Article published in:
Pragmatics, Humour and the Internet
Edited by Francisco Yus
[Internet Pragmatics 4:1] 2021
► pp. 1227
References

References

Attardo, Salvatore
2001Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4(3–4): 293–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Alan
2004Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Human Strengths. Hove: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiaro, Delia
1992The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London: Routlege. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2012 “Garden paths, red lights and crossroads: On finding our way to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying jokes.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research 1(1): 6–28.Google Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannantonio
2008 “Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: 45–62.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jodłowiec, Maria
2015The Challenges of Explicit and Implicit Communication: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg
1989 “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 374–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber
2017The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John
1983Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian
2000Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka, and Maria Jodłowiec
2018 “Weak communication, joke targets and the punch-line effect: A relevance-theoretic account.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 13: 25–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme
2004The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, Constantine, Tim Wildschut, Jamie Arndt, and Clay Routledge
2008 “Nostalgia past, present, and future.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(5): 304–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1996Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1972 “A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons.” In Psychology of Humor, ed. by Jeffrey. H. Goldstein, and Paul.E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thai, Michael, Alex Borgella, and Melanie S. Sanchez
2019 “It’s only funny if we say it: Disparagement humor is better received if it originates from a member of the group being disparaged.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 85: 103838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2002 “Truthfulness and relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Relevance and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2004 “Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia .” In Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez-Reiter, and María Elena Placencia, 320–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication.” In Irony and Humor: Highlights and Genres, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “A cognitive pragmatics of the phatic internet.” In Emotion in Discourse, ed. by Laura Alba, and Lachlan Mackenzie, 161–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Avner
2009 “The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships.” Society 47(1): 11–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar