Article published in:
Understanding Chinese Social Media
Edited by Sumin Zhao and Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 4:2] 2021
► pp. 272–294

“The murderer is him ✓”

Multimodal humor in danmu video comments

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
This paper analyzes humorous comments created through a popular viewing-and-commenting system used in China and Japan, known as danmu (or danmaku). This system enables its users to superimpose anonymous comments on the video frame, which are displayed in subsequent viewing. We collected 327 user-selected ‘funniest’ screenshots of comments from danmu video sharing sites. Using content and discourse analysis, we re-contextualized the comments and identified main mechanisms of humor. Results show that speakers make fun of the plot, characters and of each other, relating to the video frame, Chinese culture and Japanese fandom. They rely on non-aggressive but rather playful teasing, allusions and retorts, and apply multimodal resources such as color, layout, and symbols to enhance the humorous effect. Our study contributes to the emerging research focus on multimodal humor (Yus 2016), social semiotics and a discursive approach to danmu-mediated communication.
Keywords: danmaku , affordances, incongruity, semiotic modes, video sharing, Bilibili
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Humor and the danmu language
  • 3.Multimodality and semiotic modes of danmu
  • 4.Data collection and analysis
  • 5.Constructing humor through multimodal resources
    • 5.1Making fun of the plot
    • 5.2Making fun of the characters
    • 5.3Making fun of each other
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 16 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00038.zha
References
Adami, Elisabetta
2009 “ ‘We/YouTube’: Exploring sign-making in video-interaction.” Visual Communication 8(4): 379–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
(ed.) 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi
2003 “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm.” Humor 16(2): 243–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” Humor 41: 293–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1984 Rabelais and His World, trans. by Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Phil
2017 The Discourse of YouTube: Multimodal Text in a Global Context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bilibili
2019 “Bilibili Inc. announces fourth quarter 2018 and fiscal year 2018 financial results.” http://​ir​.bilibili​.com​/news​-releases​/news​-release​-details​/bilibili​-inc​-announces​-fourth​-quarter​-2018​-and​-fiscal​-year​-2018 (accessed 3 March 2019).
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde
1997 “From bonding and biting: Conversational joking and identity display.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 275–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yue, Qin Gao, and Pei Luen Patrick Rau
2017 “Watching a movie alone yet together: Understanding reasons for watching Danmaku videos.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 54(4): 731–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zhen Troy
2021 “Poetic prosumption of animation, comic, game and novel in a post-socialist China: A case of a popular video-sharing social media Bilibili as heterotopia.” Journal of Consumer Culture 21(2): 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
2007 “Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 29–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Cintas, Jorge
2018 “ ‘Subtitling’s a carnival’: New practices in cyberspace.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 301: 127–149.Google Scholar
Djonov, Emilia, and Theo van Leeuwen
2013 “Between the grid and composition: Layout in PowerPoint’s design and use.” Semiotica 1971: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Tessa
2017 “Hecklevision, barrage cinema and bullet screens: An intercultural analysis.” Participations: Journal of Audience & Receptions Studies 14(2): 571–589.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2008 “No aggression, only teasing.” Lodz Paper in Pragmatics 4(2): 241–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a Humorous Garden‑Paths: A Cognitive‑Pragmatic Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2009b “Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5): 1284–1299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “ ‘I has seen Image Macros!’ Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 1–29.Google Scholar
Francesconi, Sabrina
2011 “Multimodally expressed humour shaping Scottishness in tourist postcards.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 9(1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgalou, Mariza
2017 Discourse and Identity on Facebook. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and Christian Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2000 “Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 709–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “The pragmatics of humor support.” Humor 14(1): 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2005 “Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: negotiating norms and identifying contestation.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 121–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Sharing a laugh: pragmatic aspects of humour and gender in the workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 26–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Chi-Hua
2015 “The verbal art of tucao and face-threatening acts in danmu screening.” Chinese Language and Discourse 6(2): 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel
2013 “Polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of Nicovideo.” Japanese Studies 33(3): 297–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
2001 Multimodal Discourses: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2002 “Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour.” Visual Communication 1(3): 343–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd edn.). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, Seio
2019 “The sociability of Millennials in cyberspace: A comparative analysis of barrage subtitling in Nico Nico Douga and Bilibili.” In China’s Youth Cultures and Collective Spaces: Creativity, Sociality, Identity and Resistance, ed. by Vanessa Frangville, and Gwennaël Gaffric, 98–115, Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1993 Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R., and Delia Chiaro
(eds.) 2010 Humor in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nozawa, Shunsuke
2012 “The gross face and virtual fame: Semiotic mediation in Japanese virtual communication.” First Monday 17(3): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme
2004 The Linguistic Analysis of jokes. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sindoni, Maria Grazia
2013 Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Marc
2017 “Converging contents and platforms: Niconico video and Japan’s Media Mix Ecology.” In Asian Video Cultures: in the Penumbra of the Global, ed. by Bhaskar Sarkar, and Joshua Neves, 91–112. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1983 “Cognitive processes in humor appreciation.” In Handbook of Humor Research Vol. 1: Basic Issues, ed. by Paul E. McGhee, and Jeffrey H. Goldstein, 39–57. New York: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teng, Man
2018 “Colors in Dan Mu: Emerging meaning-making norms and community online.” Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Multimodality: Multimodality, University of Southern Denmark, 15–17 August 2018.
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1171–1188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2011 The Language of Colour: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xing, Janet Zhiqun
2009 “Semantics and pragmatics of color terms in Chinese.” In Studies of Chinese Linguistics: Functional Approaches, ed. by Janet Zhiqun Xing, 87–102. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yizhou
2016 “The postmodern aesthetic of Chinese online comment cultures.” Communication and the Public 1(4): 436–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Yuhong
2020 “The danmaku interface on Bilibili and the recontextualised translation practice: a semiotic technology perspective.” Social Semiotics 30(2): 254–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021 “ Danmaku subtitling: An exploratory study of a new grassroots translation practice on Chinese video-sharing websites.” Translation Studies 14(1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Yiyi, and Anthony Fung
2017 “Youth online cultural participation and Bilibili: An alternative form of democracy in China?”. In Digital Media Integration for Participatory Democracy, ed. by Rocci Luppicini, and Rachel Baarda, 130–154. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
1997 “La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia- resolución [Relevance theory and the humorous strategy of incongruence-resolution].” Pragmalingüística 3–4: 497–508.Google Scholar
2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–131. Lodon: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2018 Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and Sumin Zhao
2017 “Selfies in ‘mommyblogging’: An emerging visual genre.” Discourse, Context & Media 201: 239–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Leticia Tian, and Daniel Cassany
2019a “ ‘Is it always so fast?’: Chinese perceptions of Spanish through danmu video comments.” Spanish in Context 16(2): 217–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019b “El fenómeno «danmu» y la participación mediática: Comprensión intercultural y aprendizaje de lenguas a través de «El Ministerio del Tiempo» [The ‘danmu’ phenomenon and media participation: Intercultural understanding and language learning through The Ministry of Time ].” Comunicar 581: 19–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yi
2017 “Heteroglossic Chinese online literacy practices on micro-blogging and video-sharing sites.” PhD dissertation, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo van Leeuwen
2014 “Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint.” Text & Talk 34(3): 349–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, and Michele Zappavigna
2018 “The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre: The case of the selfie.” Social Semiotics 28(5): 665–682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Xiqing
2016 “Borderless fandom and contemporary popular cultural scene in Chinese cyberspace.” PhD thesis. University of Washington. https://​digital​.lib​.washington​.edu​/researchworks​/handle​/1773​/36544

Full-text

“The murderer is him ✓”
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Dynel, Marta & Jan Chovanec
2021. Creating and sharing public humour across traditional and new media. Journal of Pragmatics 177 ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Messerli, Thomas C. & Miriam A. Locher
2021. Humour support and emotive stance in comments on Korean TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics 178 ► pp. 408 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Jiayi
2020. How and why people are impolite in danmu?. Internet Pragmatics Crossref logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021.  In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Yuhong
2021. Making sense of the “raw meat”: A social semiotic interpretation of user translation on the danmu interface. Discourse, Context & Media 44 ► pp. 100550 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2020. Making sense of danmu: Coherence in massive anonymous chats on Bilibili.com. Discourse Studies 22:4 ► pp. 483 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.