Article published In:
Internet PragmaticsVol. 5:2 (2022) ► pp.291–316
“Completely incapable of logical thought”
Delegitimating the MeToo Movement in YouTube comment sections
While the MeToo Movement has generally been accepted as a legitimate response to what was considered endemic sexual harassment and discrimination in Hollywood, its goals and values have nonetheless been questioned and undermined. This study examines the comment sections of two YouTube videos produced by major broadcasting corporations in which the MeToo Movement in Europe is discussed. The comment sections are analysed in terms of expressions of attitude and evaluation, using the Appraisal framework. Through this analysis it is revealed that attitudes expressed in the comments legitimate and normalise anti-feminist ideologies through discursive construction of social norms. Conversely, feminism, as well as immigration, are delegitimated. Commenters delegitimate the MeToo Movement by construing its goals and values as misdirected or insincere. These attitudes are furthermore expressed through dialogically contractive comments, thus constructing them as accepted and matter-of-fact, rather than ideological.
Keywords: Appraisal framework, Critical Discourse Analysis, (de)legitimation, gender, ideologies, YouTube comments
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Feminism and anti-feminism in online spaces
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 3.1Appraisal framework
- 3.2Identifying discourses of (de)legitimation
- 4.Materials and methods
- 4.1YouTube videos
- 4.2Coding ideologies
- 5.Results
- 5.1Research question 1
- 5.1.1Attitude
- 5.1.2Engagement
- 5.2Research question 2
- 5.2.1Scapegoating
- 5.2.2Denaturalisation
- 5.2.3Corruption
- 5.1Research question 1
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Bednarek, Monika
2008 Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 
Cameron, Deborah
1985 Feminist Linguistic Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clark, Rosemary
2016 “ ‘Hope in a hashtag’: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed.” Feminist Media Studies 16(5): 788–804.
Dynel, Marta
2014 “Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 37–52.
2020 “Vigilante disparaging humour at r/IncelTears: Humour as critique of incel ideology.” Language & Communication 741: 1–14.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Routledge.
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
2016 “ ‘Real men don’t hate women’: Twitter rape threats and group identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93,
Ho, Sin Yan Eureka, and Peter Crosthwaite
2018 “Exploring stance in the manifestos of 3 candidates for the Hong Kong Chief Executive election 2017: Combining CDA and corpus-like insights.” Discourse & Society 29(6): 629–654.
Hoffmann, Christian R.
2018 “Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump: The strategic use and effect of negative evaluations in us election campaign tweets.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 55–87.
Irvine, Judith T.
2009 “Stance in a colonial encounter: How Mr. Taylor lost his footing.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 53–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jane, Emma. A.
2017 “Systemic misogyny exposed: Translating Rapeglish from the manosphere with a random rape threat generator.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 21(6): 661–680.
Jaworska, Sylvia, and Ramesh Krishnamurthy
2012 “On the F word: A corpus-based analysis of the media representation of feminism in british and german press discourse, 1990–2009.” Discourse & Society 23(4): 401–431.
Kipnis, Laura
2018 “Has #MeToo gone too far, or not far enough? The answer is both.” The Guardian 13 January. [URL]
Krendel, Alexandra
2020 “The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach.” Discourse & Society 31(6): 607–630.
Kruschek, Gina
2019 “Stigma in the comments section: Feminist and anti-Feminist discussions online.” Computers and Composition 541, 102515.
Lazar, Michelle M.
(ed.) 2005 Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, Wan-Hsin, and Hsi-Yao Su
2019 “ ‘You are in Taiwan, speak Chinese’: Identity, language ideology, and sociolinguistic scales in online interaction.” Discourse, Context & Media 321, 100339.
Lewis, Rebecca, and Alice Marwick
Lim, Jun Jie, Spencer C. Chen, and Mie Hiramoto
2021 “ ‘You don’t ask me to speak Mandarin, okay?’: Ideologies of language and race among Chinese Singaporeans.” Language & Communication 761: 100–110.
Madden, Deborah
2019 “Spanish election: Right-wing parties want to restrict abortion and ban feminist groups.” The Conversation 25 April. [URL]
Martin, James R.
2018 “Interpersonal meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectives.” Functions of Language 25(1): 2–19.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martín-Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk
1997 “ ‘There was a problem, and it was solved!’: Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse.” Discourse & Society 8(4): 523–566.
Marwick, Alice E., and Robyn Caplan
2018 “Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 543–559.
Meadows, Bryan, and Peter Sayer
2013 “The Mexican sports car controversy: An appraisal analysis of BBC’s top gear and the reproduction of nationalism and racism through humor.” Discourse, Context & Media 2(2): 103–110.
Merkin, Daphne
QSR International
Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell
2020 “ ‘Going negative’: An APPRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication 701: 13–27.
Rüdiger, Sofia, and Daria Dayter
2020 “Manbragging online: Self-praise on pick-up artists’ forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 1611: 16–27.
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press.
Sunderland, Jane
2004 Gendered Discourses. Basingstokee: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tarnarutckaia, Elizaveta, and Astrid Ensslin
2020 “The myth of the ‘clarté française’: Language ideologies and metalinguistic discourse of videogame speech accents on Reddit.” Discourse, Context & Media 331, 100352.
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
2008 Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Venäläinen, Satu
2021 “Nobody cares for men anymore: Affective-discursive practices around men’s victimisation across online and offline contexts.” European Journal of Cultural Studies, OnlineFirst.
Verschueren, Jef
2011 Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak
2003 “Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity, and critical discourse analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 1–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, Peter R. R.
2012 “Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories – Attribution and attitudinal positioning.” Discourse, Context & Media 1(2–3): 57–67.
Wright, David
2020 “The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community.” Discourse, Context & Media 361, 100402.
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
2017 “Evaluation.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–458. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2021 “Ambient affiliation in comments on YouTube videos: Communing around values about ASMR.” Journal of Foreign Languages 44(1): 21–40. [URL]