Article in:
Internet Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Incongruity-resolution humorous strategies in image macro memes

| University of Alicante
In previous research (Yus 2016, 2017), a classification of jokes was proposed depending on how the humorous incongruity-resolution strategy was achieved. Twelve cases were isolated resulting from the combination of several parameters: (1) a differentiation between discourse-based incongruities and frame-based incongruities; (2) the location of the incongruity-triggering element (setup or punchline); and (3) three types of resolution: discourse-, frame- and implication-based. This paper proposes a similar taxonomy of incongruity-resolution patterns for a specific type of internet discourse: the image macro meme. The resulting seven-case taxonomy inherits some of the features of that were proposed for verbal jokes, albeit exhibiting the extent to which the image plays a specific role in the successful meme-centred humorous strategy.
Keywords: image macro meme, incongruity-resolution strategy, internet humour
Published online: 01 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00058.yus
References

References

Dynel, Marta
2016 “ ‘I has seen image macros!’: Advice Animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 10: 660–688.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, Asaf, and Limor Shifman
2017 “Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board.” New Media & Society 19(4): 483–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segev, Elad, Asaf Nissenbaum, Nathan Stolero, and Limor Shifman
2015 “Families and networks of Internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 417–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1972 “A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. by Jeffrey H. Goldstein, and Paul E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 “Cognitive and disparagement theories of humour: A theoretical and empirical synthesis.” In It’s a Funny Thing, Humour, ed. by Antony J. Chapman, and Hugh C. Foot, 41–45. Oxford: Pergamon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983 “Cognitive processes in humor appreciation.” In Handbook of Humor Research. Vol. 1, Basic Issues, ed. by Paul E. McGhee, and Jeffrey H. Goldstein, 39–57. New York: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tay, Geniesa
2015 “Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 US Presidential Election (and beyond).” European Journal of Humour Research 2(4): 46–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2013 “An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The intersecting circles model of humorous communication.” In Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, ‎and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes.” Lingua 197: 103–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 113–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Vásquez, Camilla & Erhan Aslan
2021. “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and creativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics 171 ► pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.