Cover not available
Article published In:
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 1:2] 2018
► pp. 216–241

The personal and/as the political

Small stories and impoliteness in online discussions of the Greek crisis

| King’s College London
| King’s College London

Drawing on our previous work on the role of small stories in social-mediatized engagements with the Greek socio-economic crisis (Georgakopoulou 2014, 2015), in this article, we set out to shed light on impoliteness on social media through the lens of small stories research. We explore how Facebook and YouTube commenters “bash” political leaders and perceived political opponents and attribute blame to them for the crisis, through comments that attest to specific links of doing impoliteness with storying the crisis. Bashing has been previously related to the affective reactions of participants in online comments on current affairs. In this case, we bring to the fore a salient combination in our data of (mainly on-record) impoliteness strategies for bashing politicians with specific narrating positions in stories about the crisis: the narrator as sufferer, as witness of suffering, and as spokesperson for collective suffering. We argue that in all these cases, on-record impoliteness is normally placed at the end of a small story and presented as legitimated and justified by the preceding account. We conclude with the implications of the association of impoliteness targeting public figures with social-mediatized processes of personalizing and constructing expertise on the basis of experience on the one hand and, on the other hand, of jointly (re)asserting moral order in political affairs.

Keywords: narrating positions, bashing, online comments, Greek crisis, small stories, on-record impoliteness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Impoliteness and political debates on Facebook and YouTube
  • 2.Data and methods
    • 2.1The political context of the data
    • 2.2Analyzing impoliteness and small stories online
  • 3.Impoliteness and small stories: Narrating positions and personal experience
    • 3.1The narrator as sufferer
      • 3.1.1The suffering subject as co-constructed between commenters
    • 3.2The narrator as a witness of suffering
    • 3.3The narrator as spokesperson for collective suffering
    • 3.4Impoliteness and small stories: Sequential relations and actions
  • 4.Personalizing impoliteness: Identities of expertise & (re)asserting moral order
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00011.geo
References
Arundale, Robert
2009 “Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: an alternative to Goffman.” In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 33–54. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgrakopoulou
2008 “Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis.” Text & Talk 28(3): 377–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behar, Ruth
1990 “Rage and redemption: Reading the life story of a mexican marketing woman.” Feminist Studies 16(2): 223–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2015 “Revisiting online conflict in social networking sites: The role of anonymity/familiarity.” Paper presented at the 9th International Impoliteness Conference, Athens, Greece, 1–3 June 2015.
boyd, danah, and Alice Marwick
2011 “Social steganography: Privacy in networked publics.” Paper presented at the International Communications Association, Boston, USA, 28 May 2011. [URL].
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conover, Michael D., Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer
2011 “Political polarization on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ed. by Lada Adamic, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Scott Counts, 89–0 96. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry
2017 “Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Eric
2013 “Impoliteness in computer mediated communication.” Unpublished Master Thesis, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Drayton, Katherine
2017 “Impoliteness and conflict in an online football fandom.” Paper presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference, Belfast, Ireland, 16–21 June 2017.
Dynel, Marta
2012 “Swearing methodologically: The (im) politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube.” Journal of English Studies (10): 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eastmond, Marita
2007 “Stories as lived experience: Narratives in forced migration research. Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2): 248–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
el-Nawawy, Mohammed, and Sarah Khamis
2013 Egyptian Revolution 2.0: Political Blogging, Civic Engagement, and Citizen Journalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Göran
2014 “See the error of your ways: Belligerent expertise and the curative power of ‘tough love’.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 17(6): 573–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Carol Fleisher, Bruner Jerome, Renderer Bobby, and Sally Spitzer
1990 “Narrative comprehension.” In Narrative Thought and Narrative Language, ed. by Bruce Britton, and Anthony Pellegrini, 1–79. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. New York: ICL Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton Youtube video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–2593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol .” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1964 “Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems 11(3): 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2009 “Reflecton and self-disclosure from the small stories perspective: A study of identity claims in interview and conversational data.” In Telling Stories, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Anna De Fina, and Anastasia Nylund, 226–247. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 55–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Small stories transposition and social media: A microperspective on the ‘Greek crisis’.” Discourse & Society 25(4): 519–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances.” Discourse, Context & Media 91: 64–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a “From narrating the self to posting self (ies): A small stories approach to selfies.” Open Linguistics 21: 300–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b “ ‘Friendly’ comments: Interactional displays of alignment on Facebook and YouTube.” In Social Media Discourse,(Dis)identifications and Diversities, ed. by Sirpa Leppanen, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytola, 189–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Cedric Deschrijver
eds. forthcoming The social mediatization of the economy: Texts, discourses and participation Special issue Language@Internet
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Korina Giaxoglou
forthcoming. “Emplotment in the social mediatization of the economy: The poly-storying of economist Yanis Varoufakis.” Language@Internet.
Goudet, Laura
2010 “Alternative spellings and censhorship: The treatment of profanities in virtual communities.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Dennis Jobert, 209–223. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinsliff, Gaby
2010 “Web 2.0: the new election superweapon.” The Guardian. [URL] (accessed 20 July 2017).
Hopkinson, Chris
2014 “Face effects of verbal antagonism in online discussions.” Brno Studies in English 40(1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1978 “Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, Michael Haugh, and Wei-Ling Melody Chang
2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards.” Multilingua 32(3): 343–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klofstad, Casey, Anand Edward Sokhey, and Scott D. McClurg
2013 “Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 120–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopf, Martina
2010 “Trauma, narrative and the art of witnessing.” In Slavery in Art and Literature: Approaches to Trauma, Memory and Visuality, ed. by Birgit Haehnel, and Melanie Ulz, 41–58. Berlin: Frank & Timm.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia G.
2014 “Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement?” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 53–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letts, Marcus
2009 “Obama’s discourse of ‘hope’: Making rhetoric work politically.” Bsc Dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Lindholm, Maiju
2012 “Identity construction in a pwnage video on YouTube.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia, and Peter Lunt
1994 Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljung, Magnus
2011 Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Loader, Brian D., Ariadne Vromen, and Michael Xenos
2014 “The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement.” Information, Communication and Society 17(2): 143–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Heidi
2002 “ ‘YOUR VIEWS SHOWED TRUE IGNORANCE!!!’: (Mis)communication in an online interracial discussion forum.” Computers and Composition 191: 411–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinl, Marja E.
2013 Electronic Complaints: An Empirical Study on British English and German Complaints on eBay. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth
2015 “The Narrative Dimensions of Social Media Storytelling.” In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ed. by Anna De Fina, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 329–349. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, Barton David, Johann Unger, and Michele Zappavigna
2014 Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Namsu, Kerk F. Kee, and Sebastian Valenzuela
2009 “Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(6): 729–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
2009 “The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond.” In Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, ed. by Andrew Chadwick, and Philip N. Howar, 230–245. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015 “Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality.” Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 307–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennanen, Satu Pauliina
2013 “The structure of impolite events in computer-mediated communication: Insulting adjectives in comments on a discussion board of CNN US news piece.” Unpublished Pro Gradu Thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Perelmutter, Renee
2013 “Klassika Zhanra: The flamewar as a genre in the Russian blogosphere.” Journal of Pragmatics 45(1): 74–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen
2014 Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Qiu, Lin, Han Lin, Leung Angela, and William Tov
2012 “Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(10): 569–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Ian
2014 “Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017 “(Im) politeness and identity.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im) politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 227–256. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant
2016 “Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Teresa Spilioti, 339–353. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, Graeme
2010 Οrdinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla
2014 “ ‘Usually not one to complain but…’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 65–90. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilaki, Maria
forthcoming. “Impoliteness strategies in the comments of Greek political posts: The case of Facebook and YouTube.” PhD Dissertation, King’s College London.
Wodak, Ruth
2009 Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Sally
2001 “Why Australians hate politicians: Exploring the new public discontent.” In For the People: Reclaiming Our Government: Labor Essays, ed. by Dennis Glover, and Glenn Patmore, 171–182. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Alex Georgakopoulou
2021. Analysing Identity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Hatzidaki, Ourania & Ioannis E. Saridakis
2020. Discourses of aggression in Greek digitally-mediated communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Saz-Rubio, Ma Milagros del
2023. Assessing impoliteness-related language in response to a season's greeting posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 206 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Vasilaki, Maria
2020. Dear friends, traitors and filthy dogs. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.