Cover not available
Article published In:
Advances in the Study of Social Action in Online Interaction
Edited by Valeria Sinkeviciute
[Internet Pragmatics 7:1] 2024
► pp. 63–100

“Resident superhero”

Community veneration on Facebook

| RMIT University,
Situated at the intersection of social media communication and pragmatics of language use online, this article will examine the social action of community veneration of a local plumber by members of a neighbourhood Facebook group, the vast majority of whom do not know each other personally (nor necessarily the plumber). Particular attention will be paid to the way in which this veneration is constructed over time through linguistic creativity and humour, such as limericks, exaggeration, and various terms of reverence and hero worship. In addition to these linguistic devices, it will be shown how the participants actively exploit the digital environment to create context-dependent humour through emojis, memes, and other graphics. The selected examples will illustrate how this collaborative veneration and playfulness also strengthen the sense of belonging in this group of online strangers.
Keywords: veneration, humour, multimodal, belonging, Facebook, online community
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Examples and discussion
    • 4.1Responses with recommendations for RS (47 threads)
    • 4.2Spontaneous unsolicited recommendations for RS (44 threads)
    • 4.3Seeking recommendations (with explicit mentions of RS) (21 threads)
    • 4.4Mentions of RS in non-plumbing related threads (8 threads)
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00112.mul
References (57)
References
Angouri, Jo. 2016. “Online communities of practice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 323–338. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2023. Humor 2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1953. “The position of humor in human communication.” In Cybernetics, Ninth Conference, ed. by Heinz von Foerster, 1–47. New York: Josiah Macey Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
Baym, Nancy K. 2003. “Communication in online communities.” In Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World (Vol. 3), ed. by Karen Christensen, and David Levinson, 1015–1017. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2017. “Fandom.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 545–572. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher. 2020. “Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 351, 100383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiaro, Delia. 2018. The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona. 2018. “Investigating the dynamics of humour: Towards a theory of interactional humour.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “This girl is on fire!’: Interactional humour in YouTube comments on the Notre Dame disaster.” In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts, ed. by Esther Linares-Bernabéu, 87–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2016. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Demjén, Zsofia. 2016. “Laughing at cancer: Humour, empowerment, solidarity and coping online.” Journal of Pragmatics 1011: 18–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2021. “Social actions.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 69–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta, and Jan Chovanec. 2021. “Creating and sharing public humour across traditional and new media.” Journal of Pragmatics 1771: 151–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Michaela de Soucey. 2005. “Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2014. “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 76–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2019. “The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 25–67. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Christian R., and Wolfram Bublitz (eds). 2017. Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idowu-Faith, Bimbola. 2016. “Speaking in the free marketplace of ideas: The stylistics of humour in ‘blogversations’.” In Analyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji, 65–84. Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2018. “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 582–596. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2023. Social Media and Society: Integrating the Digital with the Social in Digital Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen. (eds.). 2023. Conversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Mikko T. Virtanen, and Heidi Vepsäläinen. 2023. “Applying conversation analysis to digital interaction.” In Conversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. by Aino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, 7–39. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà. 2021. “Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks.” In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 145–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linares-Bernabéu, Esther (ed). 2023. The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundquist, Lita. 2020. Humorsocialisering [Humour Socialisation]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Maranto, Gina, and Matt Barton. 2010. “Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom.” Computers and Composition 271: 36–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marone, Vittorio. 2015. “Online humour as a community-building cushioning glue.” European Journal of Humour Research 3(1): 61–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2011. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane. 2023. “Society, culture and the speech act of praise – Observations from Ugandan English vis-à-vis British English.” Contrastive Pragmatics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meredith, Joanne, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel. 2021. “Introduction: The microanalysis of digital interaction.” In Analysing Digital Interaction, ed. by Joanne Meredith, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel, 1–22. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mpofu, Shepherd (ed.). 2021. Digital Humour in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Global South. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullan, Kerry. 2020. “Pile of dead leaves free to a good home: Humour and belonging in a Facebook community.” In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis, ed. by Kerry Mullan, Bert Peeters, and Lauren Sadow, 135-159. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “On the ‘Dark Side’: Facebook humour used for inclusion and exclusion.” European Journal of Humour Research 10(2): 96–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2024. “Humour and creativity in a family of strangers on Facebook.” In Interactional Humor: Multimodal Design and Negotiation, ed. by Béatrice Priego-Valverde, 289–318. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
North, Sarah. 2007. “‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation.” Applied Linguistics 28(4): 538–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurmikari, Helena. 2023. “The Finnish anteeks(i) mitä ‘sorry what’ as a resource for expressing affect on Twitter.” In Conversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. by Aino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, 148–169. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Placencia, Maria Elena, and Amanda Lower. 2017. “Compliments and compliment responses.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 633–660. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riordan, Monica A., and Roger J. Kreuz. 2010. “Cues in computer-mediated communication: A corpus analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1806–1817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadow, Lauren, and Katie Cox. 2024. “Superheroes, war Heroes, health care heroes: The pragmatics of danger and the discourse of heroism.” In The Cultural Pragmatics of Danger, ed. by Carsten Levisen, and Zhengdao Ye, 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2015. “The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 811: 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Pragmatics Online. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014. Language and Social Media: Communication and Community Online. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2017. “Flirting: A designedly ambiguous action?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(2): 128–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taiwo, Rotimi, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji. 2016. Analyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication. Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Steven L., and Rebecca Black. 2011. “Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts.” In Identity Formation in Globalizing Contexts: Language Learning in the New Millennium, ed. by Christina Higgins, 257–278. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona. 2010. “Humor and play in CMC.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 235–251. Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2019. Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weitz, Eric. 2016. “Humour and social media.” The European Journal of Humour Research 4(4): 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland (eds). 2021. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2021. “Pragmatics, humour and the internet.” Internet Pragmatics 4(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Pragmatics of Internet Humour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar