Internet memes are an example of the trend of replicability and spread of discourses through the Net within today’s participatory culture. On paper, memes are instances of humorous discourse that abound on the internet, are replicated or altered, and then transmitted to other users. However, in this paper the focus is not on its humorous side, but on how every single stage of meme communication entails a greater or lesser impact on the user’s self-concept, self-awareness and overall identity. The paper addresses five stages of meme communication and possible ways in which these stages influence the user’s identity.
2016 “Circulación de memes en WhatsApp: Ambivalencias del humor desde la perspectiva de género.” Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales 351: 21–45.
Blackmore, Susan
1998 “Imitation and the definition of a meme.” Journal of Memetics 2(2). Available at [URL].
Blackmore, Susan
1999The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackmore, Susan
2001 “Evolution and memes: The human brain as a selective imitation device.” Cybernetics and Systems 32(1): 225–255.
Dawkins, Richard
1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
du Preez, Amanda, and Elanie Lombard
2014 “The role of memes in the construction of Facebook personae” Communicatio 40(3): 253–270.
Dynel, Marta
2016 “ ‘I has seen image macros!’ Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.
Forceville, Charles
2014 “Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication.” In Visual Communication, ed. by David Machin, 51–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, Charles, and Billy Clark
2014 “Can pictures have explicatures?” Linguagem em (Dis)curso (special issue on relevance theory) 14(3): 451–472.
Gal, Noam, Limor Shifman, and Zohar Kampf
2015 “ ‘It Gets Better’: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity.” New Media & Society 18(8): 1698–1714.
Gofton, Pete
2017 “Music, memes and meaning: A semiotic analysis.” Musicology Research 21: 27–46.
Guadagno, Rosanna E., Daniel M. Rempala, Shannon Murphy, and Bradley M. Okdie
2013 “What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes.” Computers in Human Behavior 291: 2312–2319.
Hempelmann, Christian F., and Andrea C. Samson
2008 “Cartoons: Drawn jokes?” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 609–640. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kanai, Akane
2016 “Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race, and class in a humorous meme.” Social Media + SocietyOctober-December: 1–12.
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear
2007 “Online memes, affinities, and cultural production.” In A New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Konstantineas, Charalambos, and George Vlachos
2012 “Internet Memes: Humor in late modernity and encroachment upon the mainstream.” Inter-disciplinary.net.
Laineste, Liisi, and Piret Voolaid
2016 “Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes.” European Journal of Humour Research 4(4): 26–49.
Meikle, Graham
2016Social Media. Communication, Sharing and Visibility. Abingdon: Routledge.
Milner, Ryan M.
2012The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media. PhD Thesis. University of Kansas.
Miltner, Kate M.
2014 “ ‘There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats’: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme.” First Monday 19(8).
Naughton, John
2012From Gutenberg to Zuckerberg: What You Really Need to Know about the Internet. London: Quercus.
Nissenbaum, Asaf, and Limor Shifman
2017 “Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board.” New Media & Society 19(4): 483–501.
Postmes, Tom, and Nancy Baym
2005 “Intergroup dimensions of the internet.” In Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives, ed. by Jake Harwood, and Howard Giles, 213–238. New York: Peter Lang.
Segev, Elad, Asaf Nissenbaum, Nathan Stolero, and Limor Shifman
2015 “Families and networks of Internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 201: 417–433.
Shifman, Limor
2014Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shophocleous, Andry, and Christiana Themistocleus
2014 “Projecting social and discursive identities through code-switching on Facebook: The case of Greek Cypriots.” Language@Internet 111.
Sperber, Dan
1984 “Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations.” Man 201: 73–89.
Sperber, Dan
1996Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Taecharungroj, Viriya, and Pitchganut Nueangjamnong
2014 “The effect of humour on virality: The study of Internet memes on social media.” Paper presented at
7th International Forum on Public Relations and Advertising Media Impacts on Culture and Social Communication
. Bangkok, August.
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1171–1188.
Wharton, Tim
2009Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, Bradley E., and G. Bret Bowers
2015 “Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape.” New Media & Society 17(11): 1886–1906.
Yoon, InJeon
2016 “Why is it not just a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education 331: 92–123.
Yus, Francisco
1997 “La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia-resolución.” Pragmalingüística 3–4: 497–508.
Yus, Francisco
2002 “Stand-up comedy and cultural spread: The case of sex roles.” Babel A.F.I.A.L., special issue on humour studies, p. 245–292.
2005 “Dave Allen’s stand-up monologues: An epidemiological approach.” In Thistles. A homage to Brian Hughes. Volume 2: Essays in Memoriam, ed. by José Mateo, and Francisco Yus, 317–344. Alicante: University of Alicante, Department of English Studies.
Yus, Francisco
2007 “Weblogs: Web pages in search of a genre?” In The Texture of Internet. Netlinguistics in Progress, ed. by. Santiago Posteguillo, María José Esteve, and M. Lluïsa Gea-Valor, 118–142. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Yus, Francisco
2009 “Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account.” In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. by Charles Forceville, and Eduardio Uriós-Aparisi, 145–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2016b “Towards a cyberpragmatics of mobile instant messaging.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Culture and Society in the Networked Age, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 7–26. Berlin: Springer.
Yus, Francisco
2016c “Discourse, contextualization and identity shaping. The case of social networking sites and virtual worlds.” In Technology Implementation in Higher Education for Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies, ed. by María Luisa Carrió-Pastor, 71–88. Singapore: Springer.
2107a “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 66–86.
Yus, Francisco
2017b “Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes.” Lingua 1971: 103–122.
Yus, Francisco
2018 “Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the Internet.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 283–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, Francisco
forthcoming a. “Relevance from and beyond propositions. The case of online identity.” In Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges ed. by Hishashi Nasu, and Jan Strassheim Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
2019. 2019 Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), ► pp. 44 ff.
Clark, Billy
2020. Identity inferences: Implicatures, implications and extended interpretations. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 424 ff.
2022. Negotiating and Performing Vietnamese Cultural Identity Using Memes: A Multiple Case Study of Vietnamese Youth. In Dismantling Cultural Borders Through Social Media and Digital Communications, ► pp. 251 ff.
2023. Internet Memes – Funktionen und Motivationen. In Digitale Pragmatik [Digitale Linguistik, 1], ► pp. 153 ff.
Fetzer, Anita & Daniel Weiss
2020. Doing things with quotes: Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 157 ► pp. 84 ff.
García-Gómez, Antonio
2020. Intercultural and interpersonal communication failures: analyzing hostile interactions among British and Spanish university students on WhatsApp. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Giorgi, Giulia
2022. Methodological Directions for the Study of Memes. In Handbook of Research on Advanced Research Methodologies for a Digital Society [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ], ► pp. 627 ff.
Hajimichael, Mike
2021. Social Memes and Depictions of Refugees in the EU: Challenging Irrationality and Misinformation with a Media Literacy Intervention. In The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era [Postdigital Science and Education, ], ► pp. 195 ff.
Ivan, Loredana
2023. Interpersonal Communication in the Information Age: Opportunities and Disruptions. American Behavioral Scientist 67:7 ► pp. 885 ff.
Larson, Lindsay R.L. & Jordan Salvador
2020. Unsanctioned user-generated content: student perceptions of academic brand parody. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 26:2 ► pp. 365 ff.
2019. The daily dose of digital inspiration 2: Themes and affective user responses to meaningful memes in social media. New Media & Society 21:10 ► pp. 2201 ff.
Rogers, Richard & Giulia Giorgi
2023. What is a meme, technically speaking?. Information, Communication & Society► pp. 1 ff.
2019. METHODS OF WORKING WITH THE INTERNET MEMES WHILE FORMING SENIOR PUPILS’ SOCIOCULTURAL COMPETENCE IN THE PROCESS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :11 ► pp. 451 ff.
2020. (Non-)quoting and subjectivity in online discourse. E-rea :17.2
Westbrook, Fiona, Elise Hunkin & Jayne White
2021. Lost in Translation: an Experiment with Memes for Research Translation in Australian Early Childhood Education and Care (ecec) Contexts. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.