The discussion in this paper proposes to shed light on a hitherto under-researched area: commenting on in-memoriam columns. Borrowing the basic notions of deliberative and epidictic genres from classical rhetoric and accommodating them to a pragmatic study of online interaction between commenters and columnists, readers’ comments are conceived as follow-ups, which necessarily re-contextualize the initiating column. The mixed character of the initiating columns, which combine deliberative and epidictic features, encourages the commenters to choose between different readings of the columns in context, and exercise their discursive power in re-contextualizing the commenting/column interaction. The analysis suggests that in the data discussed here, commenters manifest clear preference for the epidictic. By so doing, they depart from norms of deliberation manifest in habitual political commenting. On a more general level, the analysis supports the initial claim, namely that by choosing between different readings of the initiating columns and following-up on them, commenters have the discursive power to shape and re-shape the interaction through preferred commenting strategies.
2000L’argumentation dans le Discours: Discours Politique, Littérature d’Idées. Nathan: Paris.
Amossy, Ruth, and Roselyne Koren
2010 “La <diabolisation>: Un avatar du discours polémique au prisme des présidentielles de 2007.” In Au Corps du Texte: Hommage à Georges Molinié, ed. by Delphine Denis, Mireille Huchon, Anna Jaubert, Michael Rinn, and Olivier Soutet, 219–236. Champion: Paris.
1954Rhetoric (transl. by W. Rhys Roberts, Ingram Bywater, and Friedrich Solmsen). New York: Modern Library.
2016Readers’ Comments on Op-Eds – Evaluation and Response to Irony. M. A. thesis, Bar-Ilan University.
2011Aharey Mot, Ha’ayin hashvi’it (after death, The Seventh Eye) 351, 01.11.2011. (in Hebrew)
2004 “Expanding dialogue: the Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy.” In After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, ed. by Nick Crossley, and John Michael Roberts, 131–155. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dori-Haohen, Gonen, and Nimrod Shavit
2013 “The cultural meanings of Israeli Tokbek (Talk-Back Online Commenting) and their relevance to the online democratic public sphere.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 6 (4): 361–379.
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2015 “Introduction.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains, ed. by Elda Weizman, and Anita Fetzer, IX–XIX. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2007 “To talk and talkback: Analyzing the rhetoric of talkbacks in online journalism.” Online Newspapers in Israel, ed. by Tehila Shwattz-Altshuler, 321–350. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. (in Hebrew)
. (3rd century ADtr.1959) Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book 1(transl. by Robert Drew Hicks). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
2011 “User generated content in the Israeli online journalism Landscape.” Israel Affairs 1731: 422–444.
2014Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (transl. by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Quintillian, Institutio Oratoria Book III
transl. by H. E. Butler Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press [URL] acc. May 15, 2017
Richardson, John E., and James Stanyer
2011 “Reader opinion in the digital age: tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice.” Journalism 12(8): 983–1003.
1982The Rhetoric of News in the Israel Radio: Some Implications of Language and Style for Newstelling. Bochum: Studienverlag N. Brockmeyer.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Sterling, Christopher H.
(ed.)2009Encyclopedia of Journalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Upadhyay, Shiv R.
2010 “Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (1): 105–127.
2011 “Conveying indirect reservations through discursive redundancy.” Language Sciences 33(2): 295–304.
2012 “Negotiating irony through follow-ups: Readers’ comments on op-eds in the daily press.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May-2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elizabeth Reber. [URL]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.