Review published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 8:1 (2006) ► pp. 120127
References
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
(1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Janet
(2000) The broader view: How freelance translators define translation competence. In Christina Schaffner & Beverly Adab (Eds.), Developing translation competence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
(1991/2000) Translation as interlingual interpretive use. In Lawrence Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 376–396.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
(1991) Paradigms gained or the art of productive disagreement. AIIC Bulletin XIX (2), 11–15.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
(1999) “Getting organized”: The evolution of community interpreting. Interpreting 4 (1), 125–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Introducing interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Christina
(Ed.) (1999) Translation and norms. Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, Danica
(1975) Langage, langues et mémoire. Étude de la prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Paris: Minard-Lettres modernes.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary, Pöchhacker, Franz & Kaindl, Klaus
(Eds.) (1994) Translation studies – an interdiscipline. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
(1995) Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, Hans J.
(1989/2000) Skopos and commission in translational action. In Lawrence Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader, London/New York: Routledge, 221–232.Google Scholar