Cover not available
Article published In:
The Pragmatics of Internet Memes
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 3:2] 2020
► pp. 145–173

Internet memes we live by (and die by)

| Zhejiang International Studies University
In the internet age, memes are at once products and driving forces of social practices. A meme contains a memetic message and a meme output, and boasts, if guided by a pragmatic way of thinking, several features, including but not limited to salience, frequency, adaptability, argumentativity, sociality, embeddedness, embodiedness, locality, relativity, emotionality and dynamicity. The current global COVID-19 pandemic serves as a fitting and timely touchstone to testify how human beings are surrounded by numerous good and evil memes in the online world, and how internet memes, as can be seen from the illustration of two specific memes, namely, the ‘stay home, stay safe’ meme and the ‘wear a mask’ meme, are impacting human life-worlds, online and offline, with their transformative power, be it constructive or destructive. Moreover, researching how memes plays a decisive part in internet-mediated interaction provides a lens of insight through which ‘deep states’ of human nature of both self and others can be uncovered and through which what Nietzsche called “a revaluation of values” is possible.
Keywords: internet memes, memetic message, meme output, misinformation, infodemic, COVID-19, face mask, transformative power, self-knowledge, other-knowledge, human nature
Article outline
  • 1.What’s in an (internet) meme?
  • 2.Internet memes are in!
    • 2.1The COVID-19 pandemic
    • 2.2The ‘stay home, stay safe’ meme
    • 2.3The ‘wear a mask’ meme
  • 3.We are in internet memes!
  • 4.Concluding remarks: Internet memes we die by?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00066.xie
References (79)
References
Adler, Alfred. 2013. Understanding Human Nature. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago University.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2013. Poetics (trans. by Anthony Kenny). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ask, Kristine, and Crystal Abidin. 2018. “My life is a mess: Self-deprecating relatability and collective identities in the memification of student issues.” Information, Communication & Society 21(6): 834–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aunger, Robert (ed.). 2000. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, William. 1958. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
Beerling, Reinier Franciscus. 1955. “Power and human nature.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16(2): 214–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, Susan. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Evolution and memes: The human brain as a selective imitation device.” Cybernetics and Systems 321: 225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Dangerous memes; or, what the Pandorans let loose.” In Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, ed. by Steven J. Dick, and Mark L. Lupisella, 297–318. Washington, DC: NASA.Google Scholar
Brodie, Richard. 1996. Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme. Seattle: Integral Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Nature. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 1997. Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Mary E. 2002. In Search of Human Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costall, Alan. 1991. “The ‘meme’ meme.” Cultural Dynamics 41: 321–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cua, Antonio S. 1982. “Morality and human nature.” Philosophy East and West 32(3): 279–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (revised edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. The Selfish Gene (40th anniversary edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Mente, Boyé Lafayette. 2008. The Chinese Mind: Understanding Traditional Chinese Beliefs and Their Influence on Contemporary Culture. Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. “Constructions as memes – Interactional function as cultural convention beyond the words.” In Beyond Words: Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 283–305. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Distin, Kate. 2005. The Selfish Meme: A Critical Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2016. “‘I has seen Image Macros!’: Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.Google Scholar
Feibleman, James K. 1979. “Technology and human nature.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10(1): 35–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fix, Alan G. 1978. “Genocentric social theory.” Contemporary Sociology 7(6): 705–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greene, Penelope J. 1978. “From genes to memes?” Contemporary Sociology 7(6): 706–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grundlingh, L. 2018. “Memes as speech acts.” Social Semiotics 28(2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Peter Michael Stephan. 2007. Human nature: The Categorial Framework. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahner, Leslie A. 2013. “The riot kiss: Framing memes as visual argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 491: 151–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, William Donald. 1977. “The play by nature.” Science 196 (4291): 757–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holdcroft, David, and Harry Lewis. 2000. “Memes, minds and evolution.” Philosophy 75(292): 161–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Yingming . 2003. 菜根谭 [ Tending the Roots of Wisdom ] (Chinese-English, trans. by Paul White). Beijing: New World Press.Google Scholar
Horton, Keith. 1999. “The limits of human nature.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49(197): 452–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition (21, vols. ed. by David Fate Norton, and Mary J. Norton). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, Susan, and Nick Chater (eds.). 2005. Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 11, Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Yasmin. 2021. Digital Icons: Memes, Martyrs and Avatars. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jan, Steven B. 2016. The Memetics of Music: A Neo-Darwinian View of Musical Structure and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaworska, Sylvia. 2020. “Is the war rhetoric around Covid-19 an Anglo-American thing?” [URL] (accessed 20 April 2020).
Jenkins, Eric S. 2014. “The modes of visual rhetoric: Circulating memes as expressions.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 100(4): 442–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanai, Akane. 2016. “Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race, and class in a humorous meme.” Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavey, Rae-Ellen W., and Allison B. Kavey. 2021. Viral Pandemics: From Smallpox to COVID-19. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kien, Grant. 2019. Communicating with Memes: Consequences in Post-truth Civilization. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear. 2007. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production.” In A New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kronfeldner, Maria. 2011. Darwinian Creativity and Memetics. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin N., and Patrick Bateson. 2001. “The mechanisms of imitation.” Cybernetics and Systems 32(1–2): 195–224.Google Scholar
Lin, Yutang. 1948. The Wisdom of Laotse. New York: The Random House.Google Scholar
Lu, Ying, and Jan Blommaert. 2020. “Understanding memes on Chinese social media: Biaoqing .” Chinese Language and Discourse 11(2): 226–260.Google Scholar
Marcus, Olivia Rose, and Merrill Singer. 2017. “Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic.” Media, Culture & Society 39(3): 341–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Wolfgang Prinz (eds.). 2002. The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, Ryan M. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moody-Ramirez, Mia, and Andrew B. Church. 2019. “Analysis of Facebook meme groups used during the 2016 US presidential election.” Social Media + Society 5(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1996. Human, All Too Human (trans. by R. J. Hollingdale). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Beyond Good and Evil (ed. by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Judith Norman, and trans. by Judith Norman). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Twilight of the Idols (trans. by Antony M. Ludovici). Ware: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
. 2017. ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and Other Writings (3rd edn., ed. by Keith Ansell-Pearson and trans. by Carol Diethe). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paton, Bernadette. 2020. “Social change and linguistic change: The language of Covid-19.” [URL] (accessed 12 April 2020).
Perez Salazar, Gabriel. 2019. “The internet meme as a digital text: Characterization and social uses in electoral processes.” Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia 12(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plato. 2000. The Republic (ed. by G. R. F. Ferrari and trans. by Tom Griffith). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabadan, Raul. 2020. Understanding Coronavirus. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutakirwa, Tonny. 2020. Understanding Corona Virus (COVID-19): The Only Manual You Will Need. London: Tonniez Publishing Press.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. 2017. On Human Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1997. The Mystery of Consciousness. New York: The New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sun-tzu. 1994. The Art of War (translated, with introductions and commentary by Ralph D. Sawyer). Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Taecharungroj, Viriya, and Pitchanut Nueangjamnong. 2015. “Humour 2.0: Styles and types of humour and virality of memes on Facebook.” Journal of Creative Communications 10(3): 288–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tay, Geniesa. 2014. “Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 US Presidential Election (and beyond).” The European Journal of Humour Research 2(4): 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varis, Piia, and Jan Blommaert. 2015. “Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures.” Multilingual Margins 2(1):31–45.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Notebooks 1914–1916 (ed. by G. H. von Wright, and G. E. M. Anscombe; trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2009. Philosophical Investigations (trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte; revised fourth edition by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Woods, Heather Suzanne, and Leslie A. Hahner. 2019. Make America Meme Again: The Rhetoric of the Alt-Right. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun. 2007. “Controversies about politeness.” In Traditions of Controversy, ed. by Marcelo Dascal, and Han-liang Chang, 249–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun . 2011. 礼貌与模因:语用哲学思考 [ Politeness and Memes: Philosophizing Pragmatics ]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, and Ying Tong. 2019. “Constructing ‘ordinariness’: An analysis of Jack Ma’s narrative identities on Sina Weibo.” In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 179–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong, and Francisco Yus. 2020. “Bonding across Chinese social media: The pragmatics of language play in ‘精(sang) 彩(xin) 有(bing) 趣(kuang)’ construction.” Pragmatics 30(3): 431–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, 2019. “Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–131. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Ben. 2020. “‘Virtual’: A way to be present without being there.” The Wall Street Journal, 11 April. [URL] (accessed 11 April 2020).
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
2022. Complaining, teasing, and meme-framing. Internet Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Ying Tong
2022. Introduction: Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts. In Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Ying Tong
2023. “A tour guide losing her cool”. Pragmatics and Society 14:5 ► pp. 732 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2021. Philosophizing (Im)politeness: Lived Experience, Desire and Human Nature. In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2021. Introduction: Approaching (Im)politeness Philosophically. In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.