjects appear to have detected and responded to the experimental stimulus (two levels of additional silent pauses between 2 and 6 seconds in duration) by giving lower mean ratings for ‘fluency’ to the experimental videos than to the control.
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff. 
Barranco-Droege, Rafael
2015. Too fast to be true? Exploring time compression in simultaneous interpreting. Speech Communication 75 ► pp. 84 ff.
Behr, Martina
2023. Systemic modelling. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 214 ff.
Braman, Sandra
2007. When Nightingales Break the Law: Silence and the Construction of Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 9:4 ► pp. 281 ff.
Cheung, Andrew K.F.
2015. Scapegoating the interpreter for listeners’ dissatisfaction with their level of understanding. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 17:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2020. Interpreters’ perceived characteristics and perception of quality in interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2022. Listeners’ perception of the quality of simultaneous interpreting and perceived dependence on simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Chmiel, Agnieszka, Przemysław Janikowski, Danijel Koržinek, Agnieszka Lijewska, Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny, Dariusz Jakubowski & Koen Plevoets
2023. Lexical frequency modulates current cognitive load, but triggers no spillover effect in interpreting. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff.
Chwalczuk, Monika
2022. Construction of Shared Semantic Spaces through Gestures in Interpreter-Mediated Psychotherapy Sessions. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual 9:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Collados Aís, Ángela
2017. La entonación monótona y la calidad de la interpretación simultánea: frecuencia, conceptualizaciones y efectos. Meta 61:3 ► pp. 675 ff.
Fang, Jing & Xiaomin Zhang
2021. Pause in Sight Translation: A Longitudinal Study Focusing on Training Effect. In Diverse Voices in Chinese Translation and Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 157 ff.
Gieshoff, Anne Catherine
2021. The impact of visible lip movements on silent pauses in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 23:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Gumul, Ewa
2021. Explicitation and cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 23:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Hamidi, Miriam & Franz Pöchhacker
2007. Simultaneous Consecutive Interpreting: A New Technique Put to the Test. Meta 52:2 ► pp. 276 ff.
Han, Chao
2018. Using rating scales to assess interpretation. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Han, Chao & Kerui An
2021. Using unfilled pauses to measure (dis)fluency in English-Chinese consecutive interpreting: in search of an optimal pause threshold(s). Perspectives 29:6 ► pp. 917 ff.
Han, Chao, Sijia Chen, Rongbo Fu & Qin Fan
2020. Modeling the relationship between utterance fluency and raters’ perceived fluency of consecutive
interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Jiang, Xinlei & Yue Jiang
2020. Effect of dependency distance of source text on disfluencies in interpreting. Lingua 243 ► pp. 102873 ff.
Lee, Jieun
2013. What Skills Do Student Interpreters Need to Learn in Sight Translation Training?. Meta 57:3 ► pp. 694 ff.
Lee, Sang-Bin
2015. Developing an analytic scale for assessing undergraduate students’ consecutive interpreting performances. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 17:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Lee, Sang-Bin
2019. Holistic assessment of consecutive interpretation. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 21:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Lesch, Harold & Karen Grové
2018. Interpreting services in the Western Cape Legislature. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Lin, Yumeng, Qianxi Lv & Junying Liang
2018. Predicting Fluency With Language Proficiency, Working Memory, and Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Napier, Jemina
2007. Cooperation in interpreter-mediated monologic talk. Discourse & Communication 1:4 ► pp. 407 ff.
Okoniewska, Alicja M.
2022. Interpreters’ roles in a changing environment. The Translator 28:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Pradas Macías, Macarena
2023. A review of the evolution of survey-based research on interpreting quality using two models by Franz Pöchhacker. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 68 ff.
Pérez-Luzardo Díaz, Jessica & Víctor González-Ruiz
2018. The Sound of Drivel. Lebende Sprachen 63:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Shen, Mingxia & Junying Liang
2021. Self-repair in consecutive interpreting: similarities and differences between professional interpreters and student interpreters. Perspectives 29:5 ► pp. 761 ff.
Song, Shuxian & Andrew K. F. Cheung
2019. Disfluency in relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tiselius, Elisabet & Michaela Albl-Mikasa
Wang, Xiaoman & Binhua Wang
2022. Identifying fluency parameters for a machine-learning-based automated interpreting assessment system. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff.
Yang, Liuyan
2018. Effects of three tasks on interpreting fluency. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Zhu, Yuben
2022. Exploring booth-mates’ teamwork in the time of a pandemic: A case study. Across Languages and Cultures 23:2 ► pp. 206 ff.
Zou, Bing & Binhua Wang
2023. Non-fluency and language-pair specificity in Chinese-English consecutive interpreting: A corpus-driven study. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 30 ff.
정철자
2010. The Translation Method for Teaching English: A Reflective Study of a Professional Translation Classroom. Studies in Foreign Language Education 24:2 ► pp. 19 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.