Cover not available
Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.88–112

Tracking opinion convergence online

The effect of facial attractiveness

| Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

We investigate whether facial attractiveness, as one source of positive/negative attitudes towards one’s conversational partner, affects the degree and type of opinion convergence online, even in the absence of physical co-presence. Our hypothesis is that when you interact with someone you find attractive, opinion convergence will occur even if you are not physically co-present with them. Additionally, we tracked different types of opinion convergence (one-sided or mutual) and how convergence is linguistically negotiated in these different circumstances. Our hypothesis was confirmed, to a point. Opinion convergence was most frequent among Attracted pairs; however, opinion convergence was greatest among Neutral pairs. Opinion convergence was qualitatively different in the 3 conditions. This research adds to previous studies which highlighted aspects of communication unique to online environments (anonymity, invisibility) to explain the heightened tendency for face-threatening behaviours to occur online, by showing how implicit biases (operationalized here as facial attractiveness) can be an additional factor influencing online behaviour.

Keywords: anonymity, facial attractiveness, opinion convergence, implicit bias
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Online rudeness and the invisible other
  • 2.Previous research on the effects of lack of physical co-presence
  • 3.Motivation for the present study and research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Screening survey
    • 4.3Online chat
    • 4.4Post survey
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Degree, frequency and type of opinion convergence as a function of facial attractiveness
    • 5.2The linguistic negotiation of opinion convergence in different attractiveness conditions
  • 6.Limitations
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 28 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00005.ter
References
Bamman, David, Jacob Eisenstein, and Tyler Schnoebelen
2014 “Gender identity and lexical variation in social media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2): 135–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, Michael
2017 “Implicit bias.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Available online at: [URL]
Cloutier, Jasmin, Todd F. Heatherton, Paul J. Whalen, and William M. Kelley
2008 “Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(6): 941–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Vinet, Jaco M. Greeff, Ian D. Stephen, and David I. Perrett
2014 “Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender.” PLoS ONE 9(7): e99629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jang, Hyunseok, Juyoung Song, and Ramhee Kim
2014 “Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory.” Computers in Human Behavior 311: 85–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan, Samantha, and Mary Nell Trautner
2009 “Beauty work: Individual and institutional rewards, the reproduction of gender, and questions of agency.” Sociology Compass 3(1): 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langlois, Judith H., Lisa Kalakanis, Adam J. Rubenstein, Andrea Larson, Monica Hallam, and Monica Smoot
2000 “Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.” Psychological Bulletin 1261: 390–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipinski-Harten, Maciek, and Romin Tafarodi
2013 “Attitude moderation: A comparison of online chat and face-to-face conversation.” Computers in Human Behavior 291: 2490–2493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Wendy, and Derek Ruths
2013 “What’s in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in Twitter.” Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium. [URL]
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: the case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2578–2593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ma, Qingguo, Da Qian, Linfeng Hu, and Lei Wang
2017 “Hello handsome! Male’s facial attractiveness gives rise to female’s fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios – An ERP study.” PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Misoch, Sabina
2015 “Stranger on the internet: Online self-disclosure and the role of visual anonymity.” Computers in Human Behavior 481: 535–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moor, Peter, Ard Heuvelman, and Ria Verleur
2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior 261: 1536–1546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nithyanand, Rishab, Brian Schaffner, and Phillipa Gill
2017 “Measuring offensive speech in online political discourse.” In USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI). Vancouver, Canada. August 2017.Google Scholar
Park, Sora, Eun-Yeong Na, and Eun-mee Kim
2014 “The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying.” Children and Youth Services Review 421: 74–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reicher, Steve, Russell Spears, and Tom Postmes
1995 “A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology 61: 161–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rustagi, Mayur, R. Rajendra Prasath, Sumit Goswami, Sudeshna Sarkar, Santanu Chaudhury, Sushmita Mitra, C. A. Murthy, P. S. Sastry, and Sankar K. Pal
2009 “Learning age and gender of blogger from stylistic variation.” In Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence: Third International Conference, PReMI 2009, ed. by Santanu Chaudhury, Sushmita Mitra, C. A. Murthy, P. S. Sastry, and Sankar Kumar Pal, 205–212. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satz, Samantha, David L. Pogge, and Philip D. Harvey
2017 “Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: A study of adolescents on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit.” Presented at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, May 23, 2017, San Diego, CA.
Scott, Craig R.
2004 “Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations.” In Free Speech Yearbook, Vol. 411, ed. by S. Drucker, 127–141. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Stein, Joel
2016 “Tyranny of the mob.” TIME 108(8): 27–32.Google Scholar
Suler, John
2004 “The online disinhibition effect.” Cyberpsychology and Behavior 7(3): 321–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truong, Dan
2015 “The great equalizer 2.0”. Available online at: [URL]
Wilcox, Keit, and Andrew T. Stephen
2013 “Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control.” Journal of Consumer Research 401: 90–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar