Cover not available
Article published In:
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 1:2] 2018
► pp. 303–328

Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming

| University of Memphis

In recent years, eSports, online gaming, and live computer game streaming have grown into a global, multi-million dollar industry. In the context of online gaming, however, there is a prevailing moral order (Kádár 2017) that allows and perhaps even encourages impoliteness against female gamers, positioning them as inferior, unwelcome, or peripheral. Drawing from a corpus of over 150 hours of live game streams and concurrent open-forum chat, this paper identifies rituals and tropes (such as spam and banter) that reinforce gendered practices as they relate to the moral order in the online gaming setting. It then explores strategies used by one female gamer to manipulate the expectations of the online gaming medium and its hegemonic notions of femininity. In this way, she can resist a moral order which positions her as disempowered, and thereby gain social capital within the community.

Keywords: multimodal, impoliteness, digital communication, moral order, computer-mediated communication, gender
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1Game studies
    • 2.2The moral order and rules of games
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Ritual and moral order in the venue of online gaming
    • 3.2Data
    • 3.3Methods
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Rules as markers of the moral order
    • 4.2Being a “boobie streamer”
    • 4.3Rituals that reflect the moral order
      • 4.3.1Ritual One: Choosing champions
      • 4.3.2Ritual two: Spam
      • 4.3.3Ritual three: “Boobie banter”
    • 4.4Objectification versus morality
  • 5.Discussion and further directions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00014.lam
References
Brehm, Audrey
2013 “Navigating the feminine in massive multiplayer online games: Gender in World of Warcraft .” Frontiers in Psychology 41 (Article 903): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cote, Amanda C.
2017 “ ‘I can defend myself’: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online.” Games and Culture 12(2): 136–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Anastacio, Cecilia
2016 “The mum who moderates her daughter’s Rowdy Twitch chat.” Kotaku UK. [URL] (accessed 8 January 2018).
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1992 “Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live.” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. by Kira Hall, Mary Buchholtz, and Birch Moonwomon, 89–99. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.Google Scholar
Ensslin, Astrid
2012 The Language of Gaming. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entertainment Software Association
2017 “Essential facts about the computer and video game industry.” [URL] (accessed 2 February 2018).
Gee, John P.
2015 Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds, and Video Games. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L.
2008 “A manual for impoliteness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 “Relationality, friendship and identity.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017 “Politeness and impoliteness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 459–491. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Interaction and conflict in digital communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Conflict, ed. by Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Scott Dutt
2019 “ ‘Watch the potty mouth’: Negotiating impoliteness in online gaming.” In Approaches to Videogame Discourse: Lexis, Interaction, Textuality, ed. by Astrid Ensslin, and Isabel Balteiro. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Kishonna L.
2012 “Intersecting oppressions and online communities: Examining the experiences of women of color in Xbox Live.” Information, Communication and Society 15(3): 411–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Teresa
2013 “Email hoaxes.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Deiter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 387–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavé, Jean, and Ettienne Wenger
1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2013 “Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 138–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Sage L. Graham
2010 “Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maher, Brenden
2016 “Can a video game company tame toxic behavior?” Nature 5311: 568–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Elizabeth, and Daniel Z. Kádár
2017 “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 4(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massanari, Adrienne
2017 “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures.” New Media and Society 19(3): 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Meghan
2015 “Anita Sarkeesian’s new video takes on male entitlement.” Feminist Current. [URL] (accessed 9 February 2018).
Newon, Lisa
2011 “Multimodal creativity and identities of expertise in the digital ecology of a World of Warcraft guild.” In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow, and Kristine Mroczek, 131–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Online multiplayer games.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 289–304. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1981 Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Aston
2018 “Ur so hawt: The presentation of gender in online streaming.” Quaesitum Undergraduate Research Journal 51: 162–191.Google Scholar
Riot Games
2015–2017 League of Legends. Los Angeles: Riot Games, Inc.Google Scholar
Rockstar
1997–2009 Grand Theft Auto. New York: Rockstar Games.Google Scholar
Salter, Michael
2018 “From geek masculinity to Gamergate: the technological rationality of online abuse.” Crime Media Culture 14(2): 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salter, Anastasia, and Bridget Blodgett
2017 Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Patricia
2014 “Business of being a female gamer.” Geeks. [URL] (accessed 8 January 2018).
Sarkeesian, Anita
2016 “All the slender ladies: Body diversity in video games.” [URL] (accessed 1 April 2018).
Shaw, Adrienne
2011 “Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity.” New Media and Society 14(1): 28–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2002 “Agonism in academic discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1651–1669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Björkenfeldt, Oscar & Linnea Gustafsson
2023. Impoliteness and morality as instruments of destructive informal social control in online harassment targeting Swedish journalists. Language & Communication 93 ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Dutt, Scott & Sage Graham
2023. Video, talk and text: How do parties communicate coherently across modalities in live videostreams?. Discourse, Context & Media 55 ► pp. 100726 ff. DOI logo
Ferenčík, Milan
2020. Politeness and social change: The metapragmatics of Slovakia's 2018 ʽdecent revolutionʼ. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Mark R
2022. Humour and Comedy in Digital Game Live Streaming. New Media & Society ► pp. 146144482210951 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Ariel & Lucien Brown
2019. Agency and impoliteness in Korean online interactions. Internet Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Meisner, Colten
2023. Networked Responses to Networked Harassment? Creators’ Coordinated Management of “Hate Raids” on Twitch. Social Media + Society 9:2 ► pp. 205630512311796 ff. DOI logo
Messerli, Thomas C. & Miriam A. Locher
2024. Responding to subtitled K-drama: Artefact-orientation in timed comments. Discourse, Context & Media 58 ► pp. 100756 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Sakai, Noboru
2019. How much reading between the lines is there in online game playing?. Internet Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong & Francisco Yus
2020. Bonding across Chinese social media. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:3 ► pp. 431 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.