Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics: Online-First ArticlesHow to get more views
An analysis of metadiscoursal and discoursal linguistic cues in Arabic clickbait headlines
The study aims to examine how the interactional and interactive linguistic aspects are utilized to qualify the discoursal propositions of Arabic clickbaits to secure viewers’ responsive clicks to thumbnails. To this end, one hundred Arabic YouTube clickbait headlines were selected from five Arabic channels that are owned by independent unofficial entertainment institutions. The data came from a period of one year covering 2021. The data covered different domains such as crafts, sports, entertainment, and science. To examine how the headlines are constructed, we drew on two complementary theoretical frameworks, namely, Machin and Mayer’s (2012) framework of verbal processes and participants, and Hyland’s (2005) interactional and interactive meta-discourse framework. It was found that clickbait creators structured their texts interactionally using more enticing attitude and engagement markers, and self-mentions to emphasize a closer relationship with the viewers so as to persuade them to click the baits. This tendency was further heightened by the frequent use of interactive compositional selections attained by deliberately leaving parts of the headlines opaque realized by the frequent use of consecutive dots, cataphoric markers, and viewer-attitude connective signals. Likewise, the discoursal process selection has never been neutral, as clickbait writers frequently used negative mental and material processes to spark viewers’ curiosity to react and click the bait. YouTube clickbait headlines can have the effect of frustrating viewers and/or decreasing their satisfaction. Thus, this research will hopefully contribute to the detection and isolation of clickbaits as a step required to raise viewers’ awareness of the enticing headlines and as a further step to demote them.
Keywords: Arabic clickbait headlines, interactive metadiscourse, interactional metadiscourse, verbal processes, participants, linguistic enticing strategies
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review and theoretical framework
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Corpus
- 3.2Data preparation
- 4.Data analysis
- 4.1Interactional linguistic choices
- 4.1.1Self-mention
- 4.1.2Attitude markers
- 4.1.3Engagement markers
- 4.1.4Boosters and hedges
- 4.2Interactive linguistic choices
- 4.2.1Logical connectives
- 4.2.2Endophoric markers
- 4.2.3Evidentials
- 4.3Discoursal linguistic choices (Social processes and participants)
- 4.1Interactional linguistic choices
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Al-Ali, Mohammed
2018 “Genre-pragmatic analysis of Arabic academic book reviews (ArBRs).” Pragmatics 28(2): 159–183.
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Yara Sahawneh
2011 “Rhetorical and textual organization of English and Arabic PhD dissertation abstracts in linguistics.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 241: 7–39.
Beckers, Sander F. M., Jenny van Doorn, and Peter Verhoef
2018 “Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 46(3): 366–383. 
Biyani, Prakhar, Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis, and John Blackmer
2016 “ ‘8 amazing secrets for getting more clicks’: Detecting clickbaits in news streams using article informality.” In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 94–100. Palo Alto: AAAI Press.
Blom, Jonas, and Kenneth Hansen
2015 “Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 87–100.
Bryant, Christine, Huhebi Guo, Hari, Kirti, and Deng Kathy
2019 “Content analysis for typographic choices in YouTube video thumbnails for voice assistants.” [URL] (accessed 9 October 2021).
Chakraborty, Abhijan, Bhargavi Paranjape, Sourya Kakarla, and Niloy Ganguly
2016 “Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media.” In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 9–16. San Francisco: IEEE.
Cook, Guy
2001 The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Halliday, Michael
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Harmeling, Coleen, Jordan Moffett, and Robert Palmatier
2018 “Conclusion: Informing customer engagement marketing and future research.” In Customer Engagement Marketing, ed. by Robert Palmatier, V. Kumar, and Coleen Harmeling, 307–323. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2006 Reading Images- the Grammar of Visual Design (2nd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Kuiken, Jeffrey, Anne Schuth, Martijn Spitters, and Maarten Marx
2017 “Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment.” Digital Journalism 5(10): 1300–1314.
Leech, Geoffrey
1966 English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.
Li, Qiwei
Machin, David , and Andrew Mayer
2012 How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
Manjesh, Suraj, Tushar Kanakagiri, P. Vaishak, Vivek Chettiar, and G. Shobha
2017 “Clickbait pattern detection and classification of news headlines using natural language processing.” IEEE 2017 2nd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS), 1–5. San Francisco: IEEE.
Montgomery, Martin
2007 The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
Nir, Raphael
1993 “Discourse analysis of news headlines.” Hebrew Linguistics 371: 23–31.
Pujahari, Abinash, and Dilip Sisodia
2021 “Clickbait detection using multiple categorization techniques.” Journal of Information Science 47(1): 118–128.
Tafesse, Wondwesen
2020 “YouTube marketing: How marketers’ video optimization practices influence video views.” Internet Research 30(6): 1687–1707.
Tanaka, Keiko
1999 Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. London: Routledge.
Tandoc, Edson
2014 “Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping.” New Media and Society 16(4): 559–575.
Van Dijk, Teun
2009 News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New York: Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Veszelszki, Ágne
2017 “Linguistic and non-linguistic elements in detecting (Hungarian) fake news.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communication 4(1): 7–35.
Zannettou, Savvas, Sotirios Chatzis, Kostaninos Papadamou, and Michael Sirivianos
2018 “The good, the bad and the bait: Detecting and characterizing clickbait on YouTube.” 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 63–69. San Francisco: IEEE Xplore.