Cover not available
Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 6:1 (2023) ► pp.67–106

“I am a real cat”

French-speaking cats on Twitter as an enregistered variety and community of practice

 | Leipzig University
This paper is an exploration of the variety of French-speaking cats on Twitter. Among the many creative phenomena that the internet has produced, animal-related language varieties, the language used by pets, have been explored as early as the 2000s, yet with a strong and almost exclusive focus on English. I first describe the shared repertoire of lexical, semantic, phonographic, and syntactic features used by French-speaking cats, and show how the simultaneous use of a childlike code and a formal register constructs the sociolinguistic persona of cats as ambivalent animals. I argue that the French variety has become “enregistered” (Squires 2010) insofar as it is perceived and ideologically constructed as a variety of its own while promoting a welcoming culture towards new members. In doing so, cats show that the belonging to a community of practice, notably by drawing on a common repertoire of resources, does not need to be linked with processes of exclusion.
Keywords: Twitter, internet variety, enregisterment, community of practice, French, cats, cat-related language varieties, LOLspeak, LOLcat
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Francophone cats online
  • 2.Cat-related language varieties until now
  • 3.Typical features of English-speaking cats
  • 4.Investigating cats online: The corpus
    • 4.1How it all began
    • 4.2Sütterlin Scat Katz: The established member at the core of the community
    • 4.3A structured network of interrelated accounts
    • 4.4Data selection and researcher’s involvement with the online community
  • 5.Constructing an ambivalent sociolinguistic persona: Cats as arrogant yet needy pets
    • 5.1Recurring topics: More than snapshots of the cats’ daily lives
    • 5.2Lexical features: Euphemisms, exaggerations, and wordplays
    • 5.3The semantic field of personal relations: Childlike politeness and obsequiosity
    • 5.4Phonographic features: Between sociolect and language acquisition
    • 5.5Syntactic features: A mix-and-match
  • 6.Constituting a community of practice: Towards the enregisterment of the variety
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 11 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00083.tru
References (45)
References
Asur, Sitaram, Bernardo A. Huberman, Gabor Szabo, and Chunyan Wang. 2011. “Trends in social media: Persistence and decay.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 51: 434–437. [URL]. DOI logo
Austin, Jessica, and Leslie Irvine. 2020. “‘A very photogenic cat’: Personhood, social status, and online cat photo sharing.” Anthrozoös 33(3): 441–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berland, Jody. 2008. “Cat and mouse: Iconographics of nature and desire.” Cultural Studies 22 (3–4): 431–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Piia Varis. 2015. “Enoughness, accent and light communities: Essays on contemporary identities.” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 1391.Google Scholar
Brannon, Brittany. 2012. “Writing speech: LOLcats and standardization.” Articulāte 171: 33–41.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Jed R. 2008. “Wants Moar: Visual media’s Use of text in LOLcats and silent film.” Gnovis Journal 8(2): 117–124.Google Scholar
Bury, Beata. 2017. “Such LOL: Linguistic variety and identity construction in internet memes.” Neophilological Studies 131: 81–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bury, Beata, and Adam Wojtaszek. 2017. “Linguistic Regularities of LOLspeak.” Sino-US English Teaching 14(1): 30–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calka, Michelle. 2010. “I can has community? A case study and reflection on norms and social support in a Lolcat fan group.” In Group Communication: Cases for Analysis, Appreciation and Application, ed. by Laura W. Black, 83–90. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 2000. Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2018. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (3rd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dash, Anil. 2007. “Cats can has grammar.” [URL]
Fiorentini, Ilaria. 2013. “‘ZOMG! Dis iz a new language’: The case of Lolspeak.” Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 19(1): 90–108.Google Scholar
Gauer, Brittany, and Erica J. Benson. 2011. “‘I can has rules?’ A syntactic analysis of Lolspeak.” Poster presented at Student Research Day, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. [URL] (accessed 20 August 2020).
Gawne, Lauren, and Jill Vaughan. 2011. “I can haz language play: The construction of language and identity in LOLspeak.” In Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference, ed. by Maïa Ponsonnet, Loan Dao, and Margit Bowler, 97–122. Canberra: Australian National University Research Repository.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Golbeck, Jennifer, and Cody Buntain. 2018. “This paper is about lexical propagation on Twitter. H*ckin smart. 12/10. Would accept!” In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 587–590. Barcelona: IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Graham M., and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2009. “Talking text and talking back: ‘My BFF Jill’ from Boob Tube to YouTube.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4): 1050–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laksono, Daniel P., and Adventina Putranti. 2016. “I can haz stail: A language style of LOLcat meme in Icanhas.Cheezburger.Com.” Journal of Language and Literature 16(1): 70–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefler, Jordan. 2011. “I can has thesis? A linguistic analysis of Lolspeak.” Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. [URL]
Leppänen, Sirpa. 2015. “Dog blogs as Ventriloquism: Authentication of the human voice.” Discourse, Context & Media 81: 63–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddox, Jessica. 2021. “The secret life of pet Instagram accounts: Joy, resistance, and commodification in the Internet’s cute economy.” New Media & Society 23(11): 3332–3348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miltner, Kate. 2011. “Srsly phenomenal: An investigation into the appeal of LOLCats.” MA Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Mondémé, Chloé. 2018. “Comment parle-t-on aux animaux ? Formes et effets pragmatiques de l’adresse aux animaux de compagnie.” [How do we talk to animals? Pragmatic forms and effects of addressing pets] Langage et societe [Language and Society] 163(1): 77–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podhovnik, Edith. 2018. “The purrification of English: Meowlogisms in online communities: A qualitative description of a selected #blackcat community on Instagram.” English Today 34(3): 2–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. Purrieties of Language: How We Talk about Our Cats Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Punske, Jeffrey, and Elizabeth Butler. 2019. “Do me a syntax: Doggo memes, language games and the internal structure of English.” Ampersand 61: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Aliza. 2010. “Iz in ur meme / aminalizin teh langwich: A linguistic study of LOLcats.” Verge 71: 1–12.Google Scholar
Santos, Eduarda Abrahão de los. 2012. “Lolcats and Lolspeak: The importance of the internet culture for English professionals.” BELT – Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal 3(1): 62–76.Google Scholar
Saugera, Valérie. 2017. “La fabrique des anglicismes.” [Inventing anglicisms] Travaux de linguistique [Linguistic Work] 75(2): 59–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. 2002. Speech Play and Verbal Art (1st edn.). Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2010. “Enregistering internet language.” Language in Society 39(4): 457–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2004. “Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(4): 399–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2016. Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, André. 2008. “Français des Antilles et français d’Amérique : les diatopismes de Joseph Zobel, auteur martiniquais.” [French of the Antilles and French of America: the diatopisms of Joseph Zobel, author from Martinique] RLiR 721: 115–156.Google Scholar
Vajta, Katharina. 2012. “Autant en emporte le vin, ou : de l’importance des voyelles nasales.” [ Autant en emporte le vin, or: On the importance of nasal vowels] Moderna språk [Modern Languages] 11: 145–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2015. Pidgins, Creoles and Mixed Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, Phillips, and Ryan M. Milner. 2017. The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wile, Cailin. 2020. “The effect of nonstandard language on the perception of cuteness in animal memes.” Kentucky Philogical Review 351: 51–55.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and J. R. Martin. 2018. “#Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media.” Discourse, Context & Media 221: 4–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Leihan, Jichang Zhao, and Ke Xu. 2016. “Who creates trends in online social media: The crowd or opinion leaders?” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sampietro, Agnese
2023. El auge de los ‘stickers’ en WhatsApp y la evolución de la comunicación digital. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 94 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.