Cover not available
Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.13–28

How social is the internet?

A pragmatic view

| University of Southern Denmark,
To many, the collocation of the terms ‘internet’ and ‘social’ may seem a bit strange, even contradictory. Either the internet is by definition social, or it is, by observation and intuition, a rather anti-social affair. The article tries to dispel this ambiguity of attribution, by focusing on both positive and negative aspects of internet practices, as we see them developing among its (often younger) users. A new vision of sociality is attributed mainly to the rise of the internet, and the consequences of a ‘fake’ social life are examined. Adaptation, both to the user and the soft/and hardware is seen as a key term in this respect, and some ethical and moral problems related to internet use are discussed with the aid of some actual cases. Finally, a general evaluation of the internet in both its positive and negative aspects is provided.
Keywords: internet, sociality, ‘fake’ life, avatar, adaptation, ethics, embodiment
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Redefining sociality
  • 3.Of avatars and aspirations
  • 4.The ‘fake’ social life and its consequences
  • 5.The pragmatics of the internet
  • 6.The internet: Adaptation and addiction
  • 7.Ethics and sociality
  • 8.‘Speed kills’ – so what about it?
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 28 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00002.mey
References (17)
References
Capone, Alessandro. 2013. “The pragmatics of indirect reports and slurring.” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco LoPiparo, and Mario Carapezza, 153–183. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. 1930 [1838]. Sartor Resartus: The Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh. London: Humphrey Milford for Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croom, Adam M. 2016. “An assessment of the negative and positive aspects of stereotypes and the derogatory and nonderogatory uses of slurs.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 792–822. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmreich, Stefan. 2000. Silicon Second Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1954. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. (transl. by Francis J. Whitfield). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Résumé of a Theory of Language (ed. by Francis J. Whitfield). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lanman, Charles R. 1920 [1883]. A Sanskrit Reader: Text and Vocabulary and Notes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2009. “Adaptability in human-computer interaction.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd edn.), ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2000. When Voices Clash: A Study in Literary Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2017. “Discourse, values, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections.” Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China: First World Congress of Legal Discourse & Fifteenth International Conference on Law and Language of the International Academy of Linguistic Law (IALL 2017, Zhejiang Police College, 16–18 May 2017).Google Scholar
Ofstad, Harald. 1961. An Inquiry into the Freedom of Decision. Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 1985. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
. 1996. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Cyberspace and identity.” Contemporary Sociology 28(6): 643–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Alone Together. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wood, Tahir. 2015. Elements of Hermeneutic Pragmatics: Agency and Interpretation. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2024.  Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha . Internet Pragmatics DOI logo
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2023. A Missing Link?. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Saz-Rubio, Ma Milagros del
2023. Assessing impoliteness-related language in response to a season's greeting posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 206 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Ying & Rashid A Saeed
2022. Optimizing the Cultivation Path of College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability from the Perspective of the Internet. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2018. (Im)politeness, morality and the internet. Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2020. (Im)politeness, morality and the internet. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.