Article published In:
Internet PragmaticsVol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.134–160
Relational work in multimodal networked interactions on Facebook
The paper argues that the notion of Relational Work (Locher and Watts 2005) needs to be expanded to be able to account for sociability in the networked interactions afforded by social platforms such as Facebook. Thus, the aim of this paper is to explore how the nature of networked interactions impacts the emergence of relational practices therein. Importantly, Relational Work is a language based framework whereas networked interactions are highly multimodal. By applying Norris’ (2004) multimodal framework to the analysis of a Facebook wall event, we show how key sociability functions are carried out by semiotic modes other than language. Furthermore, the analysis shows how relational behaviors (such as politeness, impoliteness, etc.) are highly intertwined and should not be compartmentalized, as has traditionally been the case.
Keywords: Relational Work, multimodality, networked interactions, Facebook, im/politeness
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Facebook interactions and RW
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Theoretical frameworks and procedure
- 4.Analysis and discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2014a “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 4–18. 
2014b “Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking.” Discourse, Context and Media 4–5: 62–73.
2015 “Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism 19(2): 185–205.
Blommaert, Jan, and Malgorzata Szabla
2017 “Does context really collapse in social media interaction?” Plenary paper presented at the conference on Moving Texts: Mediations and Transculturations
. Aveiro, 12 July 2017.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 501–521.
Bousfield, Derek
2007 “Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2185–2216.
boyd, danah, and Alice E. Marwick
2011 “Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies.” Work‐in‐progress paper for discussion at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference on June 2, 2011 in Berkeley, CA.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castells, Manuel
2000 “Toward a sociology of the network society.” Contemporary Sociology 29(5): 693–699.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show the weakest link.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 35–72.
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness revisited with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579.
Danet, Brenda
2013 “Flaming and linguistic impoliteness on a listserv.” In Pragmatics of Computer- Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 639–664. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome’ Publishing.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2009 “Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: the culture wars.” Journal of Politeness Research 51: 273–304.
2010a “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
2010b “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2(1): 46–94.
2012 “Politics, ‘lies’ and YouTube: A genre approach to assessments of im/politeness on Obama’s 9/9/2009 presidential address.” In New Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Lucía Fernández-Amaya, Maria de la O Hernández López, Reyes Gómez Morón, Manuel Padilla Cruz, Manuel Mejias Borrero, and Mariana Relinque Barranca, 62–90. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2013 Face, identity, and im/politeness: Looking backwards, moving forward – From Goffman to practice theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1-33.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Tereza Spilioti
2016 “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.
Georgalou, Mariza
2016 “ ‘I make the rules on my wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook.” Discourse & Communication 10(1): 40–64.
Graham, Sage G.
2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(4): 742–759.
Haugh, Michael, and Dereck Bousfield
2012 “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1099–1114.
Haugh, Michael
2007 “The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 295–317.
2010 “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2106–2119.
2014 “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 76–99.
Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos
2015 “Computer-mediated discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 128–151. Chichester: Wiley.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004 “Introducing polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 1–24.
Kozinets, Robert V.
2010 Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Lee, Carmen K. M.
2011 “Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices.” In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow, and Kristine Mroczek, 110–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locher, Miriam A.
2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 1–5.
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard Watts
2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–2593.
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2013 ““Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 511: 47–67.
Maíz Arévalo, Carmen
2015 “Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 289–327.
Markham, Annette, and Elizabeth Buchanan
2012 Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). [URL]
Marwick, Alice E., and dannah boyd
2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy
1985 “Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation.” Journal of Linguistics 211: 339–384.
Norris, Sigrid
2004 Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
Page, Ruth E.
2010 “Revisiting narrativity: Small stories in status updates.” Text and Talk 30 (4): 423–444.
2012 Stories and Social Media. Identities and Interaction. Oxford: Routledge.
Papacharissi, Zizi
2011 “Conclusion: A networked self.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 304–318. New York: Routledge.
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
2014 “Introduction: The language of social media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 1–20. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant
2014 “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2016 “Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 339–353. Abingdon: Routledge.
Terkourafi, Marina
2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(2): 237–262.
Watts, Richard
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West, Laura, and Anna M. Trester
2013 “Facework on Facebook.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna M. Trester, 133–154. Washington, D.A.: Georgetown University Press.
Zimmer, Michael
2010 “But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook.” Ethics & Information Technology 12(4): 313–325.
Cited by
Cited by 16 other publications
Ahmad, Muhammad Sohail, Shazmeen Nawaz, Sundas Khan & Zainab Bukhari
2023. Digital Pakistan in COVID-19: rethinking language use at social media platforms. Frontiers in Education 8 
Björkenfeldt, Oscar & Linnea Gustafsson
2023. Impoliteness and morality as instruments of destructive informal social control in online harassment targeting Swedish journalists. Language & Communication 93 ► pp. 172 ff.
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2019. Chapter 9. Relational practices on commercial Facebook wall interactions. In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300], ► pp. 223 ff.
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2021. Evaluation, Conflict and Prescriptive Metapragmatic Comments: (Re)constructing Transmedia Stories. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 189 ff.
Collins, Luke
2020. Chapter 8. Working with images and emoji in the 🦆 Dukki Facebook Corpus. In Corpus Approaches to Social Media [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 98], ► pp. 175 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2021. Chapter 2. Computer-mediated discourse in context. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 47 ff.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Patricia Bou-Franch
2019. Introduction to Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. In Analyzing Digital Discourse, ► pp. 3 ff.
Kumar, Ritesh
Labinaz, Paolo & Marina Sbisà
2021. Chapter 5. Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 145 ff.
Page, Ruth
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2020. “Ya bloody drongo!!!”. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 67 ff.
Vasileva, Viktoria & Liubov Ivanova
2021. Speech etiquette of professional online communities. Russian Journal of Communication 13:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Vásquez, Camilla
2021. “I appreciate u not being a total prick …”: Oppositional stancetaking, impoliteness and relational work in adversarial Twitter interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 40 ff.
Vásquez, Camilla & Ramona Kreis
2023. Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Yus, Francisco
2023. Social Media and Computer-Mediated Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context, ► pp. 455 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.