Predicting proficiency in signed language interpreting
A preliminary study
María José López Gómez | University of Granada
Teresa Bajo Molina | University of Granada
Presentación Padilla Benítez | University of Granada
Julio Santiago de Torres | University of Granada
An empirical study was designed to identify which perceptual-motor, cognitive and personality factors may underlie both acquisition of a
signed language as a B language and development of signed language interpreting skills. If abilities that are potentially needed are found,
a previous assessment of candidates’ potential for developing signed-language interpreting skills could be useful in identifying which
students are likely to obtain good results during training. Perceptual-motor and cognitive skills, personality factors and academic
background were hypothesized as possible predictors of success. Results showed that perceptual-motor and cognitive abilities are more
important than personality traits in predicting proficiency in learning a signed language and developing signed-language interpreting
abilities. Perceptual-motor coordination is the most reliable factor for predicting signed language proficiency, followed by other cognitive
and personal factors.
Keywords: proficiency, perceptual-motor coordination, cognitive skills, personality, signed language interpreting, predictor
Published online: 01 June 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.9.1.05lop
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.9.1.05lop
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020.
In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 61 ff. 
Adams, Krista
2017. Domain-specific activities in ASL-English interpreting and their relevance to expertise development.
Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Angelelli, Claudia V.
2012.
In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 3],
► pp. 172 ff.
Arnaiz-Castro, Patricia & Jessica Pérez-Luzardo Díaz
2016. Correlation between anxiety and academic self-concept in interpreter trainees.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67 ► pp. 57 ff.
Brown, Catherine M. & Bridget Leary
2013.
In Treating NVLD in Children,
► pp. 247 ff.
Fengxia, Jiang
2015.
In Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],
► pp. 362 ff.
Fengxia, Jiang
2016.
In Psychology and Mental Health,
► pp. 862 ff.
Lee, Sang-Bin
2014. An Interpreting Self-Efficacy (ISE) scale for undergraduate students majoring in consecutive interpreting: construction and preliminary validation.
The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Martinez, David & Jenny L. Singleton
2019. Individual differences in lexical learning across two language modalities: Sign learning, word learning, and their relationship in hearing non-signing adults.
Acta Psychologica 198 ► pp. 102892 ff.
Wang, Jihong
2016. The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance.
Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Williams, Joshua T., Isabelle Darcy & Sharlene D. Newman
2017. THE BENEFICIAL ROLE OF L1 SPOKEN LANGUAGE SKILLS ON INITIAL L2 SIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:4 ► pp. 833 ff.
Yan, Jackie Xiu, Jun Pan & Honghua Wang
2018.
In Research on Translator and Interpreter Training [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 147 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.