Article published In:
IPrA Papers in PragmaticsVol. 2:1/2 (1988) ► pp.1–24
Description in the social sciences I
Talk-in-interaction
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Alexander, J.C
(1982) Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol.l. Positivism, Presuppositions and Current Controversies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Garfinkel, H
Goodwin, C
Goodwin, M. H
(1980) Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 501:303-317. 
Goodwin, M. H. and Goodwin, C
(1987) Children's arguing. In S. Philips, S. Steele and C. Tanz (eds.), Language, Gender. and Sex in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200-248.
Harris, M
(1968) The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Jefferson, G
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 79-96.
(1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 86-100.
Lerner, G
(1987) Collaborative turn sequences: sentence construction and social action. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Social Science, University of California, Irvine.
Mandelbaum, J
(1987) Couples sharing stories. Communications Quarterly, 351:144-171.
Parsons, T
(1937) The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
Pollner, M
(1987) Mundane Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A
(1978) Compliment responses: on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, 79-112.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-101. BoP
Sacks, H
(1963) Sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, VIII1:1-16.
(1966) Lectures on conversation: Spring, 1966. Mimeo.
(1972a) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J.J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 325-345. BoP
(1972b) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D.N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, New York: Free Press, 31-74.
forthcoming), Lectures on Conversation: 1964–65 edited by G. Jefferson with an introduction by E. A. Schegloff Human Studies.
Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E.A
(1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, New York: Irvington, 15-21.
Schegloff, E.A
(1972) Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D.N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, New York: Free Press,75-119.
(1987) Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, and N. Smelser (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 207-236.
(1988) Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew and T. Wootton (eds.), Erving Goffman: Reflections on the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 89-135.
Watson, D.R
(1987) Interdisciplinary considerations in the analysis of pro-terms. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 261-289.
Weber, M
(1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
Cited by
Cited by 40 other publications
Akiya, Naonori
2024. Inferred vision: An analysis of the commentators’ descriptions of players’ visual perceptions and intentions during volleyball broadcasts. Discourse Studies 
Antaki, Charles
2001. “D’You Like a Drink then Do You?”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 20:1-2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Bilmes, Jack
2011. Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk. Human Studies 34:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Brun‐Cottan, Francoise
1990. Talk in the workplace: Occupational relevance. Research on Language & Social Interaction 24:1-4 ► pp. 277 ff.
Chandler, Jennifer D., Rommel Salvador & Yuna Kim
2018. Language, brand and speech acts on Twitter. Journal of Product & Brand Management 27:4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Danby, Susan & Carolyn D. Baker
2001. Escalating Terror: Communicative Strategies in a Preschool Classroom Dispute. Early Education & Development 12:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Michael Haugh
2022. Action Ascription in Social Interaction. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 3 ff.
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
Drew, Paul
2003. Precision and Exaggeration in Interaction. American Sociological Review 68:6 ► pp. 917 ff.
Edmonds, David Matthew & Christian Greiffenhagen
2021. Configuring Prospective Sensations: Experimenters Preparing Participants for What They Might Feel. Symbolic Interaction 44:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Enfield, N. J. & Jack Sidnell
2022. Action and Accountability in Interaction. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 279 ff.
Enfield, NJ & Jack Sidnell
2017. On the concept of action in the study of interaction. Discourse Studies 19:5 ► pp. 515 ff.
Gravengaard, Gitte & Lene Rimestad
2014. Socializing Journalist Trainees in the Newsroom: On How to Capture the Intangible Parts of the Process1
. Nordicom Review 35:s1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Lara Weinglass
2020. “The Great Australian Pastime”: Pragmatic and Semantic Perspectives on Taking the Piss. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 95 ff.
HAYASHI, MAKOTO
2004. Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society 33:03
Hollander, Jocelyn A. & Hava R. Gordon
2006. The Processes of Social Construction in Talk. Symbolic Interaction 29:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Lawrence, Samuel G.
1996. Normalizing Stigmatized Practices: Achieving Co-Membership by Doing Being Ordinary. Research on Language & Social Interaction 29:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
Lerner, Gene H.
1992. Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Lerner, Gene H.
2022. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 281 ff.
Lerner, Gene H. & Geoffrey Raymond
2021. Body Trouble: Some Sources of Difficulty in the Progressive Realization of Manual Action. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Macbeth, Douglas & Jean Wong
2016. The story of ‘Oh’, Part 2: Animating transcript. Discourse Studies 18:5 ► pp. 574 ff.
Macbeth, Douglas, Jean Wong & Michael Lynch
2016. The story of ‘Oh’, Part 1: Indexing structure, animating transcript. Discourse Studies 18:5 ► pp. 550 ff.
Matsuki, Hiroto
2013. The End of the Sociological Controversy over the Definitions of Family: Reexamining the Implications of the Everyday Concept of Family. Kazoku syakaigaku kenkyu 25:1 ► pp. 52 ff.
McLay, Katherine F.
2019. Geeks, gamers, and girls: revealing diverse digital identities with membership categorisation analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 40:6 ► pp. 946 ff.
Moerman, Michael
1990. Exploring talk and interaction∗. Research on Language & Social Interaction 24:1-4 ► pp. 173 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2009. The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference 20:8 ► pp. 558 ff.
Nelson, Christian K.
2001. The haunting of communication research by dead metaphors: for reflexive analyses of the communication research literature. Language & Communication 21:3 ► pp. 245 ff.
Potter, Jonathan & Derek Edwards
1990. Nigel Lawson's tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology 20:5 ► pp. 405 ff.
Potter, Jonathan & Quentin Halliday
1990. Community leaders. Journal of Pragmatics 14:6 ► pp. 905 ff.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2018. Which epistemics? Whose conversation analysis?. Discourse Studies 20:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2017. ‘It’s Gonna Work’: Spontaneous Activity and Knowledge Management by a Child with Asperger’s Syndrome. In Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction, ► pp. 351 ff.
Rendle-Short, Johanna, Ray Wilkinson & Susan Danby
2015. Name-Calling by a Child with Asperger’s Syndrome. In The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health, ► pp. 350 ff.
Roberts, Felicia
2002. Qualitative differences among cancer clinical trial explanations. Social Science & Medicine 55:11 ► pp. 1947 ff.
Ryen, Anne
2008. Wading the Field with My Key Informant: Exploring Field Relations. Qualitative Sociology Review 4:3 ► pp. 84 ff.
SCHEGLOFF, EMANUEL A.
1999. Schegloff's Texts' as `Billig's Data': A Critical Reply. Discourse & Society 10:4 ► pp. 558 ff.
SCHEGLOFF, EMANUEL A.
1999. Naivete vs Sophistication or Discipline vs Self-Indulgence: A Rejoinder to Billig. Discourse & Society 10:4 ► pp. 577 ff.
SCHEGLOFF, EMANUEL A.
2005. On Complainability. Social Problems 52:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2017. Action in interaction is conduct under a description. Language in Society 46:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
TOE, Tetsuri
2012. Parent Identity in Action. Japanese Sociological Review 62:4 ► pp. 536 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.