Article published in:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:2 (2019) ► pp. 206232
References

References

Al Rashdi, Fathiya
2015 “Forms and functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Alcántara Plá, Manuel
2014 “Las Unidades discursivas en los mensajes instantáneos de wasap [Discursive units in WhatsApp instant messages].” Estudios de Lingüística del Español [Studies in Spanish Linguistics] 35: 223–242.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S., and Richard Ling
2011 “Necessary smileys & useless periods.” Visible Language 45(1–2): 46–67.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Justine
(ed.) 2000Small Talk. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coupland, Justine, Nikolas Coupland, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
1992 “ ‘How are you?’: Negotiating phatic communion.” Language in Society 21: 207–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darics, Erika
2013 “Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: The case of letter repetition.” Discourse, Context & Media 2(3): 141–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derks, Daantje, Arjan E. R. Bos, and Jasper von Grumbkow
2007 “Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context.” Computers in Human Behavior 23(1): 842–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
2010 “Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force.” Communication Theory 20(3): 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Færch, Claus, and Gabriele Kasper
1982 “Phatic, metalingual and metacommunicative functions in discourse: Gambits and repairs.” In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, ed. by Nils Erik Enkvist, 71–103. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod
1997 “The listener and minimal responses in conversational interaction.” Prospect 12(2): 12–32.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.” Psychiatry 18(3): 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, Barry
2016 “Emoticons as a medium for channeling politeness within American and Japanese online blogging communities.” Language & Communication 48: 53–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, Dipti
2014 “Exploring Jakobson’s ‘phatic function’ in instant messaging interactions.” Discourse & Communication 8(2): 117–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, John
1975 “Communicative functions of phatic communion.” In Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, ed. by Adam Kendon, Richard M. Harris, and Mary R. Key, 215–238. The Hague: Mouton & Co.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923 “The Problem of meaning in primitive languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. by Charles K. Ogden, John P. Postgate, and Ivor A. Richards, 451–510. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2015 “Typographic alteration in formal computer-mediated communication.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 212: 140–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael
2003 “Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(1): 33–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Vincent
2008 “New media, networking and phatic culture.” Convergence 14(4): 387–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2004 “On the social importance of phatic utterances: Some considerations for a relevance-theoretic approach.” In Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics, ed. by Pilar Garcés Conejos, Reyes Gómez Morón, Lucía Fernández Amaya, and Manuel Padilla Cruz, 199–216. Sevilla: Intercultural Pragmatics Research Group.Google Scholar
2007 “Metarepresentations and phatic utterances: A pragmatic proposal about the generation of solidarity between interlocutors.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Joanna Nijakowska, 110–128. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
2019 “Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender.” Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 163–189. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Robert R., Robert J. Spencer, and Darcy L. Mandell
2007 “Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(3): 299–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampietro, Agnese
2016 “Emoticonos y emojis: Análisis de su historia, difusión y uso en la comunicación digital actual [Emoticons and emojis: Analysis of their history, dissemination and use in current digital communication].” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Schandorf, Michael
2013 “Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text.” Convergence 19(3): 319–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
1987 “Topic selection in phatic communication.” Multilingua 6(3): 247–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siebenhaar, Beat
2017 “Accommodation in WhatsApp communication.” Paper presented at the 6th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora. University of Antwerp, 17–18 September 2017.
Walther, Joseph B.
1996 “Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction.” Communication Research 23(1): 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2004 “The intonation of Please-requests: A corpus-based study.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(9): 1521–1549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2014 “Not all emoticons are created equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14(3): 511–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 66–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir
1998 “What is ‘phatic communication?’.” In Current Issues in Relevance Theory, ed. by Villy Rouchota, and Andreas Jucker, 327–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir, and Billy Clark
1999 “Phatic interpretations and phatic communication.” Journal of Linguistics 35(2): 321–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Bai, Qiyu, Qi Dan, Zhe Mu & Maokun Yang
2019. A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2020. Managing conflict originated by feminism. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Messerli, Thomas C. & Miriam A. Locher
2021. Humour support and emotive stance in comments on Korean TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics 178  pp. 408 ff. Crossref logo
Sampietro, Agnese
2021. Emojis and the performance of humour in everyday electronically-mediated conversation. Internet Pragmatics 4:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021.  In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Xiran & Meichun Liu
2021. The pragmatics of text-emoji co-occurrences on Chinese social media. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1  pp. 144 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.