Cover not available
Article published In:
Formality and Informality in Online Performances
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[Internet Pragmatics 5:1] 2022
► pp. 115–142

Intimate consumptions

YouTube eating shows and the performance of informality

| University of Bayreuth
In this paper, I investigate how the structure of and discursive performance on North American YouTube eating shows contribute to the creation of intimacy and informality. In a typical eating show, the performer eats copious amounts of food while talking to their non-copresent audience, making use of interactional registers to ‘break’ from the solitary setting and to build rapport with their viewers. The material for this study is based on two case studies drawn from a corpus of YouTube eating shows. At the heart of the eating show performances lies the persona of a ‘friend’ of the viewer, diverting from their highly structured and technologically-mediated communicative nature. While the language used on eating shows may thus seem spontaneous and unprompted, the videos are not only planned but also edited. The simultaneous presence of selected unedited moments (i.e., slips of the tongue and other mishaps), however, is evidence of a conscious blending of front- and backstage performance (Goffman 1959; Shulman 2017).
Keywords: (in)formality, performance, Mukbang, eating shows, front- and backstage, language and food, genre
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Formality and informality
  • 3.Performance and self-presentation
    • 3.1The performance of online self
    • 3.2The performance of eating
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.The performance of informality in eating shows
    • 5.1Component parts and act sequence of eating shows on YouTube
    • 5.2Setting
    • 5.3Subtypes of eating shows
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00070.rud
References (48)
References
Abidin, Crystal. 2015. “Communicative ❤ intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness.” Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 81: n.p. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adema, Pauline. 2009. Garlic Capital of the World: Gilroy, Garlic, and the Making of a Festive Foodscape. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Joceline. 2015. “Now you’ve got the shiveries: Affect, intimacy, and the ASMR whisper community.” Television & New Media 16(8): 683–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 1975. “Verbal art as performance.” American Anthropologist 771: 290–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Doug. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Antonetta L., and Somin Chung. 2017. “Mŏkpang: Pay me and I’ll show you how much I can eat for your pleasure.” Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema 9(2): 155–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Choe, Hanwool. 2019. “Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating.” Language in Society 48(2): 171–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Talking the cat: Footing lamination in a Korean livestream of cats mukbang.” Journal of Pragmatics 1601: 60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés-Conde, Florencia, and Diana Boxer. 2010. “Humorous self-disclosures as resistance to socially imposed gender roles.” Gender & Language 4(1): 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donnar, Glen. 2017. “‘Food porn’ or intimate sociality: Committed celebrity and cultural performances of overeating in meokbang.” Celebrity Studies 8(1): 122–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyer, Richard. 1991. “A star is born and the construction of authenticity.” In Stardom: Industry of Desire, ed. by Christine Gledhill, 132–140. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Frobenius, Maximiliane. 2014. “Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics 721: 59–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Heylighen, Francis, and Jean-Marc Dewaele. 2002. “Variation in the contextuality of language: An empirical measure.” Foundations of Science 71: 293–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horton, Donald, and R. Richard Wohl. 1956. “Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance.” Psychiatry – Interpersonal and Biological Processes 19(3): 215–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 209–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 811: 773–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ketchum, Cheri. 2005. “The essence of cooking shows: How the Food Network constructs consumer fantasies.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 29(3): 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kofoed, Jette, and Malene C. Larsen. 2016. “A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media.” First Monday 21(11): n.p. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koppen, Kim, Mirjam Ernestus, and Margot van Mulken. 2019. “The influence of social distance on speech behavior: Formality variation in casual speech.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15(1): 139–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E. 2016. “You may know me from YouTube: (Micro-)celebrity in social media.” In A Companion to Celebrity, ed. by P. David Marshall, and Sean Redmond, 333–350. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2010. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matwick, Kelsi, and Keri Matwick. 2019. Food Discourse of Celebrity Chefs of Food Network. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matwick, Keri, and Kelsi Matwick. 2017. “Self-deprecatory humor on TV cooking shows.” Language & Communication 561: 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. 2009. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, Susanne. 2020. “Formality and informality in cooking shows: Paula Deen and the development of a genre.” In Talking about Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. by Sofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, 189–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naccarato, Peter, and Kathleen Lebesco. 2012. Culinary Capital. London: Berg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED. n.d. “informal, adj .” [URL] (accessed 20 July 2020).
Orange, Michelle. 2017. “Screening the world: Entertainment unboxed.” Virginia Quarterly Review 93(3): 182–185 [URL] (accessed 20 July 2020).
Page, Ruth. 2019. “Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram.” Internet Pragmatics 2(2): 173–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2002. “The presentation of self in virtual life: Characteristics of personal home pages.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(3): 643–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. 2017. “More than fifty shades of grey: Copyright on social network sites.” Applied Linguistics Review 8(2–3): 213–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Laura. 2007. “The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age.” New Media & Society 9(1): 93–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2020. “Dinner for one: The use of language in eating shows on YouTube.” In Talking about Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. by Sofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schau, Hope Jensen, and Mary C. Gilly. 2003. “We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space.” Journal of Consumer Research 301: 385–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwämmlein, Eva, and Katrin Wodzicki. 2012. “What to tell about me? Self-presentation in online communities.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 387–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler-Castañer, Astrid. 2018. “At the intersection of thinness and overconsumption: The ambivalence of munching, crunching, and slurping on camera.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 782–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, Theresa M. 2013. “Microcelebrity and the branded self.” In A Companion to New Media Dynamics, ed. by John Hartley, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns, 346–354. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shulman, David. 2017. The Presentation of Self in Contemporary Social Life. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Tianxiao Wang, and Christian Go. 2020. “Sexuality vs. sensuality: The multimodal construction of affective stance in Chinese ASMR performances.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 24(4): 492–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, Sarah Myers. 2019. “Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy.” Business & Society 58(1): 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2020. “Digital intimacy and ambient embodied copresence in YouTube videos: Construing visual and aural perspective in ASMR role play videos.” Visual Communication: Online First. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Ge, and Larissa Hjorth. 2019. “Live-streaming, games and politics of gender performance: The case of Nüzhubo in China.” Convergence 25(5–6): 807–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Song, Le & Christian Licoppe
2024. Noticing-based actions and the pragmatics of attention in expository live streams. Noticing ‘effervescence’ and noticing-based sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 226 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gibson, Will
2022. All you need is guitar pedals: The communicative construction of material culture in YouTube product reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 49 ► pp. 100626 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.